Quant - Judgment Search Results

Gas Authority of India Ltd. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Gujarat

fulfill to said agreement an agreement only contains the maximum quantity to supply per day and quality of which is to

Vibhuthi Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)(194)ELT195TriDel

oil manufactured out of imported waste oil corresponding to the quantity of 12490 gallon in respect of licence no 1535024 annexure

Surya Agroils Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(188)ELT97TriDel

the basis of number of bags packed which contained fixed quantity of production i e 20 kgs the orders received from

Agroils Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(102)ECC275

misleading the department pasta food was put in a predetermined quantity of 20 kgs in the hdpe bags designed to hold

Rajinder Gupta Vs. the State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2006CriLJ674; 123(2005)DLT55; 2005(84)DRJ477

proprietary name inn other non proprietary name chemical name small quantity in gm commercial quantity in gm kg 1 169 buprenorphine21

Government of A.P. and ors. Vs. Sri Rama Engineering Constructions (En ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(3)ALD281; 2005(4)ALT26

execution of work huge variations in classification of soils and quantity of rocks were noticed there being disproportionate deviations the employer

J.V. Strips Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)(194)ELT237TriDel

the inputs in the factory 11 in respect of the quantity of finished goods mentioned in the private record the appellants

Thippeshappa Vs. State by Channagiri Police

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2005(2)KarLJ428

involving quantity lesser than commercial quantity but greater than small quantity where the punishment prescribed is with rigorous imprisonment for a

G.M. Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

of the view that the mis declaration in respect of quantity as established by the commissioner in his findings is correct

Sterlite Optical Technologies Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(101)ECC241

leviable under proviso the section 3 1 on the entire quantity that the computerized records clearly point out that only 7330