Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1993(2)ALT352
..... common entrance test known as the 'engineering, agricultural science and medical common entrance test (eamcet) annually'. its chairman shall be the vice- chancellor of any university or the principal, regional engineering college, warangal, as the case may be, as nominated by the state council of higher education for each academic year for ..... resulted in a very chaotic situation. this court observed as follows :-' rule 4 of the a.p. engineering and medical common entrance test rules, 1985 says that the standard of the test shall be intermediate examination conducted by the board of intermediate education established by the government of andhra pradesh in the ..... examination for admission to institutions of higher education and render advice on admissions.' 'higher education' is defined under section 2 (g) of the said act as meaning 'every education above the tenth class leading to a degree or diploma including intermediate education and technical education but does not include a certificate .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1993AP218
..... year 1990-91 are taking place in tarlupadu college of education, tarlupada by its. principal violating the government orders and the instructions issued by the university. this university will not consider such admissions and will not conduct examinations to those candidates. hence it is informed that candidates seeking admission in the above college ..... follows :--'(g) the government shall forthwith direct the convenor to allot students to the petitioners' colleges out of the central admission pool for the academic year 1985-86.'thereafter the director of school education, andhra pradesh in his proceedings rc no.4309/m-2/8, dated 20-9-1986 declared that the petitioner- ..... the students of unrecognised institutions were legally not entitled to appear at the examination held by the education department of the government, the high court acted in violation of law in granting permission to such students for appearing at the public exam-ination. the directions issued by the full bench are .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1990AP122
..... 14 of the constitution of india and prays that the said rule be struck down.2. the respondent filed a counter-affidavit stating that under r. 2, the university had framed the order of priority for admission, the petitioner comes under category ii(c) and as the other candidates who passed all the three examinations in the ..... not included while a candidate who secured. 63% in botany was selected. she was later informed that as she passed the first year examination in september, 1985 instead of june, 1985, she was treated as having passed in second attempt and was not selected, pursuant to r. 2 of the general conditions for admission to different courses of ..... was seriously ill during that period. therefore, she did not attend the examination due to illness. she however appeared in the supplemental examinations held in september, 1985 and passed in one attempt. she also passed second year examination in one attempt; so also the third year examination. she secured 58% of marks in chemistry .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(4)ALD1
..... did not have 10 years' cumulative experience of teaching and postdoctoral research. since he had obtained a doctorate degree in november, 1985, the university also considered his application and called him for an interview in september, 1985, though according to a strict interpretation of the eligibility criteria respondent no.5 was not qualified. finally in dr. kumar bar ..... 395, the court held that when the language is plain and unambiguous and admits of only one meaning, no question of construction of a statute arises, for the act speaks for itself, maxwell, states:'the construction must not, of course, be strained to include cases plainly omitted from the natural meaning of the words'.13. in j ..... in breach of the law, statute or otherwise, the courts have not only the power but also bound by duty to step in and correct the illegal act grounded on the so-called experts' opinion. the other aspect which needs to be emphasized is that when the law maker in its wisdom prescribes a particular .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1998(3)ALD753; 1998(3)ALT485
..... one of the members of the selection committee, either in the petition or during the course of the submissions. neither anything has been stated that the university acted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the candidates. the principal grievance is that some of the candidates are not having sufficient post graduate teaching experience ..... reputation who has made significant contribution to knowledge.'' 13. be it noted that the applicants did submit their applications alongwith their detailed qualifications and the university upon effective scrutiny did send a list of altogether 24 candidates as being otherwise qualified to appear at the interview before the selection board. the records ..... thakur, 1974 lab. ic 417, including the decision of the calcutta high court in the case of tollygunje club ltd. v. fifth industrial tribunal and others, 1985 (1)llj 258, ought to be noted. in this context, both the patna high court as also the calcutta high court in no uncertain terms held that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1999(1)ALD279
