Precise - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Precision Steel and Engg. Works

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1989]179ITR283(P& H)

gokal chand mital j 1 the assessee is a registered firm during the accounting year relevant to the assessment year...

Precision Technofab and Engineering Co., Ahmedabad and ors. Vs. State ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1990MP55

..... validity period along with confirming the other conditions of the notice inviting tenders 3 the precision aggrieved by the order of the chief engineer inviting contractors for negotiation filed m p ..... the petitioner om metal and similarly to the arithmetical calculation error made by m s precision the aforesaid action of the authorities was in public interest otherwise the public exchequer has .....

Webster Vs. Reproductive Health Svcs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the district court and the court of appeals thought the second sentence to be unconstitutional precisely because they interpreted that sentence to impose state regulation on the determination of viability ..... their unelected and life tenured judges who have been awarded those extraordinary undemocratic characteristics precisely in order that we might follow the law despite the popular will to follow .....

City of Richmond Vs. J. A. Croson Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for waivers where minority owned enterprises are unavailable or unwilling to participate is designed precisely to ease minority contractors into the industry the majority s perfunctory dismissal of the ..... rights and affirmative action have demonstrated time and again that race is constitutionally germane precisely because race remains dismayingly relevant in american life in adopting its prima facie .....

Mistretta Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... proportionate penalties for hundreds of different crimes by a virtually limitless array of offenders is precisely the sort of intricate labor intensive task for which delegation to an expert body ..... been violated because of the lack of intelligible congressionally prescribed standards to guide the commission precisely because the scope of delegation is largely uncontrollable by the courts we must be .....

Twa Vs. Flight Attendants

Court: US Supreme Court

..... strikers would be returned to work as vacancies arose and with precisely the seniority they would have had if no strike had ..... crossovers to be displaced by more senior full term strikers is precisely to visit the consequences of the lost gamble on those who ..... employees whether strikers or crossovers who are most vulnerable this is precisely the point of seniority more fundamental i fear is the legal .....

Pennsylvania Vs. Union Gas Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that is if there were no state sovereign immunity beyond its precise terms then it would unquestionably be most reasonable to interpret it ..... comprehensive even if the parties to a suit fell within its precise terms for example a state and the citizen of another ..... and most importantly the court s reading of cercla employs the precise analytical approach we rejected in employees v missouri dept of public .....

County of Allegheny Vs. Aclu

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the government remain secular rather than affiliating itself with religious beliefs or institutions precisely in order to avoid discriminating against citizens on the basis of their religious faiths ..... else s message thus by prohibiting government endorsement of religion the establishment clause prohibits precisely what occurred here the government s lending its support to the communication of a .....

Finley Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that federal courts scrupulously confine their own jurisdiction to the precise limits which the statute has defined healy v ratta 292 ..... judge henry friendly considered this page 490 u s 565 precise question in three separate opinions footnote 2 17 because he ..... federal court but to require him to prosecute a claim involving precisely the same facts against a codefendant joined pursuant only to .....

Michael H. Vs. Gerald D.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 491 u s 124 decisions establish that the constitution protects the sanctity of the family precisely because the institution of the family is deeply rooted in this nation s history and ..... whether the constitution protects the parental relationship under consideration these cases are after all important precisely because they involve the rights of unwed fathers it is important to remember moreover that .....