Recruitment - Judgment Search Results

The Direct Recruit Class-ii Engineering Officers' Association and othe ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1607; (1990)92BOMLR360; [1990(60)FLR918]; JT1990(2)SC264; 1990(2)KarLJ73; 1990(1)SCALE839; (1990)2SCC715; [1990]2SCR900; 1990(2)SLJ40(SC); 1990(2)LC314(SC); (1990)

good reasons, cannot confer a right upon entrants on later recruitment to enforce the same. The learned Counsel appears to be

Chairman, Railway Recruitment Board Vs. S. Ruban Peter and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)IILLJ92Mad

no claim for appointment as a matter of right for recruitment. They shall have to appear before the prescribed selection board

Ex Recruit Manoj Deswal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 142(2007)DLT791

show that the Commanding Officer was competent to discharge any recruit if he is of the view that such a recruit

Rajya Sabha Recruitment Cell & Anr vs.jitender Yadav & Ors.

Court: Delhi

be required to submit, at the final stage of the recruitment process, a certificate in support of his / her being

Y, Ex. Recruit Anu Sankar Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secre ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

by the Recruiting Medical Officer at the time of the recruitment and if found fit, his case for re-enrolment could be

SachIn Panwar, Recruit Constable Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

application, would reveal that the applicant is a candidate for recruitment as Constable (Executive) with the respondents, in response to a

Ex Recruit Shish Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 129(2006)DLT89; 2006(89)DRJ192; 2007(1)SLJ418(Delhi)

routine tests were carried out at the time of the recruitment of the petitioner. The respondents have consequently, illogically and unjustifiably

Ex. Recruit Dharuv Prakash Vs. Uoi and Others

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

2(A) which was the medical exam at the time of recruitment in which his eye sight was 6/6 and he was

Banking Service Recruitment Board, Madras Vs. V. Ramalingam and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC2861; (1998)8SCC523

ORDER1. This appeal is filed by the Banking Service Recruitment Board, Madras. It pertains to the recruitments made, inter alia,

Ravinder Kumar, Recruit Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

liable to be set aside and quashed. In the present recruitment Shri Braham Prakash, Roll No. 400076, was also involved in