Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Court: andhra pradesh Page 83 of about 830 results (0.673 seconds)

Sep 26 2014 (HC)

Kalvakolanu Tarakamma and Oth Vs. Pulichintala Narsimha Re

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... he himself brought from the treasury on 27-02-1986 by putting the date as 04-09-1985. the son of the defendant has been examined as d.w.2 and it is in ..... his evidence that he gave a complaint to the competent authorities complaining against the illegal act of the stamp vendor. the matter was enquired into by the concerned authorities and ..... endorsed thereon and how can it be executed on 03-10-1985. it is apparent that the stamp paper was purchased by the plaintiff only after 27-02-1986 and it was executed by ante-dating it. voluminous documentary evidence has been produced by the defendant to show about the illegal act of the stamp vendor in selling the stamp paper which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2013 (HC)

V. Parvathalu S/O. Mallaiah, H.No.2-3-19 Vs. the Municipal Council, Ka ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... 09.1984 and hence the building permission is deemed to have been granted to the petitioner. however, on 21.01.1985, the respondent passed orders in terms of sub-section (3) of section 228 of the act directing the petitioner to remove the constructions made by him unauthorizedly, failing which action in accordance with section 340 of ..... the act would be initiated in the matter. at that stage, the writ petitioner filed w.p.no.44 of 1985 in this court. while admitting the said writ petition, a status quo order was passed by this court ..... of section 228 of the andhra pradesh municipalities act, (henceforth referred to as 'act') and the second under sub-section (2) of the same section 228 of the act. these notices are alleged to have been served on the petitioner on 02.01.1985. the petitioner drew a representation on 04.01.1985 pointing out that he has intimated the commencement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2014 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Vs. Shyam Rao Metre and Oth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... -346 10) fao-79/1996, dated 01.06.2000 (delhi) 11) 2013(1) ald-628 12) 2012(5)ald(sc)-35 13) 2012 acj-99=2012(3) ald22614) 2009 acj281815) 1985 acj212(ap) 16) 1998 acj615(ap) 17) 1977 acj253(gujarat) 18) 1987 acj561(sc) 19) 1988 acj667(all.) 20) 2007 acj-1279 (sc) 21) air1995ap6522) 2005 acj1618(guj-db) 23 ..... rambhai prabhatbhai (supra of the apex court), md.abdul wahab (supra of this a.p. high court division bench), held at para-3 that under section 110a of m.v.act, 1939, the claimants- elder brother and sister-claimed as living together also with support of deceased being only legal representatives of him entitled under personal law to compensation only to ..... and severally as against the claim of rs.2,50,000/-(rupees two lakhs fifty thousand only), in the claim petition under section 166 of the motor vehicle act, 1988 (for short, the act).2. heard sri e.venugopal reddy, the learned standing counsel for the appellant and smt.a.chayadevi, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 (who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2015 (HC)

Pasagadugula Narayana Rao, S/O Rama Mur Vs. Pasagadugula Rama Murty, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... decree and judgment of the trial court, the unsuccessful plaintiff preferred the present appeal on various grounds mainly questioning the validity of settlement letter dated 11-06-1985 marked as ex.b4, which was withdrawn by issuing notice since the defendants did not perform their part of obligation i.e. payment of balance of consideration ..... up all his claims in the property. therefore, ex.b4 is neither family settlement deed nor deed of family arrangement.20. section 2 (24) of indian stamp act, 1899 ('the act of 1899' for brevity), defines the word 'settlement' as follows: "any non-testamentary disposition, in writing, of movable or immovable property [whether by way ..... of gift at the time of marriages of his daughters. the subsequent conduct of the parties, in treating the property, clearly established that ex.b4 was acted upon. if the total attending circumstances are taken into consideration, it is evident that the plaintiff relinquished or given up or released his undivided 1/7th share .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2014 (HC)

M/S Atlantic Inter-trade Limited with Re Vs. Canara Bank, Industrial F ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... applied. the disputes about the meaning of a covenant in a contract or its enforceability have to be determined according to the usual principles of the contract act. every act of a statutory body need not necessarily involve an exercise of statutory power. statutory bodies, like private parties, have power to contract or deal with property. ..... made in terms of the principal contract entered into by the appellant with the foreign buyer. but there is no clause in the contract dated april 20,1985 entered between the appellant and the respondents that the contract with the respondents is co-terminus with non-performance or frustration of the contract with the foreign ..... is any fraud committed by the appellant in entering into contract with the respondent in particular with reference to clause 17 of the contract dated april 20, 1985. nor is there any fraud into formation or execution of bank guarantee. from the contention of the appellant it would appear that on account of negotiations between .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 2010 (HC)

