Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (1992)ILLJ72AP
..... every undertaking wherein 50 or more employees are employed or were employed twelve months prior to a particular date could be governed by the provisions of the act. that act provides for an application for recognition and the criteria for eligibility is that the union must have, for a whole of six calendar months before application, ..... a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to continue to allow the petitioner-association to represent the officers. 2. the petitioner-association is registered under the trade unions act, 1926 (registration no. d-515/80). the said association is a composite association, representing both officers and workers of the second respondent-bank. the bank is ..... of the 'code of discipline' in industry. 11. the supreme court has recently in b. l. worker's union, bombay v. b. l. & co. ltd. (1985-i-llj-314), has gone into the historical backward of 'recognition' of trade unions. after mentioning the developments in england and the enactment of the trade unions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR2002AP210
..... the words any other process' in section 2(f)(v) of the central excises and salt act, 1944 which defines 'manufacture' in relation to goods in item no. 19-i of the schedule to the central excise tariff act. 1985 to include bleaching, mercerizing dyeing , printing, water proofing rubberizing shrinkpoofing, organdie processing or any other ..... and economic manner in terms of section 18 of the said act. the board had classified its consumers into certain categories on the basis of supply and the purposes for which supply is required by the consumers ..... as the principal supplier of electricity in the state of andhra pradesh till recent reforms were brought about by the andhra pradesh electricity reforms act. 1998. under the supply act, the board was charged with statutory obligation of promoting the co-ordinated development of generation, supply and distribution of electricity in an efficient .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(1)ALD604
..... 11.1984 came to an end, the amount was again redeposited in bank of india for 3 years under deposit certificate no. dbd 3/9, dated 26.3.1985, and on maturity, the amount comes to rs. 5,178-85 ps. the amount is deposited for the benefit of the plaintiff and the plaintiff is at ..... of refund to be granted.the relief of specific performance is a discretionary relief. no doubt, the discretion to be exercised judiciously.section 12 of the specific relief act, 1963 dealing with specific performance of part of contract reads as hereunder:specific performance of part of contract : (1) except as otherwise hereinafter provided in this section ..... be disturbed. while further elaborating his submissions, the learned counsel pointed out to section 12 of the specific relief act, 1963 (for short, 'the act') and would maintain that unless the essentials under section 12 of the act are satisfied, the specific performance of part of the contract cannot be granted. while further elaborating his submissions, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2000(5)ALD764; 2000(5)ALT759
..... counsel for the appellants sri a.k suryanarayana murthy seeks to rely upon a short noted judgment of this court in ch. rangandha chetty v. m. chinnamma and another, 1985 (2) alt (nrc) 114. that was a case where sale agreement was executed by two vendors, co-owners, as per the first settlement deed, which was ..... under the section are not exhaustive. after all presumptions are inferences or logical deductions drawn from out of the provedfacts which are circumstantial. section 11 of the evidence act is the genera! section dealing with presumptions of fact. according to that section the court may presume the existence of any fact which, it thinks likely to have ..... is supported by consideration can be drawn when once the execution is admitted or proved. although, none of the illustrations given under section 114 of the evidence act does cover the situation obtaining under ex.a2 a presumption of fact may certainly be drawn about the passing of the consideration under ex.a2 when execution thereof .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(5)ALD135; 2002(5)ALT650
..... is under mortgage, was one of the listed items of assets of the 1st respondent, the official receiver was added as 2nd defendant through orders in ia no.469 of 1985. he figures as respondent no.2. he filed written statement stating that he is only a formal party and is not aware of the allegations in the plaint. he prayed ..... the document does not require registration because it is not an 'operative instrument'. it does not contain all the essentials of the transaction. what is registrable under the indian registration act is a document and not a transaction.' 19. to the same effect is the judgment in united bank of india v. lekharam s.&c0.;, : air1965sc1591 . the hon'ble supreme court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1995AP105
