Precise - Judgment Search Results

Precise Impex (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(40)ELT440TriDel

..... the collector of customs appeals madras whereby he rejected the appeal filed by m s precise impex p ltd new delhi against order no s25 1222 83 dated 27 6 83 .....

Precision Fastners Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(19)ECC58

..... in classifications list nos 6 10 12 and 13 filed by the appellants m s precision fasteners ltd they had claimed classification of their products under item 34 a cet the .....

Precision Electricals and Electronics P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Inco ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1989]176ITR453(MP)

g g sohani actg c j 1 this is an application under section 256 2 of the income tax act...

Ashish Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. S. Mukhopadhyay and Another

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1989]74STC293(Bom)

parekh j 1 it is the petitioners case that the petitioners buy condemned barges and dismantle the same and sell...

Boyle Vs. United Technologies Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for design defects in military equipment is displaced where a the united states approved reasonably precise specifications b the equipment conformed to those specifications and c the supplier warned the ..... cannot be imposed pursuant to state law when 1 the united states approved reasonably precise specifications 2 the equipment conformed to those specifications and 3 the supplier warned the .....

Bus. Electr. Corp. Vs. Sharp Electr. Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... upon formal adoption of service obligations that termination is assertedly designed to protect in the precise case of a vertical agreement to terminate other dealers for example there is no ..... more importantly if instead of speculating about irrelevant vertical nonprice restraints we focus on the precise character of the agreement before us we can readily identify its anticompetitive nature before .....

Pierce Vs. Underwood

Court: US Supreme Court

..... think that the question whether the government s litigating position has been substantially justified is precisely such a multifarious and novel question little susceptible for the time being at least of ..... of the statutory language the court points out that substantially is not a word of precise and singular definition indeed the word bears two arguably different relevant definitions considerable in .....

Traynor Vs. Turnage

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 551 as we have noted the 1978 legislation did not expressly contradict the more narrow precise and specific 1977 legislation moreover the 1978 legislation is not rendered meaningless even with respect ..... case basis the basic principle of statutory construction that a statute dealing with a narrow precise and specific subject is not submerged by a later enacted statute covering a more generalized .....

Frisby Vs. Schultz

Court: US Supreme Court

..... who apparently performs abortions at two clinics in neighboring towns appellees and others engaged in precisely that activity assembling outside the doctor s home on at least six occasions between april ..... further because the court is unwilling to examine the brookfield ordinance in light of the precise governmental interest at issue it condones a law that suppresses substantially more speech than is .....

Commun. Workers of Amer. Vs. Beck

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the contrary in street we concluded that congress purpose in amending the rla was limited precisely because congress did not perceive voluntary unionism as the source of widespread and flagrant abuses ..... they repeatedly insisted that the purpose of the amendment was to confer on railway unions precisely the same right to negotiate and enter into union security agreements that all unions subject .....