Process - Judgment Search Results

Kushal Textiles Processing Mills Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)(74)ELT854TriDel

..... notification no 130 82 dated 20 4 1982 in respect of processed cotton fabrics the central excise officers seized the 8185 25 meters ..... no 130 82 and accordingly only units engaged exclusively in the process of dyeing were exempted from payment of duty of excise hence ..... appellants claim that a quantity of 20960 05 square meters of processed cotton fabric cleared from the factory on 25 12 1982 comprised .....

Ganesh Metal Processing Industries Vs. Union of India

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995LC252(AP); 1996(81)ELT11(AP)

..... said rules in respect of such ingots and re rollable materials used without undergoing the process of melting in the manufacture of goods falling under chapter 72 or 73 of the ..... said rules in respect of such ingots and re rollable materials used without undergoing the process of melting in the manufacture of goods falling under chapter 72 or 73 of the .....

Shahi Process Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1996(87)ELT373(Raj)

milap chandra j 1 the case of the petitioner is that an appeal under section 35b central excises salt act...

The H.P. Fruit Growers Co-op. Mark. Processing Society Ltd. Vs. the Hi ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1996HP94

orderd p sood j 1 plaintiff is a society registered under the h p co operative societies act 1968 which...

C and a Carbone, Inc. Vs. Clarkstown

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rather local law 9 discriminates evenhandedly against all potential participants in the waste processing business while benefiting only the chosen operator of the transfer facility i believe ..... significant inducement to accept municipal responsibility to guarantee efficiency and sanitation in trash processing waste disposal with minimal environmental damage requires serious capital investment id at 34 .....

Simmons Vs. South Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... psychiatric evidence of a defendant s future dangerousness at a capital sentencing proceeding due process entitles an indigent defendant to the assistance of a psychiatrist for the development of ..... only available alternative sentence to death is life imprisonment without possibility of parole due process entitles the defendant to inform the capital sentencing jury by either argument or instruction .....

S.R. Bommai and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others Etc. Et ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1994SC1918; JT1994(2)SC215; 1994(2)SCALE37; (1994)3SCC1; [1994]2SCR644

..... introduced through the constitution 73rd amendment act making the peoples participation in the democratic process from grass root level a reality participation of the people in governance of the ..... groups of persons interpreting articles 14 and 21 tested administrative orders or actions or process on grounds of arbitrariness irrationality unfairness or unjustness it would thus be apparent that .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sterling Foods (Goa)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1995)127CTR(Bom)30; [1995]213ITR851(Bom)

..... their original character no new commodity or article emerges as a result of such processing the processed prawns retain their identity as prawns no manufacture therefore can be said to take ..... that emerges from the above discussion can be summoned up thus the three expressions processing manufacture and production used in various taxing statutes are not interchangeable expressions though often .....

Honda Motor Co. Vs. Oberg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... important traditional procedure for enforcing stateprescribed limits upon such deprivation violates the due process clause justice ginsburg with whom the chief justice joins dissenting in product liability ..... neither decision declared any specific procedures or substantive criteria essential to satisfy due process in has lip the court expressed concerns about unlimited jury discretion or unlimited .....

United States Vs. Carlton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... enjoys immunity from that burden its retroactive imposition does not necessarily infringe due process moreover the detrimental reliance principle is not limited to retroactive legislation an entirely ..... categorical and inexplicable exclusion of so called economic rights even though the due process clause explicitly applies to property unquestionably involves policymaking rather than neutral legal .....