..... on 20-11-1990, stating that they are members of joint hindu family along with defendants 1 and 2 under the provisions of the hindu succession act, asamended on 6-9-1985; that the 1st defendant, manager of the coparcenary, became addicted to several vices like drinking, gambling and began to sell away the coparcenary property ..... sustained by them.4. defendants 4 to 6, being the unmarrieddaughters of the 1st defendant, became thecoparceners, by virtue of the amendment tothe hindu succession act; vhich came intoforce on 6-9-1985. therefore, they are addedas defendants in the suit; and ex. a.1 agreement is equally binding oh them also. plaintiffs, therefore, claimed that ..... defendants. having stated that the mortgage. ex. b.21, is only a nominal one, the 1st defendant, in fact, discharged the said mortgage debt on 12-4-1985, as per the endorsement, ex. b.22. the plaintiffs obtained the encumbrance certificate from the sub-registrar's office. jangareddigudem, with respect to the suit properly. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1996AP212
..... writ petition is that the petitioner-unit is entitled for 25% rebate till the completion of initial five years as enunciated in g.o.ms. no. 375, dated 23-8-1985. paragraph 3(ii)(ii) of the g.o. is as follows: 'power: at present, the andhra pradesh state electricity board offers 25% tariff concession for the first 3 ..... ' or 'instructions' for the guidance of the board. therefore, we have no hesitation in holding that the government in exercise of powers under section 78a of theelectricity (supply) act, 1948, have been taking policy decisions as to the entitlement of the power concession to the industries and issuing orders reckoning the date of extension of concessions as the date ..... o. ms. no. 654 dated 13-7-1976 and g.o. ms. no. 375 dated 23-8-1985 are in the nature of statutory directions issued to the electricity board in exercise of powers under s. 78a of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. the next step in the argument is that the government, having withdrawn these orders only in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2009(6)ALT278
..... candidatures in the vacancies notified. the allegation that the appointment orders were not issued on the ground of g.o.ms. no. 610 dated 30.12.1985 is misconceived. although, the presidential order has no application to the apcpdcl and though the post notified were not civil posts, a decision was taken since ..... . of a.p. v. a. suryanarayana : air1991sc2113 .16. the presidential order:after insertion of article 371-d of the constitution, by the constitution (thirty-second amendment) act, 1973, the president of india, issued the andhra pradesh public employment (organisation of local cadres and regulation of direct recruitment) order, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as 'the presidential ..... is filed questioning the subsequent notification dated 21.7.2007 and whereas the other three writ petitions are filed assailing the action of the respondents in not acting on the select list pursuant to the notification dated 6-10-2006.6. the central power distribution company of a.p. limited (for short 'a. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1991(2)ALT113; [1992]73CompCas583(AP)
..... , a claim 'by the banking company ...'' 11. these decisions clearly support the view that the misfeasance proceedings initiated by the official liquidator under section 543 of the act are on behalf of the company under liquidation and that they are in the name of that company only. i, therefore, hold that the present application made by the ..... a summary character by which the court in the course of winding up a company assessed and compels the delinquent directors and officers to make payment in respect of the acts of misfeasance or malfeasance, breach of trust or wrongful retention or other misconduct. it was, therefore, held in kumarapuram v. pestonjee [1903] 5 bom lr 633 ..... respect of the forms of misconduct which come within the pale or the purview of section 543 of the companies act, 1956.' 8. i agree with the said observations of mridul j. in gleitlargor (india) pvt. ltd. v. mazagaon dock ltd. [1985] 57 comp cas 742. a division bench of the bombay high court held as follows (p. 748) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (1992)ILLJ193AP
..... of the order, in giving effect to the rights conferred by law upon the employee.' 25. the decision reported in k. c. joshi v. union of india (1985-i-llj-416), is an authority for the proposition that if an employee has been appointed on a regular basis, his service cannot be terminated by one month's notice ..... in the co-operative sugar factories is very high. in order to safeguard the interests of the government, financial institutions and also the share-holders, government have to act in removing such of the managing directors whose work is found to be not satisfactory.'30. in the same sequence of events, the following passage in para 17 at ..... course of his arguments that the writ petition is not maintainable as it has been filed against co-operative society, registered under a.p. co-operative societies act, 1964 (for short 'the act'). it is further contended by the learned additional advocate-general, that the society is not the authority within the meaning of art. 12 of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!