Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Court: andhra pradesh Page 72 of about 830 results (0.240 seconds)

i. Praveen Reddy and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... the inflow of water into them. learned advocate general submits that in exercise of the power under section 3-a of the act, the government issued g.o.ms.no.235, revenue, dated 10.03.1985 conferring power upon the district collector to exercise powers under sections 4, 5-a, 6 and 17(4) of the ..... of different pesticides, fertilizer residues carried into the lakes. the hyderabad metropolitan water supply and sewerage board shall conduct such studies through j.n.t.u./central university or any other reputed agency and regular intervals and review the results once in 6 months. e) to prohibit polluting industries within 10 k.mtrs. radius ( ..... and commerce department, government of andhra pradesh, hyderabad. without even verifying the fact that the department headed by her has directed that the proceedings under the act be withdrawn, the secretary proceeded to address letter dated 22.07.2006 requiring the vice-chairman and managing director of the corporation to ensure that the proceedings .....

Andhra Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. Vs. K. Veeraswamy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1990ACJ1013

..... held that the insurance is a contracted guarantee to the owner of the vehicle to discharge his liability under the terms of the policy and it is not a universal guarantee for the vehicle whosoever becomes the owner and the liability during the period of requisition has been specifically excluded under the terms of the policy. if the ..... 1. that agreement specifically excludes the liability of the corporation in the event of any accident. in similar circumstances, the delhi high court in usha sehgal v. chhote 1985 acj 515 (delhi), found that the contract between the owner of the vehicle and the delhi transport corporation by a specific term excluded the d.t.c. from any ..... took place during the requisition period, the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation. after considering the case law and section 94 (1) and (2) of the act, this court held:the liability during the period of requisition, in this case, has been specifically excluded under the terms of the policy exh. b-1. when a .....

G. Madhava Rao and Another Vs. Dr. G. Padma Rao and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... family and other relatives. the plaintiff, the eldest son, graduated in law and was in state government service from 1954 to 1983. the 1st defendant graduated from osmania university and studied medicine at manipal by paying captiation fees at the expense of dr. g. ramachandra rao. the 1st defendant and his wife went to the united kingdom ..... addition of the husband and three sons as the legal representatives in the rent control case will not make the gift deed void. any declaration dated 5-8-1985 said to have been executed by dr. g. ramachandra rao before a notary was not correct and binding. the 2nd defendant in his written statement claimed that ..... but in passing the award herein or getting it registered, the arbitrators cannot be considered to have been shown to have violated any mandatory provisions of the arbitration act, 1940 or the terms of the agreement between the parties. what sri rayudu contends primarily is that in allotting the plaint b schedule property, the arbitrators had .....

Lakshmi Trading Company Vs. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the branch manager, governorpet branch, vijayawada (document no. 9) to the divisional manager of insurance company under heading point no. 2 it was mentioned that it is universal fact, that m/s. laxmi trading company was damaged during recent riots and requesting the divisional manager to settle the claim. 9. it is the case of the ..... road with the permission of the excise department, he shifted his shop premises to d. no. 27-37-47/4 after obtaining the necessary lease in the year 1985. according to the complainant he informed the same to the insurance company on 7.5.85. the certificate of registration issued by the commercial tax department also shows ..... of the complainant reiterating that there is deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties and that, therefore, the complaint is maintainable under the consumer protection act and that the opposite parties are not correct in stating that the complainant paid only rs. 10,500/- for the licence as the said amount represents only .....

M. Koteswara Rao Vs. Apsrtc, Tirupati and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(3)ALD491; 1997(3)ALT68; (1997)IILLJ489AP

..... minded person sitting in court and knowing all the relevant facts have a reasonable suspicion that a fair trial for the applicant was not possible ?' 32. in university college of swansea v. cornelius 1988 icr 735 at 739, holds thus : 'cases of bias and ostensible bias had to he regarded in the light of ..... as mentioned so and bodies which are given jurisdiction to determine judicially the rights of parties.' 36. in j. mohapatra. & co. v. state of odssa : [1985]1scr322 , the supreme court observed thus : 'it is not, therefore, the actual bias in favour of the authormembers that is material but the possibility of such bias. ..... non-compliance may alter with situational variations and particularities, illustrating a 'flexible use of discretionary remedies to meetnovellegalsituations'. 'onemotive' says prof. wade 'for holding administrative acts to be voidable where according to principle they are void may be a desire to extend the discretionary powers of the court.' as observed by lord reid .....

