Present: Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Present: vs State of Punjab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Sep 17, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1091131

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1091131
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Sep 17, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Present:

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt

civil writ petition no.17952 of 2013 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh civil writ petition no.17952 of 2013 date of decision: september17 2013 harpreet singh and another .......petitioners versus state of punjab and others .......respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice tejinder singh dhindsa present: present mr.jaswinder singh, advocate for the petitioners. tejinder singh dhindsa, j. both the petitioners were appointed as instructors in the fabrication sector under the co.(centre of excellence) scheme on a purely contractual basis in the year 2009/2010. the present writ petition has been preferred praying for the issuance of directions to the respondent-authorities to permit them to continue in service uninterruptedly till such time regular recruitment is made against the post of instructors and in the trade in which they are working. having heard learned counsel for the petitioners at length, i am of the considered view that the present writ petition malik sushama rani 2013.09.19 15:44 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document civil writ petition no.17952 of 2013 2 is pre-mature. no material/document has been placed on record so as to substantiate the apprehension of the petitioners that while working on adhoc/contractual basis, their services would be dispensed with and they would be replaced by yet another contractual/adhoc arrangement. it is always open for the respondent-department/state to resort to the process of regular selection and appointment. accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed being held to be not maintainable at this stage. suffice it to observe, that it shall be open for the petitioners to approach this court afresh in the eventuality of their services being replaced by another set of adhoc/contractual employees. writ petition dismissed. ( tejinder singh dhindsa ) september 17, 2013 judge sr.malik sushama rani 2013.09.19 15:44 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Full Judgment

CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.17952 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.17952 of 2013 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER17 2013 Harpreet Singh and another .......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Present Mr.Jaswinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioneRs.<><><> TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.

Both the petitioners were appointed as Instructors in the Fabrication Sector under the Co.(Centre of Excellence) Scheme on a purely contractual basis in the year 2009/2010.

The present writ petition has been preferred praying for the issuance of directions to the respondent-authorities to permit them to continue in service uninterruptedly till such time regular recruitment is made against the post of Instructors and in the trade in which they are working.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners at length, I am of the considered view that the present writ petition Malik Sushama Rani 2013.09.19 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.17952 of 2013 2 is pre-mature.

No material/document has been placed on record so as to substantiate the apprehension of the petitioners that while working on adhoc/contractual basis, their services would be dispensed with and they would be replaced by yet another contractual/adhoc arrangement.

It is always open for the respondent-Department/State to resort to the process of regular selection and appointment.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed being held to be not maintainable at this stage.

Suffice it to observe, that it shall be open for the petitioners to approach this Court afresh in the eventuality of their services being replaced by another set of adhoc/contractual employees.

Writ petition dismissed.

( TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA ) September 17, 2013 JUDGE Sr.Malik Sushama Rani 2013.09.19 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2013 Same Parties Present: vs State of Punjab and Others Same Subject Education