Quant - Judgment Search Results

Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs and Other ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1987(3)BomCR151; 1986(10)ECC191; 1988(18)LC384(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT948(Bom)

the wharf and in the ship for ascertaining whether the quantity could be accounted for 6 even if the cargo is

Midlantic Nat'l Bank Vs. NJDEP

Court: US Supreme Court

in bankruptcy and subsequently oversaw abandonment of both facilities after quanta filed for bankruptcy an investigation of the long island city

Young Vs. Commun. Nutrition Inst.

Court: US Supreme Court

s general definition of adulterated food as that containing a quantity of a substance that renders the food ordinarily injurious to

Shri Dudhganga - Vedganga Vs. Collectors of Central Excise and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1988)LC252Tri(Mum.)bai

of the molasses to the extent of 80 of the quantity stored in kaccha pit nos 2 and 3 during midnight

Zuari Agro Chemicals Limited Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)(8)LC648Tri(Mum.)bai

dated 28 10 76 by disallowing the credit for the quantity received and utilised upto 18 3 76 in the order

Premier Packaging Private Vs. Collecltor of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1986)LC323Tri(Delhi)

kraft paper it was alleged that taking into account the quantity of kraft paper used for manufacturing the quantity shown to

Shri Jayantilal R. Patel Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1987)(13)LC1216Tri(Mum.)bai

after sorting rough diamonds weighing 121 62 cts the remaining quantity were mixed together the diamonds imported are of different colours

Jayantilal R. Patel Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)(25)ELT696Tri(Mum.)bai

of penalty in see no reason to interfere with the quantum of penalty imposed on the appellant 44 point no 6

Standard Woollen Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(11)ECC135

ii cet with reference to yarn spun out of the quantity of the blended fibre from which the sample had been

British India Corporation Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(11)LC115Tri(Delhi)

been removed without payment of duty and that deducting a quantity of 690 065 kilogram wastage 9 431 140 kilogram were