Muppala Badari Narayana Vs. Muppala Atchimamba

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... with an addition of creation of charge over the plaint schedule properties. the appellate court after referring to the relevant provisions of hindu adoptions and maintenance act recorded such findings and was of the opinion that in a suit for maintenance non-granting of relief of creation of charge may not be just and ..... section 28 that a person whose right to maintenance is protected under the section must be a dependant. a dependant is defined in section 21 of the act. a wife is not taken in the definition of the word 'dependant'. hence, the wife will not be entitled to have a charge over the ..... plaintiff on one pretext or the other. there was a demand for additional dowry as well. the father of the defendant, who used to admonish such acts of the defendant and his mother, passed away in the month of august 1997. on 05.9.1999 the defendant and his mother necked out the ..... air 1967 calcutta 603 4 air 1967 madras 457 5 2004 (1) ald 77 (db) 6 air 1928 privy council 187 7 air 1985 delhi 491 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2013 (HC)

K.Kotaoah and Others Vs. Koganti Siva Pras

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... defendant and its partners executed a fresh promissory note on 14.01.1988 for rs.1,71,941/- being the amount due under the promissory note dated 13.01.1985 agreeing to repay the same either to plaintiff or his order with 18% interest on demand. the defendants have not repaid the amount due under the said promissory note ..... on the other defendants?. 2) whether the suit is bad for want of registration of the 1st defendant firm and not maintainable under section 69 of the indian partnership act?.9. points: though the 2nd defendant has raised several contentions in the written statement, in his evidence he admits the execution of the agreement. ex.a.15 is ..... it is not a case where any amount is payable under a contract or other legal obligations to contract the provisions under section 69 of the indian partnership act (for short, 'the act'). the evidence of the 2nd defendant clearly goes to show that he has consciously executed all the documents and the income tax return also shows that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2013 (HC)

S. Narayanaswa Vs. Nimmala Appanna, S/O.Peddanna, and 5 Oth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... other defendants and the oral agreement which culminated in ex.a-14/mutchilka is false.27. after attaining majority, d-6 filed a written statement on 03-01-1985 contending that the signature of d-4 on ex.a-2 was forged and it was got up at the instigation of d-2 and d-3 who were ..... suit. i agree. in shankar ramchandra abhyankar v.s krishnaji dattatraya bapat8, an interlocutory order passed by an appellate court constituted under the bombay rents, hotel rates control act, 1947 was challenged under section 115 of the cpc before the bombay high court and the said revision was dismissed. the same order of the appellate court was challenged ..... within the municipal limits of ananthapur for construction of houses to the members of the said club and also authorised plaintiff to enter into agreements and do all such other acts connected with the registration of plots, etc., till the matters are resolved. subsequently, under a resolution dt.07.07.1968, the directors of the judicial club authorised .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2012 (HC)

M/S. India Finlease Securities Limited,c Vs. Indian Overseas Bank Repr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... to himself, and one or more other living persons; and 'to transfer property' is to perform such act. we may also look into the meaning of the word 'transfer'. wests legal thesaurus dictionary by w william startsky, page 754 -1985 defines the word 'transfer': to convey or remove from place or person to another (transfer title). deliver ..... webster comprehensive dictionary deluxe encyclopedic 2003 edn. page 1109 the word 'sale' means: "the act of selling, the exchange or transfer of property for money or its equivalent. wests legal thesaurus dictionary by w william startsky, page 674 -1985 defines: a contract in which the seller in consideration of the payment of promise of payment ..... of a certain price by the buyer transfers title and possession of the thing sold to the buyer. section 54 of the transfer of property act, 1882 defines 'sale' to mean: " .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2012 (HC)

Kone Elevator India Private Limited Rep. Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... who have processed and passed it for payment. so, therefore, if mr.ramanjaneyulu is an officer of the petitioner company wielding considerable amounts of authority and influence, his acts cannot become acts of default on the part of the two workmen. very strangely, the petitioner company has not made a whisper about the role and status of mr.ramanjaneyulu anywhere. obviously ..... . (1979) 2 scc 8.10. air 198.sc 1896(1) (paras 143,144) 11. 1981 (1) llj p 12. 2010(1) scale p 13. air 195.sc 1.14. (1985) 2 scc 72.15. air 198.sc 114.16. air 195.sc 1.17. 1984 air 28.18. 2006 (1) scc p 19. 2007 (9) scc pg 353 common order ..... addressed by the writ petitioner company from its head office at chennai. thereafter, the workmen have invoked the provision available under section 2(a)(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 and respectively raised the industrial dispute concerned. it is stated that upon receipt of notice from the labour court, guntur, the petitioner company entered appearance through a counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //