Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2000(6)ALD76; 2000(5)ALT427
..... inoperative. that is what article 254 of indian constitution says. now, we will go into the two acts - a.p. markets act (state act) and seeds act (central act) - to consider as to whether a.p. markets act clashes with the seeds act.5. seeds act deal with the seeds of food crops including edible oil seeds and seeds of fruits and vegetables, cotton seeds, ..... are equally exigible to market fee and cited the decision rendered by the supreme court in k.u.m. samiti, kanpur v. m/s. ganga dal mill & co., : [1985]1scr787 and a division bench decision of this court in narayana rao & sons v. govt. of a.p., 1997 (3) ald 458. insofar as the contention with regard to double ..... to take samples, and for that purpose exercise all incidental powers under section 14, penal provisions under sections 19 and 20, are the salient features of seeds act and seeds act does not touch upon the payment of any fee akin to market fee or entitlement to levy and collect that fee to the exclusion of any other authority. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2006(6)ALD789; 2007(1)ALT312
..... performed the necessary ceremonies when the plaintiff attained puberty. late paparao performed the marriage of the plaintiff with his sister's son krishna rao on 6.6.1985. the wedding cards were printed showing the plaintiff as the daughter of the adoptive parents. with regard to ex.a3 document it is stated that himself ..... jayamm reddy v. mokkala padmavathamma : 2001(5)ald402 . even the transfer of immovable property by way of pasupu kumkuma requires requisite registration under the registration act. the transfer of property towards pasupu kumkuma is a gift of immovable property, the consideration whereof would be love and affection could come within the meaning of ..... the death of the adoptive father the relatives of the first defendant through her sister polluted the mind of the first defendant and instigated her to act against the interests of the plaintiff. then the plaintiff requested the first defendant for partition of the plaint schedule properties and for allotment and for separate .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1993AP278
..... ceiling) ordinance,1987 (ordinance 1 of 1987) which was subsequently replaced by a.p. interest free salestax loan for industries (imposition ofceiling) act, 1987 (act 20 of 1987). the actwas published in the gazettee on 13-4-1987giving retrospectivity to the provisions of theact with effect from 1-1-1976 ..... . 4. it was further stated in the affidavit that by g.o. ms. no. 375 industries and commerce (ia) department dated 23-8-1985, revised package of state incentives were offered with the object of industrialisation and restricted the same to the identified three intensive industrial areas, viz., adilabad, ..... industrial area became part of ulhasnagar municipal district. subsequently, ulhasnagar district municipality became ulhasnagar municipality, pursuant to the notification issued under the maharashtra municipality act. ulhasnagar municipality resolved to levy octroi duty. government of maharashtra drew the attention of the municipality the circumstances under which the industrial area was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : [1991]81STC458(AP)
..... case. 49. in our opinion, the contention that g.o. ms. no. 224 dated march 9, 1976, stood superseded by g.o. ms. no. 375, dated august 23, 1985, by the time act 20 of 1987 was passed is based on a misconception as to the actual facts. though in the later g.o. it was stated that the earlier g.o ..... questioned its validity. it is argued that g.o. ms. no. 224, dated march 9, 1976, was superseded by g.o. ms. no. 375, dated august 23, 1985 and that by the time act 20 of 1987 was passed there is no g.o. no. 224 in force and that no legislation could amend a non-existent g. o. it is pointed ..... reduced to rs. 10 lakhs, so far as ifst loan is concerned the sales tax incentive granted in g.o. ms. no. 375, dated august 23, 1985, was not reduced. it is contended that act 20 of 1987 offends the provisions of article 14 and article 19(1)(g) of the constitution. 45. we do not think that the petitioner has raised .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1996(2)ALT633
..... that the legislature of the state of andhra pradesh passed the andhra pradesh private educational institutions grant-in-aid (regulation) act, 1988 (for short 'the act') which was given retrospective effect from 22-7-1985. the validity of that act was upheld by a division bench of this court by a judgment in w.a. no. 1961/88 and batch ..... petitioners is based on the orders issued in g.o.ms. no. 321 dated 24-7-1986 granting aid from 1st september, 1985. having regard to the provisions of section 3(1)(a) of the act referred to above, this claim cannot be recognised, muchless can be enforced by issuing a prerogative writ by this court.9. it ..... legislature passed the andhra pradesh private educational institutions grant-in-aid (regulation) act, 1988 which was published in the andhra pradesh gazette on august 29, 1988 (act 22/88). the act was brought into force with effect from 22nd july, 1985. section 3(1)(a) of the act which is relevant for our purpose reads as follows:'(a) no private educational .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1997(3)ALT380
..... offered in andhra pradesh for industrial development in backward areas. in that connection g.o.ms. no. 375, industries and commerce department, dated 23-8-1985 was issued whereby the industries which were to be initiated in the three classified backward areas, including anantapur district, were given incentives including the rebate of ..... or liability imposed by law.3. the government or even a private party cannot be compelled by invoking the principles of promissory estoppel to do an act prohibited by law.4. the legislature can never be precluded by invoking the principles of 'promissory estoppel' from exercising its legislative functions.'therefore, the doctrine ..... time etc. therefore, in such situation according to him, the respondents cannot be allowed to go back from such a promise regarding which the petitioner has acted suffering itself to lot of consequences which in law should be protected by operating the doctrine of 'promissory estoppel'. mr. anand reddy, the learned government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2005(5)ALD499; 2005(6)ALT165
..... collection of fees in the four markets of the kakinada municipality and road margin under section 289 of the andhra pradesh municipalities act for the year 1984-1985. the period of lease is from 1-4-1984 to 31-3-1985 and the bid amount is rs. 5,20,000/- besides the establishment charges. as per the terms and conditions of ..... defendant paid only rs. 30,000/- for october, 1984 and failed to pay november and december, 1984 instalments. the plaintiff adjusted the instalments of january, february and march, 1985 from the deposit that was made by the contractor. the defendant was not paying before the due date as such he is liable to the monthly instalments along with penal ..... interest at rs. 2.50ps p.m., is unsurious, penal and unconscionable under law. there was no contract to pay any interest to the plaintiff. on 18-3-1985, an application was submitted to the kakinada municipality claiming remission out of the total bid amount. the rice millers have not paid the fees payable by them as they .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2003(2)ALD126; [2003(97)FLR342]
..... petitioner, which is an industrial company, (hereinafter referred to as 'the management'), through orders dated 1-4-1982. his services were confirmed on 9-2-1985. the relationship between the workman and the management were not cordial. right from regularisation of services, there were disputes of one kind or the other. the ..... of the workman. 12. the labour court refused to decide the preliminary issue and directed the parties to proceed with the trial. 13. the industrial disputes act is a comprehensive enactment providing for resolution of industrial disputes through various mechanisms, such as, conciliation, arbitration, adjudication, etc. the respective agencies are created for ..... any provision like order xiv of cpc dealing with framing of issues or adjudication of preliminary issues, it is rather difficult to comprehend that the act contemplates raising of preliminary issues and decisions thereon in the proceedings before the labour courts. every objection as to question of fact or law is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1994(2)ALT515; (1995)ILLJ94AP
..... petitioner transport company. 16. the learned counsel for the 1st respondent has also referred to a decision of the kerala high court in esic, trichur v. pooppally foods, alleppey, 1985 (1) llj 10. in that case a firm carrying on business in export of prawns engaged a contractor for peeling and grading at the contractor's premises. it was ..... of the company. he therefore allowed the petition holding that the petitioner-transport company is not liable to pay contribution under e. s. i. act in respect of those people and ad hoc assessment order dated 6-12-1985 is invalid and without jurisdiction. 3. in this appeal mr. i. a. naidu, learned counsel for the appellant i.e., e. s. ..... petitioner are not employees as defined under section 2(9) of the e. s. i. act and therefore, the petitioner is not liable to pay contribution in respect of them and to set aside the ad hoc assessment made by the corporation on 6-12-1985. m/s. rajkamal transport, which is the petitioner in the lower court is a transport .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : [1997]104STC580(AP)
..... 1986, as pointed out earlier, the learned judges in that case dealt with sub-section (1) of section 20 as it was prior to its amendment by act 18 of 1985 because they were considering whether the commissioner of commercial taxes was right in setting aside the order of the deputy commissioner of commercial taxes dated june 21, 1982 ..... appeal no. 53 of 1984 dated february 9, 1988 is per incuriam because it did not notice the amendment effected to sub-section (1) of section 20 by act 18 of 1985. the division bench merely purported to follow the decision of the other division bench in gill & co. . the division bench held as follows : 'the question raised ..... taxes refusing to exercise his suo motu powers of revision at the instance of the assessee in his favour - much more so after it was amended by act 18 of 1985 restricting the exercise of revisional power of the commissioner of commercial taxes to only orders or proceedings 'prejudicial to the interests of revenue', as in the present case .....
Tag this Judgment!