Skip to content


Precise - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: precise Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 603 results (0.081 seconds)
Feb 25 2000 (TRI)

Precise Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-25-2000

Reported in: (2000)(119)ELT684TriDel

1 for reasons recorded below we dispense with the requirement of pre deposit of duty demand of rs 11 63...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 2000 (TRI)

Precision Extrusions Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-23-2000

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC754

1 this appeal arises from order in original no 26 93 dated 10 3 93 confirming duty amount of rs...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 07 2000 (TRI)

Precision Instrument Co. Vs. Commissioner of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-07-2000

Reported in: (2001)(129)ELT99Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the issue for determination in this case is whether the appellant assessees are related persons of their sole selling...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2000 (HC)

Anuma Precision Tool Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Cus.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-25-2000

Reported in: 2000(121)ELT309(Mad)

..... the petitioner which is a 100 export oriented unit engaged in the manufacture of high precision tools etc to import grinding machines for the above purpose by letter no e 0 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 18 2000 (HC)

All India Small and Medium Newspapers Federation and anr. Vs. Press Co ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-18-2000

Reported in: 2000VIIAD(Delhi)120; AIR2000Delhi409; 87(2000)DLT422; 2000(57)DRJ393

ordermanmohan sarin j 1 this writ petition raise a short but interesting question regarding the number of terms for which...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2000 (FN)

Hill Vs. Colorado

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2000

..... of any merchandise including printed or written material except from a fixed location because that precisely served the state s interest in avoiding congestion and maintaining the orderly movement of fair ..... each of the instances the court cites we concluded that the challenged regulation contained the precision that our cases require and that colorado s statute which the court itself calls .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 2000 (FN)

Apprendi Vs. New Jersey

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-26-2000

..... years imprisonment the rule that justice thomas advocates in his concurring opinion embraces this precise distinction between a fact that increases punishment and a fact that decreases punishment ..... immediate future under current determinate sentencing schemes because the court fails to clarify the precise contours of the constitutional principle underlying its decision federal and state judges are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 2000 (FN)

Rogers Vs. Tennessee

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-01-2000

..... constitutional proscription against ex post facto laws where the state has sought to achieve 459 precisely the same impermissible effect by judicial construction of the statute this language however was ..... was not murder when the act was committed but in which unelected judges can do precisely that one in which the predictability of parliamentary lawmaking cannot validate the retroactive creation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2000 (FN)

Nixon Vs. Shrink Missouri Government Pac

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-24-2000

..... blunderbuss approach which prohibits mostly innocent speech cannot be held a means narrowly and precisely directed to the governmental interest in the small minority of contributions that are not ..... government has less restrictive means of addressing its interest in curtailing corruption bribery laws bar precisely the quid pro quo arrangements that are targeted here and disclosure laws deter actual .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2000 (FN)

Lopez Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-30-2000

..... with lopez that the statute addresses his case unambiguously but disagreeing with him on precisely what the statute says lopez reads the statute to exclude bureau consideration of pre ..... the text of the statute and the aforementioned history demonstrate that congress directly addressed the precise question of what offenses ought to disqualify prisoners from eligibility for a sentence reduction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //