Punishable - Judgment Search Results

Kansas Vs. Hendricks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the majority certain resemblances between the act s civil commitment and traditional criminal punishments are obvious like criminal imprisonment the act s civil commitment amounts to secure ..... commits confines and treats those offenders after they have served virtually their entire criminal sentence that time related circumstance seems deliberate the act explicitly defers diagnosis evaluation and .....

United States Vs. Ursery

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 804 scalia j dissenting i f there is a constitutional prohibition on multiple punishments the order of punishment cannot possibly make any difference iii the government s third argument is that ..... be considered to qualify as such partly because forfeitures have historically been understood as punishment and more importantly because no remedial purpose underlay the sanction the statute created merely .....

Rutledge Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... conviction preventing a defendant who later successfully challenges his greater offense from escaping punishment altogether is unpersuasive there is no reason why this particular pair of greater ..... presumptively impermissible to impose as it would be to impose any other unauthorized cumulative sentence the government suggests however that petitioner will never be exposed to collateral consequences .....

Lewis Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

that this prosecution is serious the two offenses charged are punishable by a maximum prison sentence of 12 months all agree

United States Vs. Gonzales

Court: US Supreme Court

..... pelion on ossa in this way adding the 924 c sentence to another sentence that does the identical thing nor do i believe ..... multiple proceedings to establish sentences with an eye toward having such punishments approximate the total penalty that would have been imposed had ..... of whether the underlying felony statute provides for an enhanced punishment if committed by the use of a deadly or dangerous .....

Melendez Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

melendez v united states 518 u s 120 1996 october term 1995 syllabus melendez v united states certiorari to the...

Koon Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... we consider the standard of review iii before the guidelines system a federal criminal sentence within statutory limits was for all practical purposes not reviewable on appeal dorszynski v ..... assault is provoked or unprovoked aggravated assault committed under color of law always will be punished more severely than ordinary aggravated assault the district court did not compare civilian offenders .....

Loving Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... with parliament at times ceding to the crown the 761 task of fixing military punishments from the english experience the framers understood the necessity of balancing efficient military discipline ..... there is no absolute rule furthermore against congress delegation of authority to define criminal punishments we have upheld delegations whereby the executive or an independent agency defines by .....

Nathu Ram Bansal and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1997CriLJ1413

malafide intentions the complaint was filed with respect to offences punishable under sections 500 501 i p c and sections 3

State of Gujarat Vs. Koli Chunilal Savji and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2000)4GLR3277

..... and for too lenient and therefore the notice for enhancement of sentence deserves to be discharged it was emphasised that the incident took ..... 12 years have passed by and therefore the discretion to enhance sentence should not be exercised by this court more particularly when ..... be enhanced has no substance it may be mentioned that maximum punishment provided is of three years and fine the evidence led .....