Process - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: process Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.071 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Prasad Process (Pvt.) Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-15-1982
Reported in: [1983]141ITR9(Mad)
..... what it is that the legislature is driving at we should not mind if this process is called purposive or activist we do not consider them as words of abuse any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTExtrussion Processes Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Chief Controller of Imp ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-08-1982
Reported in: 1984(15)ELT25(Bom)
1 though this petition was argued at considerable length the controversy lies in a very narrow compass and the short...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Raj Kumari Nanda Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-1982
Reported in: [1984]146ITR66(Delhi)
prakash narain c j 1 the question of law referred to the high court by the income tax appellate tribunal...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiv Hiraj Mining Industries and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-29-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Bom83
parekh j 1 being aggrieved by an order and judgment dated 16th june 1975 of the learned civil judge senior...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAddl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-ii Vs. Netar Krishana Sahgals ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-1982
Reported in: (1983)34CTR(Del)376; [1983]141ITR681(Delhi)
prakash narain c j 1 two question of law have been referred to the high court by the i t...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLogan Vs. Zimmerman Brush Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1982
..... was impermissible unless constitutionally adequate notice and hearing procedures were established before the settlement process vent into effect id at 339 u s 315 despite appellee zimmerman brush company ..... 441 most important the procedure at issue does not serve generally to hasten the processing or ultimate termination of employment controversies once the commission has scheduled a factfinding .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.A. Renderian Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-03-1982
Reported in: (1983)32CTR(Cal)318,[1984]145ITR387(Cal)
..... case where a dealer is engaged both in mining operations and in the manufacturing process the two processes being interdependent it would be impossible to exclude vehicles which are used for removing ..... registered dealer may purchase shall be goods intended for use by him as raw materials processing materials machinery plant equipment tools stores spare parts accessories fuel or lubricants in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-i Vs. Lakhtar Cotton Press Co. (Pv ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
Reported in: [1983]142ITR503(Guj)
..... alter their form may be taken in by the term processing processing in the context would therefore mean something less than ..... are right in their contention that the ginning process is a manufacturing process their lordships therefore expressly overruled the decision of ..... learned judge observed that the activity contemplated by the word process in general requiring any continuous and regular action or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmith Vs. Phillips
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-25-1982
..... release simply because the failure of the prosecutors to disclose their knowledge denied respondent due process ibid the court explained to condone the withholding by the prosecutor of information casting ..... conduct acted to deprive respondent of this alternative the state cannot consistent with due process relegate respondent s right to an impartial jury to a belated inadequate post trial .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSantosky Vs. Kramer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-24-1982
..... time immemorial and not without good reason equally as troubling is the majority s due process analysis the fourteenth amendment guarantees that a state will treat individuals with fundamental fairness ..... inadequate under the fourteenth amendment it means simply that the adequacy of the state provided process is to be judged by constitutional standards standards which the majority itself equates to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial