Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.
See full guide → Try it now

Public Utility - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
1981

General Public Utilities Corp. Vs. Susquehanna Valley Alliance

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1981

GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. v. SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY ALLIANCE - 449 U.S. 1096 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. … GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. v. SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY ALLIANCE - 449 U.S. 1096 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Feb 25 1986

PGandE; Vs. Public Utilities Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-25-1986

is de minimis. This is especially true in the case of PG&E;, which is, after all, a regulated public utility. Any claim it may have had to a sphere of corporate autonomy was largely surrendered to extensive regulatory … to identify the actual issue with some care. The narrow question we must address is whether a state public utility commission may require the fundraising solicitation of a consumer advocacy group to be carried in a utility billing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jan 15 1968

Public Utilities Comm. Vs. Baltimore Shippers and Rec.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-15-1968

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC. - 389 U.S. 583 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. … PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC. - 389 U.S. 583 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
1969

Public Utility Dist. Vs. City of Seattle

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1969

PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE - 396 U.S. 803 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY … PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE - 396 U.S. 803 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE , 396 U.S. 803 (1969) 396 U.S. 803 PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 26 1952

Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. Pollak

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-26-1952

operation is precluded by the Constitution. The Capital Transit Company, here called Capital Transit, is a privately owned public utility corporation, owning an extensive street railway and bus system which it operates in the District of Columbia under … Amendments. In finding this relation, we do not rely on the mere fact that Capital Transit operates a public utility on the streets of the District of Columbia under authority of Congress. Nor do we rely upon the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 03 1958

Public Utilities Comm'n of California Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-03-1958

not enjoin, suspend or restrain the operation of, or compliance with, any order affecting rates chargeable by a public utility and made by a State administrative agency or a ratemaking body of a State political subdivision, where:" "(1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 15 1935

Stanley Vs. Public Utilities Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-15-1935

Stanley v. Public Utilities Comm'n - 295 U.S. 76 (1935) U.S. Supreme Court Stanley v. Public Utilities Comm'n, 295 U.S. 76 … Stanley v. Public Utilities Comm'n - 295 U.S. 76 (1935) U.S. Supreme Court Stanley v. Public Utilities Comm'n, 295 U.S. 76 (1935)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jan 11 1943

Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. United Fuel Gas Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-11-1943

Utilities Commission of Ohio, 46 F.Supp. 309. The facts are not in dispute. The Portsmouth Gas Company, a public utility, sells natural gas at retail to the people of Portsmouth, Ohio. It purchases its entire supply of gas … sale of gas by United to the Portsmouth Gas Company for resale to consumers in Portsmouth was a public utility service within the meaning of § 614-2 of the Ohio General Code, and that the rates to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jan 03 1927

Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. Attleboro Steam Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-03-1927

Public Utilities Comm'n v. Attleboro Steam Co. - 273 U.S. 83 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court Public Utilities Comm'n v. … Public Utilities Comm'n v. Attleboro Steam Co. - 273 U.S. 83 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court Public Utilities Comm'n v. Attleboro

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 19 1930

Grubb Vs. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-19-1930

Grubb v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio - 281 U.S. 470 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Grubb v. Public Utilities Commission of … Grubb v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio - 281 U.S. 470 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Grubb v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales