Skip to content


Process - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: process Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.071 seconds)
Dec 15 1982 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Prasad Process (Pvt.) Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-15-1982

Reported in: [1983]141ITR9(Mad)

..... what it is that the legislature is driving at we should not mind if this process is called purposive or activist we do not consider them as words of abuse any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 1982 (HC)

Extrussion Processes Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Chief Controller of Imp ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-08-1982

Reported in: 1984(15)ELT25(Bom)

1 though this petition was argued at considerable length the controversy lies in a very narrow compass and the short...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 1982 (HC)

Smt. Raj Kumari Nanda Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-10-1982

Reported in: [1984]146ITR66(Delhi)

prakash narain c j 1 the question of law referred to the high court by the income tax appellate tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 1982 (HC)

Shiv Hiraj Mining Industries and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-29-1982

Reported in: AIR1983Bom83

parekh j 1 being aggrieved by an order and judgment dated 16th june 1975 of the learned civil judge senior...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 15 1982 (HC)

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-ii Vs. Netar Krishana Sahgals ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-15-1982

Reported in: (1983)34CTR(Del)376; [1983]141ITR681(Delhi)

prakash narain c j 1 two question of law have been referred to the high court by the i t...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 1982 (FN)

Logan Vs. Zimmerman Brush Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-24-1982

..... was impermissible unless constitutionally adequate notice and hearing procedures were established before the settlement process vent into effect id at 339 u s 315 despite appellee zimmerman brush company ..... 441 most important the procedure at issue does not serve generally to hasten the processing or ultimate termination of employment controversies once the commission has scheduled a factfinding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 1982 (HC)

G.A. Renderian Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-03-1982

Reported in: (1983)32CTR(Cal)318,[1984]145ITR387(Cal)

..... case where a dealer is engaged both in mining operations and in the manufacturing process the two processes being interdependent it would be impossible to exclude vehicles which are used for removing ..... registered dealer may purchase shall be goods intended for use by him as raw materials processing materials machinery plant equipment tools stores spare parts accessories fuel or lubricants in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 1982 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-i Vs. Lakhtar Cotton Press Co. (Pv ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jun-30-1982

Reported in: [1983]142ITR503(Guj)

..... alter their form may be taken in by the term processing processing in the context would therefore mean something less than ..... are right in their contention that the ginning process is a manufacturing process their lordships therefore expressly overruled the decision of ..... learned judge observed that the activity contemplated by the word process in general requiring any continuous and regular action or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1982 (FN)

Smith Vs. Phillips

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-25-1982

..... release simply because the failure of the prosecutors to disclose their knowledge denied respondent due process ibid the court explained to condone the withholding by the prosecutor of information casting ..... conduct acted to deprive respondent of this alternative the state cannot consistent with due process relegate respondent s right to an impartial jury to a belated inadequate post trial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1982 (FN)

Santosky Vs. Kramer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-24-1982

..... time immemorial and not without good reason equally as troubling is the majority s due process analysis the fourteenth amendment guarantees that a state will treat individuals with fundamental fairness ..... inadequate under the fourteenth amendment it means simply that the adequacy of the state provided process is to be judged by constitutional standards standards which the majority itself equates to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //