Punishable - Judgment Search Results

Harris Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... limitation neither interferes with the legislature s ability to define statutory ranges of punishment nor calls into question judicial discretion to impose judgment within the range ..... society attaches to the offense consequently facts that trigger an increased mandatory minimum sentence warrant constitutional safeguards actual sentencing practices appear to bolster this conclusion the suggestion .....

Atkins Vs. Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... with less severe impairmentsthose who were not idiots suffered criminal prosecution 341 and punishment including capital punishment see e g i ray medical jurisprudence of insanity 65 87 92 w ..... statistics that would conclusively prove or disprove whether juries routinely consider death a disproportionate punishment for mentally retarded offenders like petitioner instead it adverts to the fact that .....

Ring Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... described how capital sentencing works in that state a defendant cannot receive a death sentence unless the judge makes the factual determination that a statutory aggravating factor exists nevertheless ..... throughout its history the jury determined which homicide defendants would be subject to capital punishment by making factual determinations many of which related to difficult assessments of the .....

Alabama Vs. Shelton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court trial where his guilt was adjudicated eligibility for imprisonment established and prison sentence determined nichols is further distinguishable because the court there applied a less exacting ..... affording courtappointed counsel to indigent misdemeanants while simultaneously preserving the option of probationary punishment we do not share amicus concern that other states may lack the capacity .....

Simranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2002CriLJ3368

..... capable of mass destruction or a biological or chemical substance of warfare is made punishable under section 4 contravention of the provisions of the explosive act 1884 the explosive ..... act tends to be very harsh and drastic containing the stringent provisions and provides minimum punishments and to some other offences enhanced penalties also the provisions prescribing special procedures aiming .....

Dipendra Narayan Munsi Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Board and ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2003)1CALLT290(HC)

..... of the enquiry officer while forwarding the report of the enquiry officer proposed the punishment of dismissal from service and afforded the petitioner an opportunity to make his representation ..... organization therefore the same was required to be taken into consideration before such drastic punishment as dismissal was imposed upon the petitioner the disciplinary authority it is contended has .....

Peter James Gifran Von KalkesteIn Bleach Vs. State of West Bengal and ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2003CriLJ332

his majesty to grant pardons reprieves respites or remissions of punishment 68 as a result of the aforesaid power the governor

Sattazahn Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

their constitutional protection against a second prosecution for an offense punishable by death as the price of a successful appeal from

Mahmad Istekhar Mumtaz Ahmed Rahemani Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2003CriLJ1646; 2003(88)ECC303; (2002)3GLR347

..... of the indian penal code xlv of 1860 be punishable with the punishment provided for the offence 2 a person abets or ..... sessions judge vadodara for challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 19th january 1999 rendered in aforesaid sessions case and ..... correctness and legality of judgment exh 73 of conviction and sentence dated 19th january 1999 rendered by the learned additional sessions .....

G. Ramamoorthy Vs. the Board of Directors of Hindustan Photo Films Man ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)IILLJ241Mad

..... that of the departmental authorities even insofar as imposition of penalty or punishment is concerned unless the punishment or penalty imposed by the disciplinary or the departmental appellate authority is ..... state that the jurisdiction of the tribunal to interfere with the disciplinary matters or punishment cannot be equated with an appellate jurisdiction the tribunal cannot interfere with the .....