Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Re Presentation - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 21 2012

Present: Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-21-2012

under Sections 15, 18, 27-A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (for short the `Act') registered at Police Station Sadar Fatehabad, District Fatehabad. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone … of Decision: November 21, 2012 Rajesh ...Petitioner v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Atul Lakhanpal,Sr.Advocate with Ms.Neha Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner......RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.69180 of 2012 Application is allowed


Sep 18 2013

Present: Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.Bikramjit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. The petitioner, who retired in the year 1995 while working as Social Studies Master under the Punjab State Education Department, has filed … 2013 Ram Parshad Sharma .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.Bikramjit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. The petitioner, who retired in the year


Sep 12 2013

Present: Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-12-2013

o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6131 of 2012 JUDGMENT RESERVED ON: AUGUST 30 2013 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 12 h, 2013 Sucha Singh .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab … h, 2013 Sucha Singh .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, Deputy Advocate General,Punjab. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.The petitioner while


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 12 2013

Present: Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-12-2013

Health Branch), State of Haryana. He instituted the instant writ petition in the year 1995 claiming a three-fold relief i.e. i) Salary and emoluments of the higher post of Chief Engineer for the period he officiated and … 2013 D.S.Verma, Chief Engineer(Retd.) .......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.OP Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Sukhdev S.Kanwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.SS Goripuria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TEJINDER


Sep 13 2013

Present: Vs. the Financial Commissioner and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-13-2013

/1/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.11737 of 2012 JUDGMENT RESERVED ON: SEPTEMBER 06 2013 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 13 h , 2013 Jasmer Kaur .......Petitioner Versus The Financial … , 2013 Jasmer Kaur .......Petitioner Versus The Financial Commissioner and another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Ms.Sonia G.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, Deputy Advocate General,Punjab. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.The petitioner who


Sep 09 2013

Present: Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-09-2013

the petitioner was vested with a right to be granted one pre-mature increment. Even though the petitioner stands retired, yet the present writ petition has been filed raising a grievance that the benefit of the letter dated … 09 2013 Prithi Raj .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. It has been averred that the petitioner


Sep 17 2013

Present: Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-17-2013

the year 2009/2010. The present writ petition has been preferred praying for the issuance of directions to the respondent-authorities to permit them to continue in service uninterruptedly till such time regular recruitment is made against the post … Harpreet Singh and another .......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.Jaswinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioneRs. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. Both the petitioners were appointed as Instructors


Sep 18 2013

Present: Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.15887 of 2012 JUDGMENT RESERVED ON. SEPTEMBER18 2013 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER24h , 2013 Rajinder Pal .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others … , 2013 Rajinder Pal .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.GS Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Pankaj Mulwani, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. The


Sep 11 2013

Present: Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-11-2013

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.22023 of 2012 JUDGMENT RESERVED ON: AUGUST29 2013 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER11h, 2013 Sucha Singh .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents … SEPTEMBER11h, 2013 Sucha Singh .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.SS Swaich, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, Deputy Advocate General,Punjab. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.FIR No.7 dated


Sep 20 2013

Present: Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-20-2013

Mr.Samarth Sagar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Pankaj Mulwani, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. The District Recruitment Board, Punjab Police issued advertisement dated 25.9.2011 inviting applications from Male and Female candidates for recruitment of 3726 … 2013 Rakesh Kumar Sharma .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.Samarth Sagar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Pankaj Mulwani, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. The


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial