Quant - Judgment Search Results

Director-general Vs. Rajashree Cement

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

other documents to prove that the alleged restriction of the quantity discount has restricted competition or has been prejudicial to public

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Colour Chem Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1994)LC240Tri(Mum.)bai

processed at all on the basis of variations in reprocessed quantity as compared to quantity of rejected goods v the appellants

India Pistons Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1994)(51)LC353Tri(Chennai)

show cause notice was issued demanding duty for the unaccounted quantity of 43 50 mts but later on by an amendment

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Sanjay Paper and Chemical Indus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1995)LC384Tri(Mum.)bai

have been appreciated to come to the conclusion that a quantity of 2 890 m tons has not been cleared from

Metal Forgings P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)(74)ELT367TriDel

manufacture of steel ingots of special specifications and a large quantity of steel ingots produced in the appellant s unit are

Godfrey Philips (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1995)(75)ELT619Tri(Mum.)bai

accountal of cane juice was worked out and from that quantity sugar was alleged to have escaped levy the supreme court

Pure Drinks (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)(73)ELT831TriDel

defective and unusable and accordingly we sent back the entire quantity to the stores which was duly received by them and

Great World Co. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)(74)ELT39TriDel

photo copy of the bill of lading not showing the quantity and without giving proper explanation for such action leads to

Shri Ram Hari Ram Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)48ITD175(Delhi)

that theft the jewellery was lost or not for the quantum of loss of jewellery in the theft the lodgement of

Assistant Excise Commissioner and ors. Vs. Issac Peter and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(2)SC140; 1994(1)KLT698(SC); 1994(1)SCALE715; (1994)4SCC104; [1994]2SCR67

and the auctioning authorities obligated the authorities to supply additional quantities at least at the level of the previous year s