Punishable - Judgment Search Results

Almendarez-torres Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... subsection b by way of contrast referred only to punishment an increased punishment for the felon or the aggravated felon whom subsection ..... state s statutory scheme distinguished a homicide punishable by a life sentence from a homicide punishable by a maximum of 20 years id ..... that the magnitude of the increase in the maximum authorized sentence shows a congressional intent to create a separate crime .....

Lambrix Vs. Singletary

Court: US Supreme Court

the court has an independent obligation to determine the appropriate punishment ross v state 386 so 2d 1191 1197 fla 1980

United States Vs. Labonte

Court: US Supreme Court

should reflect the seriousness of the offense and provide just punishment 28 u s c 994 a 2 and g this

Buchanan Vs. Angelone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... particular statutorily defined mitigating factors this lack of guidance it is argued renders his sentence constitutionally unacceptable petitioner initially recognizes as he must that our cases have distinguished ..... an instruction listing 11 factors that the jury was to consider in determining punishment including a catchall factor allowing consideration of a ny other circumstance which extenuates .....

Hudson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... whether the civil forfeitures in ursery and the involuntary civil commitment in hendricks imposed punishment for double jeopardy purposes for neither sanction was implemented via criminal proceedings 111 ..... consideration of whether a sanction s operation will promote the traditional aims of punishment retribution and deterrence and whether it appears excessive in relation to the alternative .....

United States Vs. Bajakajian

Court: US Supreme Court

..... monetary forfeitures proportioned to the value of the goods involved were considered not as punishment for an offense but rather as serving the remedial purpose of reimbursing the government ..... considered currency smuggling and nonreporting a serious crime and imposed commensurate penalties it authorized punishments of five years imprisonment a 250 000 fine plus forfeiture of all the undeclared .....

O'Dell Vs. Netherland

Court: US Supreme Court

the first limited exception is for new rules forbidding criminal punishment of certain primary conduct and rules prohibiting a certain category

Lynce Vs. Mathis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... morales as respondents contend that the constitutionality of retroactive changes in the quantum of punishment depended on the purpose behind the parole sentencing system the only mention of legislative ..... to prison overcrowding those credits enabled petitioner to be freed from prison before his sentence as originally imposed had run shortly before petitioner secured his release however the florida .....

United States Vs. Watts

Court: US Supreme Court

s character and conduct at sentencing does not result in punishment for any offense other than the one of which the

State of Maharashtra Vs. Ravindra @ Ravi Bansi Gohar and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)99BOMLR140

..... and accused no 3 kishor kishya amarsingh maheshkar for offence punishable under section 302 read with section 149 of ipc for ..... in paragraph 16 of the said decision while considering the sentence of death imposed on the appellants therein the apex court ..... ovalekar submitted that such things have happened and therefore irretrievable sentence of death should not be awarded in our opinion if .....