Public Utility - Judgment Search Results
PGandE; Vs. Public Utilities Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-25-1986
hold. Consolidated Edison Page 475 U. S. 12 Co. v. Public Service Comm'n of N.Y., 447 U.S. at 447 U. S. … plurality, the question in this case is whether a public utility commission "may require a privately owned utility company to include
Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. United Fuel Gas Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-11-1943
unjust, the Portsmouth Gas Company challenged the ordinance before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. The Commission found that the complaint … gas transported and sold in interstate commerce to the local utility. P. 317 U. S. 462 . Page 317 U. S.
Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. Pollak
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-26-1952
ordered an investigation of the radio service and, after formal public hearings, ordered its investigation dismissed on the ground that the … amplification of radio programs under such conditions that the total utility service shall not be unsafe, uncomfortable or inconvenient. P. 343
Grubb Vs. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-19-1930
Utilities Commission, 113 O.St. 565; Detroit-Cincinnati Coach Line, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission, 119 O.St. 324; Wheeling Traction Co. v. Public … opinion of the Court. The appellant applied to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio for a certificate to operate, solely in
Public Utilities Comm'n of California Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-03-1958
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Syllabus California enacted, and its Public Utilities Commission plainly indicated an intent to enforce, a statute … compliance with, any order affecting rates chargeable by a public utility and made by a State administrative agency or a ratemaking
Bradley Vs. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-10-1933
upon adequate evidence denial is deemed necessary to promote the public safety. Compare Hammond v. Schappi Bus Line, 275 U.S. 164, … v. Oakley, 47 R.I.19, 129 A. 613; Farnum v. Public Utilities Comm'n, 52 R.I. 128, 158 A. 713 (1932). Compare contra,
Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. Attleboro Steam Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-03-1927
which, on appeal, disapproved an order of the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission increasing the rate chargeable to the Attleboro Company … Public Utilities Comm'n v. Attleboro Steam Co. - 273 U.S. 83 (1927)
Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. Landon
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-17-1919
appeals by different groups of defendants below from decree prohibiting public commissions and officers of Kansas and Missouri, certain municipalities, and … Landon - 249 U.S. 236 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Public Utilities Comm'n v. Landon, 249 U.S. 236 (1919) Public Utilities Commission
Stanley Vs. Public Utilities Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-15-1935
denied in part the appellant's application for a certificate of Public convenience and necessity authorizing him to operate motor vehicles as … Stanley v. Public Utilities Comm'n - 295 U.S. 76 (1935) U.S. Supreme Court Stanley
Public Utility Dist. Vs. City of Seattle
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1969
OF SEATTLE - 396 U.S. 803 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE , 396 U.S. 803 … C. Dill, William G. Ennis, and Bennett Boskey, for Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Pend Oreille County. A. L. Newbould
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »