Process - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Acme Process Equipment Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s 142 148 mr justice black delivered the opinion of the court the respondent acme process equipment company brought this action against the united states in the court of claims to ..... 138 1966 u s supreme court united states v acme process equipment co 385 u s 138 1966 united states v acme process equipment co no 86 argued november 9 1966 decided .....

U.S. Vs. Acme Process Equipment Company.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... v acme process equipment company no 1116 supreme court of the united states april 25 1966 solicitor ..... company 384 u s 917 1966 u s supreme court u s v acme process equipment company 384 u s 917 1966 384 u s 917 united states petitioner ..... claims granted and case placed on the summary calendar u s v acme process equipment company 384 u s 917 1966

Miranda Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... from being compelled to incriminate themselves we have concluded that without proper safeguards the process of in custody interrogation of persons suspected or accused of crime contains inherently ..... necessarily requires adherence to any particular solution for the inherent compulsions of the interrogation process as it is presently conducted our decision in no way creates a constitutional .....

Brenner Vs. Manson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s papers did not disclose a sufficient likelihood that the steroid yielded by his process would have similar tumor inhibiting characteristics indeed respondent himself recognized that the presumption that ..... stated by mr justice harlan footnote 1 the applicants described the products of their process as 2 methyl dihydrotestosterone derivatives and esters thereof as well as 2 methyl dihydrotestosterone .....

New Ahmedabad Bansidhar Mills (Private) Ltd., Ahmedabad Vs. Union of I ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1966)7GLR868

..... into existence between the appellant company and the owner of bansidhar process house one ravjibhai mathurbhai patel under that agreement a copy ..... changed their idea to continue the business of the bansidhar process house which was purchased by the plaintiffs as a going ..... that the appellant had not employed any workers of the bansidhar process house there is no cross examination on that point the .....

The New Ahmedabad Bansidar Mills Private Ltd. Vs. the Union of India a ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1968Guj71; (1966)IILLJ503Guj

..... into existence between the appellant company and the owner of bansidhar process house one ravjibhai matherbhai patel under that agreement a copy ..... changed their idea to continue the business of the bansidhar process house which was purchased by the plaintiffs as a going ..... that the appellant had not employed any workers of the bansidhar process house there is no cross examination on that point the .....

K.S. Varadaraja Iyengar Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1967]19STC41(Mad)

..... produce 9 the learned additional government pleader for the respondent contends that in the process of dehusking the arecanuts undergo physical change and therefore the assessee is liable to ..... consideration is whether arecanuts merely by reason of dehusking undergo any physical or other process and thereby lose their character as agricultural produce an interesting question arose in east .....

United States Vs. Price

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the denial of fourteenth amendment rights the same right to due process involved in the indictment under 241 both include rights or ..... taken control of the entire page 383 u s 804 governmental process in former confederate states it had declared the governments in ..... the states as such were beyond the reach of the punitive process and that the legislation must therefore operate upon individuals he .....

City of Greenwood Vs. Peacock

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states commissioners to appoint one or more suitable persons to execute warrants and other process issued by the commissioners footnote 14 these suitable persons were in turn specifically page ..... provided severe penalties for recalcitrant marshals at the same time congress ensured the availability of process servers by providing for the appointment by the commissioners of other suitable persons for .....

Central Railway Workshop (by Works Manager) Vs. Viswanath and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1966)IILLJ717All

..... work could be described as falling within the expression manufacturing process could properly be called workers he further argued that the ..... of work must also relate to work connected with manufacturing process and therefore since the work of the plaintiffs was ..... neither incidental to nor connected with any manufacturing process they could not be properly described as workers within .....