M. Chinna Rao and anr. Vs. Visakhapatnam Steel Project and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD645

..... connection, my attention was drawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners to a judgment of the division bench of this high court in s.t.a.c. vs. andhra university, 1996 (2) ald 1220 in which it is held that the question of delay was not a rule of law but a rule of practice based on sound and proper ..... .6. however, the denial of the same opportunity to the petitioners is hit by the principles laid down by the supreme court in i.p.yadav v. union of india, 1985 (2) slr 249. in paragraph 3 thereof it inter alia observed by the supreme court that a scheme was formulated by the railway ministry according to which casual labour employed .....

Cwt Vs. N.T. Rama Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN430(AP)

..... is held that the question whether an order is prejudicial to the interest of revenue would depend upon the facts of each case and there can be no universal formula applicable to find out any such prejudicial error. the kerala high court further approvingly referred to the law laid down in one of the earliest decisions ..... of wealth as deficit. the commissioner also came to the conclusion that the decision of the supreme court in the case of cwt v. yuvraj amrinder singh : [1985]156itr525(sc) upon which reliance was placed by the wealth tax officer, is not applicable to the assessees case.5. the assessee filed objections to the show- ..... . however, the court having said so, further observed that the jurisdiction of the commissioner being a supervisory jurisdiction is intended for interference in special cases to counter-act orders 'which are erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interests of revenue'. in this context, therefore, the expression prejudicial to the interest of revenue' must .....

Mukesh Kumar and Others Vs. The Debts Recovery Tribunal rep., by its R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... police authorities, and statutory undertakings and corporations, are all 'public authorities'. so are members of a statutory tribunal. so also, a university incorporated by statute. but a limited liability company incorporated under the companies acts is not a 'public authority'. nor is an unincorporated association. (sri konaseema co-operative central bank ltd. (supra); the closing ..... india (1997) 5 scc 536); chhabil dass agarwal (supra); g. veerappa pillai v. raman and raman ltd. (air 1952 sc 192); cce v. dunlop india ltd. (1985) 1 scc 260); ramendra kishore biswas v. state of tripura (1999) 1 scc 472); shivgonda anna patil v. state of maharashtra (1999) 3 scc 5); c.a. ..... bihar (air 1963 sc 786). wherever any body of persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of subjects, and having the duty to act judicially, act in excess of their legal authority they are subject to the controlling jurisdiction of the court exercised in a writ of certiorari. (the king v. .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Malapatinaramma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : I(1991)ACC208

..... monthly instalments and avoidance of lump sum payment would reduce substantially the burden on the insurer and consequently of the insured. in nav bharat builders v. pyarabai.(1985) acj 79 (bombahy):(1984) 2 acc 424, c.s. dharmadhiiari, j.. speaking for the division bench of the bombay high court held that:it cannot ..... ; krishan karle v. united india insurance co. ltd. 1986 acj 1047 (bombay) (1985) 1acc 279.16. thus, the judicial dicta surveyed also is cognizant to ..... rajasthan state road transport corporation v. pista aggarwal (1986) 1 acj 23 (rajasthan) (1985)1 acc 520. it was also rciterated by a division bench of the bombay high court relating to compensation awarded under the workmen's compensation act, in vrajlal laxmidas ladani v. legal their so deceased abdulhasan sida 1986acj916(gujam) and vimal .....

Union of India and Another Vs. Sri Adusumilli Srinivasa Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... 500/- has taken a very lenient view." 16. in the divisional engineer v. m.c. jaffer maraicar, i (1997) cpj 86=1997 (2) cpr 13, the pondicherry state commission further clarified the position as follows : "if a dispute like the present one regarding the a mount of bill arises between the parties/ the normal course the department ..... of ad-hoc compensation for the harassment caused to the subscriber. in telecom district manager v. k. rajaram, i (1998) cpj 359=1997 (3) cpr 556, the pondicherry state commission held as follows : "no doubt the telephone department issues the bill on the basis of the indication of the meters. but when a complaint is lodged regarding ..... telephone or becomes disentitled to it. it is not so in this case. the department has acted with precipitation in disconnecting the telephone before the resolution of the dispute". 17. we are in agreement with the view expressed by the pondicherry state commission. on the facts of the present case not replying to the lawyer's notice .....