Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1984AP199
..... all the engineering colleges of the three universities, namely andhra university, osmania university, venkateswara university and also to all the affiliated engineering colleges under private managements in the state of andhra pradesh other than minority educational institutions. ..... the real question is whether these private engineering colleges are subject to the control of the government. in k. s. ramamurthy v. chief commissioner. pondicherry : [1964]1scr656 their lordships observed thus:'it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that if an authority is appointed by the government of india ..... tribes and backward classes and the andhra pradesh educations institutions (regulation of admission) ordr 1974.'in exercise of powers conferred under section 3 of act 5 of 1983, rules were framed regulating admission of students into engineering colleges in the year 1983 and hate rules are made applicable to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(4)ALD315; 2008(4)ALT240
..... as a part of the consistent policy of the government of india to set up new central universities by the act of parliament. the latest example is that of the pondicherry university, which has also been replaced by a new central university. with the succession of the ciefl university with effect from 03.08.2007, the vice-chancellor of ciefl society also ceased to exist automatically ..... contention of the learned counsel because the law is well settled that no mala fides can be attributed to the legislature.35. in k. nagaraj v. state of andhra pradesh 1985(1) scc 523 the supreme court held as under:the legislature, as a body, cannot be accused of having passed a law for extraneous purpose. its reasons for passing a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (1974)IILLJ353AP
..... nothing in the nature of an office or status which was capable of protection. the terms and conditions of service mentioned in statute 151 framed under the lucknow university act, 1920, have proprio vigore no force of law. they become terms and conditions of service only by virtue of their being incorporated in the contract. without ..... , the question raised was whether the appellant teacher had a statutory status and his services were terminated in violation of the provisions of the statute passed in lucknow university act and, therefore, the high court was wrong in its conclusion that no application for a writ or order in the nature of a certiorari would lie. another ..... affiliated college managed by the governing body established under clause 3 of the 'college code' which is an ordinance made under the provisions of the university of saugar act. the principal of the college served the appellant a charge-sheet and asked him to submit his explanation. the appellant denied all the charges and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1996(4)ALT439
..... , 1954. paragraph 6 to be comprehensive enough to take in a transaction effected before the merger of the french territory of pondicherry with the indian republic to include the transactions including giving effect to the contract and all legal consequences under the laws applicable to imports and exports before ..... a thing done and as it is well understood, it shall include the legal consequence or effect of it which naturally is the supply of goods sold. in universal imports agency v. chief controller, : [1961]1scr305 the supreme court has read in the words 'things done' in french establishments' (application of laws) order ..... of law, it is clear that the corporation has denied to the petitioner-appellant the legal consequences of the contract unfairly and unreasonably. corporation has acted under the instruction of the principal secretary of the government, who apparently has/had no authority to interfere in discharge of the contractual obligations of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1997(5)ALT696
..... legislature alone is competent to legislate with reference to the same. as already seen, the parliament has already enacted sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985. the question then is when the central legislation has already occupied the field, the state legislature can trench upon it. while responding to this claim ..... done' a constitution bench of the supreme court in universal imports agency v.. chief controller, : [1961]1scr305 , observed thus:'by reason of the indo-french agreement the government of india made the order under the foreign jurisdiction act applying the indian laws to pondicherry. the effect of that order was that the ..... sick, consequently, reference was made to the board for industrial & financial reconstruction (bifr), under section 15 of sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 'for short, 'the act', by the state government. in fact the state government was already on hunt for proper entrepreneur to take over the company. a high power .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(1)ALD370; 2002(2)ALT250
..... practitioner, a person should possess a degree in commerce or law of any recognised university. alternatively, an accountant who has passed the accountancy examination conducted bythe central board of revenue constituted under the central board of revenue act, 1924 is also entitled to be registered as sales tax practitioner. rule 63 (3 ..... law is well settled by the binding authoritative pronouncements of the supreme court in maharashtra state board of secondary and higher secondary education v. paritosh bhupeshkumar and others : [1985]1scr29 rayappa v. state of tamil nadu, : (1974)illj172sc , supreme court employees v. union of india , si syndicate v. union of india : [1975] ..... reddy rep., by its partner shri kasturi lal v. state of jammu and kashmir, : [1980]3scr1338 , collector (district magistrate), allahabad v. raja ram jaiswal : [1985]3scr995 and indian express newspapers case (supra).9. it is true that the impugned g.o. ms. no. 816 itself refers to a representation of the chairman, sirc .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(5)ALD717; 2004(6)ALT354
..... 9(2)(b) of the higher education rules is not mandatory and is only directory. secondly, under section 19(16) of a.p. universities act, 1991 (hereafter called, the universities act), the executive council is empowered to suspend or withdraw affiliation only after consultation with the academic senate. in the absence of such consultation with academic ..... examinations, granting of recognition/affiliation, student discipline, creation, appointment and discipline of staff members and the like. all the powers under section 19(5) of the universities act are to be exercised by the executive council by itself. however, as per clauses (16), (17) and (18) of section 19, the executive council ..... counsel for the petitioner, sri muralidhar rao, has placed reliance on the managing board of the milli talimi mission, bihar v. state of bihar, : [1985]1scr410 and al-karim educational trust v. state of bihar, : air1996sc1469 in support of the contention that the college which is permitted to be established has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1999(6)ALD832; 1999(6)ALT341; (2000)ILLJ757AP
..... india without obtaining any consent or the option from the employees to be transferred to transferee company?; (ii) whether under the sick industrial companies (special provision) act, 1985, the employees of a sick company automatically become the employees of the other company to which the sick company is transferred after the final scheme is approved by ..... . the learned counsel for the writ petitioners has brought to our notice the judgment of the supreme court in kundan sugar mills v. ziauddm, : (1960)illj266sc , jawaharlal nehru university v. dr. k.s. jawalkar, 1989 (3) slr 730, manager, m/s. pyarechandkesarimal porwal bidi factory v. onkar laxman thenge, 1973 (1) slr 946, orissa electrical ..... must go. if the post held by him constitutes a class by itself it is possible to say that he issurplus to the requirements of the appellant university and is liable to be retrenched.'27. before considering the judgment of a learned single judge of this court in nizam sugars officers case (supra), we .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(6)ALD630
..... the schedule mentioned property from the operation of urban land ceiling; on the date on which the first plaintiff granted a sub-lease to 2nd plaintiff on 17.4.1985; when the state government allotted a land of an extent of 872 sq.mts in survey no. 82 of resapuvanipalem on the dates on which the rents are ..... not establishing his claim, the suit may result in dismissal, but there is no statutory bar prohibiting institution of the suit, contained either in specific relief act or indian contract act.54. learned counsel for the petitioner-first defendant would contend that the renewal clause being in the nature of the contingent contract and the future event of ..... of renewal does not become void or unenforceable. the question of suit getting barred by any law does not therefore arise. in fact, neither the contract act nor specific relief act contains any statutory bar against maintainability of the present suit. it is not the case of the petitioner/first defendant that the suit is barred by law .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (1990)IILLJ540AP
..... that the appointments of the petitioners were made to permanent posts after due advertisements on the basis of the selection by the selection committee constituted under the osmania university act, and therefore, the appointments cannot be treated as ad hoc, even if they are so described in the orders of appointments. it is further contended ..... approved by the syndicate on 14th september, 1979. the petitioner has not assailed the decision of the syndicate regarding his appointment. section 39 of the osmania university act, 1959 provides for the constitution of selection committee and section 21 deals with the powers of the syndicate. it is stated that the syndicate has powers ..... for regular appointments, including consultation with the public service commission, they are not appointments in a substantive capacity.' 20. in satwant kaur v. pgi chandigarh 1985(1) slr. 1 the learned single judge of the punjab and haryana high court held that a person appointed on ad hoc basis has no right to .....
Tag this Judgment!