..... merit promotion scheme was discontinued in the revised pay scales of 1986 and the cut-off date is 17-6-1987. based on several requests received from various universities in the state requesting for issue of clear orders on the implementation of merit promotion scheme, the government after careful consideration issue the following order.....'thereafter all the ..... a time but to phase out them spreading the plan period.11. it is not in dispute that this scheme came to an end by 31-12-1985. but on a clarificalion sought by the vice-chancellor of andhra university, the university grants commission in d.o. no.f.1/87-78 cp (part-ill) february, 1986 informed that the ..... have been implemented in this manner. as far as his claim for professorship is concerned there is only one regular post of professor and two more persons were already acting as professors while some others have retired on attaining the age of superannuation. hence, whatever sympathy i may have for him, it is difficult for this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1999(6)ALT692
..... of principal only through a selection committee, consisting of two representatives of the management and three members of whom two are to be nominated by the university and one by the director of higher education. the learned judge felt that the impugned orders, dealing with selection of teachers and principals, completely takes ..... executive committee and the general body had approved the petitioner's appointment as headmistress. the district educational officer, kurnool, while submitting his report on 23-1-1985 raised several new contentions, which were not raised in the counter-affidavit filed earlier. the minutes book and other documents have also been produced before me ..... of kerala v. correspondent, management of schools, 1970 klt 232. in the latter case, the government of kerala issued an order under the kerala education act, 1958 providing that, whenever a vacancy occurred in an aided school, the managers should follow the directions issued by the government from time to time for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2009(1)ALT15
..... selection process and found to be unsuccessful in the preliminary test. in support of his contention, following judgments were relied on.10. swaran lata v. union of india : (1979)illj273sc , university of cochin v. n.s. kanjoonjamma : (1997)iillj228sc , k.h. siraj v. high court of kerala : air2006sc2339 , om prakash shukla v. akhilesh kumar shukla 1986(suppl) scc ..... . the tribunal by its impugned judgment dismissed the o.a. following the judgment of the division bench of this court in s. jaffer saheb v. state of andhra pradesh 1985 (2) aplj 380 (d.b), and unreported judgment of another division bench of this court in writ petition no. 24247 of 2004 dated 31-12-2004. hence, this ..... public services': b.n. nagarajan v. state of mysore. there is nothing in the terms of article 309 of the constitution which abridges the power of the executive to act under article 162 of the constitution without a law. the same view has been taken by this court in t. cajee v. v. jormanik siem and sant ram sharma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1985(5)ECC7; 1985LC346(AP); 1993LC333(AP)
..... counsel first. both the appellate and revisional authorities have clearly held that clarified oil is a marketable commodity and therefore it constitutes goods attracting the duty under the act. we see no reason or ground to depart from this finding, nor any material has been placed before us that the clarified oil is not a marketable ..... rules, 1944, the central government hereby exempts the following vegetable non-essential oils, falling under item no. 12 of the first schedule to the central excises and salt act, 1944 (1 of 1944) from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon--(a) all sorts of vegetable non-essential oils, other than processed vegetable non ..... -essential oils;(b) vegetable non-essential oils, falling under item no. 12 of the first schedule to the central excises and salt act, 1944 (1 of 1944), whether produced in the factory of production of the excisable goods specified below or elsewhere, if used after it is processed in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (1986)ILLJ297AP
ORDER1. This petition seeks writ in the nature of direction to the 2nd respondent to pay back wages in full and the attendant benefits to the petitioner after quashing the award, dated 26th July, 1978 passed by the Labour Court, Hyderabad. The circumstances under which this writ petition came to be filed may be noticed : 2. The petitioner was working as a Conductor in the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. While so, a charge sheet was served on 23rd December, 1971 framing three charges. Due enquiry was conducted and later he was removed from service. It was then contest by the petitioner on reference to the Labour Court wherein the question posed was whether the management of the Corporation is justified in terminating the service of the petitioner. The Labour Court on the detailed evidence and also the material on record, eventually held that the removal order was bad and therefore directed the Corporation to reinstate the petitioner in service however, without back wage...
Tag this Judgment!