Public Law - Judgment Search Results

Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law and Order) Revenue D ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

CRIMINAL APPEAL No.507 OF2018(Arising out of SLP (Crl) No 1600 of 2018) Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law and Order) Revenue Department & Anr .....Appellants Kamala & Anr Versus .....Respondents JUDGMENT Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J.1

K. Krishnaveni Vs. the Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006CriLJ757; 2005(5)CTC518

by name, K. Krishnaveni, wife of the detenu challenges the detention order passed by the Secretary to Government, Public (S.C) Department, Chennai-9, detaining her husband, V. Subramaniyam under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling … Articles being smuggled were already given there. This argument is, however, not sufficient to meet the requirements of law because the statement made by the detenu is not admitted and in absence of the detailed account, the

Munees @ Murugan and Others Vs. The Secretary to Government, Public (L ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

activities prejudicial to the security of the State, sovereignty of India and prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order and it became necessary to detain them by virtue of the powers conferred on the detaining authority … the Constitution makes it a fundamental right of a person detained to consult and be defended by a lawyer of his choice. But Article 22(3) specifically excludes the applicability of clause (1) of Article 22 to cases

D. Krishnamoorthy Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Prin ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Petitioner. Either withholding of the charge or not disbursing the terminal benefits to the Petitioner is bad in law. 4. The Petitioner has submitted that once the punishment order is set aside, he is entitled to all

R. Srinivasan Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principa ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Petitioner. Either withholding of the charge or not disbursing the terminal benefits to the Petitioner is bad in law. 4. The Petitioner has submitted that once the punishment order is set aside, he is entitled to all

Krishnamurthy Chettiar Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu Rep, by the Se ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1999(2)CTC300

case was registered in OS.No.l 18 of 1994- RD. In 1992, the petitioner was caught by the Customs Department for having smuggledelectronics goods worth Rs.3,00,000 and a case in O.S. No.321 of 1992-RD was registered. Thereafter, the … Department is not entitled to the same, the sponsoring Authority cannot claim to have discharged their duties under law. Even assuming that the Department filed an application for a copy of it and the same was either

Kumar Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary to Government. Pub ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1998(2)CTC78

the petitioner herein in order to prevent him from indulging in an activity prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. In pursuance of the said order, the petitioner has been detained at the Central Prison, Madurai. In … has been lodged by the wife, on which, action has been taken and investigation is pending, the penal law can deal with such a situation. The Act contemplates that only with a view to prevent a person

U. Dakshinamoorthy Vs. the Commission of Inquiry, presided over by the ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1980)1MLJ121

(in Madurai) on 24th February, 1979. the Government of Tamil Nadu issued a Notification in G.O.Ms. No. 695. Public (Law and Order-A) dated the 9th of April, 1979, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of … W.P. No. 2237 of 1979 has been filed to partially quash the Government Notification (G.O. Ms. No. 695. Public (Law and Order-A)). dated 9th April. 1979, in so far as it directs 'whether there has been any misconduct

P.P.M. Thangaiah Nadar Firm, Rep. by Its Partner, T.P. Prakasam and or ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2007ACJ177; 2006(5)CTC97; (2007)2MLJ685

claim the damages by invoking either the constitutional remedy or civil remedy. Since the constitutional remedy is a public law remedy, the actual victim need not approach the Court. The relief can also be awarded either by exercise … power under Article 226 of the Constitution can definitely grant compensation in terms of the remedy available under public law based on strict liability for contravention of the fundamental rights....21. It is no doubt true that in the