Punishable - Judgment Search Results

Lockett Vs. Ohio

Court: US Supreme Court

..... aggravated murder with specifications is accepted the court may dismiss the specifications and impose sentence of life imprisonment accordingly in the interests of justice such a dismissal of aggravating ..... a police officer engaged in the performance of his duties constituted cruel and unusual punishment footnote 3 5 the plurality s general endorsement of individualized sentencing as representing .....

United States Vs. Grayson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... grayson s constitutional argument that the district court s sentence constitutes punishment for the crime of perjury for which he has ..... he opens himself to the possibility of an enhanced sentence such a sentence is nothing more or less than a penalty ..... ed 1973 the purpose of incarceration remained primarily retribution and punishment approximately a century ago a reform movement asserting that .....

United States Vs. Wheeler

Court: US Supreme Court

..... are possible the defendant will often face the potential of a mild tribal punishment and a federal punishment of substantial severity indeed the respondent in the present case faced the ..... protecting significant tribal interests footnote 35 federal preemption of a tribe s jurisdiction to punish its members for infractions of tribal law would detract substantially from tribal self government .....

Corbitt Vs. New Jersey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... consideration of all the evidence recommend life imprisonment in which case this and no greater punishment shall be imposed every person convicted of murder in the second degree shall suffer imprisonment ..... argument is beside the point because the statute provides a significantly more severe standard of punishment for the defendant who exercises his constitutional rights than for the one who submits .....

Bordenkircher Vs. Hayes

Court: US Supreme Court

instrument in the amount of 88 30 an offense then punishable by a term of 2 to 10 years in prison

Simpson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... issue before an page 435 u s 12 examination is made to determine whether cumulative punishments for the two offenses are constitutionally permissible it is necessary following our practice of avoiding ..... with any term imposed for the underlying felony the amendment also reduced the minimum mandatory sentence of imprisonment for repeat offenders from five to two years mr justice rehnquist dissenting i .....

Durst Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

convicted person is a youth offender and the offense is punishable by imprisonment under applicable provisions of law other than this

Avaba Bajirao Nikam and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1979CriLJ72

..... that persuaded the learned addl sessions judge in writing the first paragraph of his order punishing a person for different offences and viewing the offences constituted by different elements some of ..... meet the ends of justice and hence i accept mr kamat s request consequently substantive punishment meted out to avaba bajirao nikam and hambirrao vyankatrao nikam in criminal revision applications nos .....

Rajendra Singh Yadav Vs. Chandra Sen and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC882; (1979)4SCC111; 1978(10)LC862(SC)

third tier there is no reason to grumble if the punishment is not of the dreadful species there can be no

E. Balanandan and anr. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1979CriLJ187

..... from the conclusion that the two cannot go together the impugned act provides for additional punishments not provided in the discipline and appeal rules it also provides for suspension and infliction ..... for possible criminal prosecution are inextricably intertwined with the provisions dealing with infliction of disciplinary punishment the whole act must be read down so as to leave the members of the .....