Process - Judgment Search Results

Jai Hind Process and Printing Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)LC457Tri(Delhi)

..... the subject paper was nothing but ordinary paper and retained its identity as paper the process of mere application by rollers of stove melted wax on already manufactured base paper which ..... the inclusion of waxing of paper amongst the treatment specified in item 17 2 such process is a manufacture and accordingly the appellant a manufacturer all the customers twenty seven in .....

Union Processing Corp. Vs. Atkin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1039 justice white with whom the chief justice and justice powell join dissenting petitioner union processing corporation union operates a scrap metal business in auburn new york respondents morris sol and ..... in the same business in rochester both union and atkins purchase and process scrap metal and then sell the processed metal to steel mills and foundries in 1974 union and atkins independently .....

United Offset Process Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)(19)ELT242TriDel

..... but that notification applies to machines attracting duty under 84 35 moreover that notification contemplates process cameras within its ambit the learned counsel for the appellants fairly conceded that the colour ..... scanner imported is not a process camera in the show cause notice it is stated that chromographic colour scanners was .....

Urmil Sood Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1984(6)DRJ333

prakash narain c j 1 one suresh kumar sood has been detained by virtue of an order dated march 30...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi (Central)-i Vs. Bharat Nidhi Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1984]56CompCas276(Delhi)

prakash narain c j 1 these references made by the income tax appellate tribunal delhi bench a have been heard...

Balwindar Singh Vs. Delhi Administory and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1984Delhi379; 1984RLR302

prakash narain j 1 a large number of petitions have been filed in this court which raise the identical questions...

Siddeshwari Cotton Mills Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1984)(18)ELT297TriDel

..... 3 1976 exempted cotton fabrics when subjected to certain specified finishing processes one of the specified processes was calendering other than calendering with grooved rollers the calendering machine ..... no 19 cet manufactured in factories commonly known as powerlooms without spinning or processing plants subject to the specified conditions and exceptions the appellants admittedly were manufacturers .....

Minn. Bd. Commun. for Colleges Vs. Knight

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a collective bargaining agreement and representing the interests of employees in settling disputes and processing grievances are continuing and difficult ones moreover exclusion of a rival union may ..... communication among members of a free society including communication between employer and employee the process of collective bargaining requires that a limited exception to that general principle be .....

Schall Vs. Martin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... we require the full panoply of adversary safeguards counsel confrontation cross examination and compulsory process for witnesses id at 119 instead we recognized the desirability of flexibility and ..... of the juvenile s background would contribute materially to the quality of the decisionmaking process without significantly increasing the duration of initial appearances in summary the three factors .....

Nlrb Vs. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... perceived violation of the collective bargaining agreement the complaining employee is engaged in the process of enforcing that agreement in the context of a workplace dispute where the participants are ..... this argument is mistaken it confuses the employees substantive contract entitlements with the process by which those entitlements are to be vindicated when employees act together in expressing a .....