Skip to content

Did you mean: plant?


Quant - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: quant Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 12,634 results (0.085 seconds)
Apr 25 2000 (SC)

State of Karnataka Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-25-2000

Reported in: AIR2001SC1560; JT2000(6)SC1; 1999(4)SCALE332; (2000)9SCC572

is held by the tribunal that out of the total quantity of water namely 2096 tmc per water year on the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 15 2000 (TRI)

Collr. of Cus. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-15-2000

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT139TriDel

involved in the case thus which of these two the quantity of crude oil as revealed by the vessel s us

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2000 (TRI)

Foods and Inns Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-10-2000

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC798

in carboys designed to hold particular quantity but contained a quantity less than that was not put up in unit containers

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 2000 (TRI)

Commr. of Cus. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT109Tri(Mum.)bai

the ullage survey which has been imported this is the quantity that has been brought into the country and hence imported

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 21 2000 (TRI)

Anant Raj Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-21-2000

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC422

assessees had declared in their price list different rates of quantity discounts 15 was payable as discount in regard to transactions

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2000 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kalikoth Kunchi Timbers

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-24-2000

Reported in: [2000]246ITR202(Ker)

quantity of timber to be transported during the year the quantity shown in the register is only an approximate quantity all

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 2000 (TRI)

Camphor and Allied Products Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-15-2000

Reported in: (2000)(118)ELT65TriDel

buyers had failed to fulfil the condition of clearing entire quantity as agreed in terms of contract in view of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 01 2000 (HC)

Rattan Lal Katyal Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-01-2000

Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)139; 2000(2)ARBLR300(Delhi); 85(2000)DLT661; 2000(53)DRJ589; 2001(2)RAJ484

are rather suggestive of the minimum quantity that is the quantity of the stores would be not less than 18650 quintals

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Harison Chemical

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-25-2000

Reported in: (2001)(128)ELT266Tri(Mum.)bai

97 because it constituted less than 2 by weight of quantity of the export product of tooth paste to be exported

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 09 2000 (HC)

Cadila Laboratories Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-09-2000

Reported in: (2001)1GLR48

where the right to receive payment is admitted and the quantification only of the amount payable is left to be determined

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //