Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: plantations labour act 1951 section 10 medical facilities Court: chennai Page 5 of about 371 results (0.058 seconds)

Vasanthi Nelson Vs. Antony Nelson Alias A.B.H. Nelson, Represented by ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)2MLJ369

..... as aforesaid. if the field workers of a estate over an extent of 330.77 acres, much less 120 acres of plantation crops were retrenched, it is obvious that the estate cannot be maintained. in addition to that, labour quarters, which were available in the estate were demolished and rooms were put up for the purpose of resort business, ..... 7,62,077/- has been paid during the year 2003-04 as retrenchment compensation to the workmen.24. it is not in dispute that the property was a plantation estate of coffee and pepper which has to be looked after with much care so as to get a reasonable yield and thereby make a profit after meeting out ..... to the undertaking given before this court in the earlier revision, committed acts of waste of the suit property - the estate - by retrenching the 50 workers employed for the purpose of maintenance of the coffee and pepper plantation; sold 50 cattle reared in the estate and demolished the labour quarters and converted it into a resort, which is being run in .....

N.Chinnavan Vs. the Management and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... petitioners did not deny the existence of ex.r.10 but claimed that they are excluded by the exception found under section 2(s) of the act.5. the labour court also relied upon the judgment of the gujarat high court in gujarat industrial co-operative bank limited -vs- d.g.jopan putra reported in 2005 ..... petitioners brought to the notice of this court the judgment in management, chennai central co-operative bank limited -vs- the joint commissioner of labour (appellate authority under the payment of gratuity act, 1972) and others reported in 2007 (2) ctc 604. it is the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners that in that ..... , which may be usefully reproduced below:- ''11. section 2(e) of the payment of gratuity act, 1972, defines 'employee' as follows:-''employee" means any person (other than an apprentice) employes on wages, in any establishment, factory, mine, oil-field plantation, port, railway company or shop, to do any skilled, semi-skilled or unskilled, manual, supervisory .....

The Management of Vijayashree Spinning Mills Ltd. by Its Director Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)IIILLJ697Mad

..... restored the second respondent to service. thereafter, when he was demanding the wages as per the special tribunal award, headed by k.e.varadhan, he was transferred to the plantation division at manavanur on 20.4.1993. the said place is 146 kms. away from the original place and it was done with a view to victimise the second ..... the relief of reinstatement with back-wages cannot be sustained. 10. it must be stated that by section 2(ra) of the act, 'unfair labour practices' have been set out in the v schedule of the industrial dispute act. in part i of the v schedule in item no. 7, transferring of workman mala fide from one place to another under ..... for at the transferred place, he was not allowed to enter the mill. though the management contended that the validity of the transfer order cannot be collaterally attacked, the labour court placing reliance upon certain decisions held that if the transfer order is passed with a view to victimise the workman, the court can go into the said issue .....

Michael Villavarayar and anr. Vs. the Workmen and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1962Mad205; [1962(4)FLR48]; (1961)IILLJ761Mad

..... of the valid termination of the services of these tindals as an industrial dispute to the labor court at madurai for adjudication under the industrial disputes act (central act xiv of 1947). before the labour court, the management urged as a preliminary ground that the court did not have jurisdiction but their objections were overruled and the court decided to ..... a direct or substantial interest--with whom they have, under the scheme of the act, a community of interest.' (12) in their judgment by a majority, their lordships of the supreme court repelled the view pressed on them that the medical officer of a tea plantation was a 'person' as defined above; and for that purpose they laid down ..... the test mentioned above. that test can, with advantage, be applied to find out whether a tindal in the present case will be a 'person' for purposes of ses. 2(k) of the act. (13) the discussion in .....

Michael Villavarayar and Anr. Vs. the Workmen, represented by the Secr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1962)1MLJ313

..... .o.'s referred the issue of the valid termination of the services of these tindals as an industrial dispute to the labour court at madurai for adjudication under the industrial disputes act (central act xiv of 1947). before the labour court, the management urged as a preliminary ground that the court did not have jurisdiction, but their objections were overruled ..... a direct or substantial interest--with whom they have, under the scheme of the act, a community of interest.in their judgment, by a majority, their lordships of the supreme court repelled the view pressed on them that the medical officer of a tea plantation was a 'person' as denied above; and for that purpose they laid down ..... the test mentioned above. that test can, with advantage, be applied to find out whether a tindal in the present case will be a 'person' for purpases of section 2(k) of the act.10. the discussion in the .....

The Management Vs. V.Rajendran

Court : Chennai

..... confirming the order dated 09.05.2011 passed in pg.no.72 of 2008 on the file of the controllilng authority under payment of gratuity act, the assistant commissioner of labour, salem, quash the same and further direct the respondents 2 and 3 to defer the payment of gratuity to the 1st respondent and consider ..... this juncture, it is relevant to extract section 13 of the payment of gratuity act, 1972, as follows: 13.protection of gratuity. - no gratuity payable under this act and no gratuity payable to an employee employed in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop exempted under section 5 shall be liable to attachment ..... in execution of any decree or order of any civil, revenue or criminal court. 6.section 13 of the payment of gratuity act gives protection to the gratuity earned by an employee .....

D. Ramasamy Vs. the Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR72]; (2003)ILLJ361Mad

..... the following two decisions:1.binay kumar chatterjee v. jugantar ltd. and others 1983 ii l.l.n.302.edwin a daniel and another v. labour court, coimbatore and another 1993 i l.l.n.169the only reason why the appellate authority has come to the conclusion thatthe petitioner was not an ..... an award was passed against the employee holding that the non-employment was justified. it isalso accepted by the labour court that the petitioner was not governed bysection 2( oo) of the industrial disputes act. his lordship justicem.srinivasan, as his lordship then was, came to the conclusion that theconfirmation was not ..... act. both the judgments were, therefore, notapposite to the controversy and the appellate authority has clearly erred inrelying upon them and holding that the petitioner was not an employee. theword 'employee' is defined in section 2(e) as follows:'2(e):- 'employee' means any person (other than an apprentice) employed on wages, in any establishment, factory, mine, oil-field, plantation .....

A.N. Anthony Packia Nadar Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1982]135ITR527(Mad)

..... from outside, tending, pruning, cutting, harvesting and rendering the produce fit for the market, would all be agricultural operations when taken in conjunction with basic operations. the human labour and skill spent in the performance of these subsequent operations cannot be said to have been spent on the land itself.' 3. in cit v. jyotikana chowdhurani : [1957 ..... assessees from the sale of sal trees of spontaneous growth was, therefore, not agricultural income under section 2(i) and 4(3)(viii) of the indian income-tax act, 1922.' 4. tested in the light of the principles set forth above i am of the opinion that no basic agricultural operations have been performed by the petitioner ..... derived from the cutting and sale of odai trees will fall within the meaning of agricultural income as defined in the tamil nadu agrl. i.t. act, 1955, hereinafter referred to as 'the act'. the commr. of agrl i.t. in his order, dated march 31, 1978, which is under challenge in this writ petition has stated that .....

Workmen Employed in Rob Roy Estates, Coonoor Vs. Presiding Officer,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1965Mad364

..... separate account for rob roy estate as for other units was maintained, wages to the workers in the estate were paid on the basis of plantation-industry-wise basis and like facts. but the labour court thought that hey wee not sufficient to hold that he estate was a separate and independent unit. taking the entire award,--i am therefore, ..... factory were not separate establishments; but the quarry was only another part of the establishment, namely, the factory within the meaning of s. 25-e(iii) of the industrial disputes act.(7) the question in pratap press v. their workmen, : (1960)illj497sc , related tot he claim of bonus made by workmen employed in one of each business carried on ..... may be difficult to discover the real thread of unity.'the case related to claim of compensation under s. 25-e read with s. 25-c of the industrial disputes act, and the question turned upon the interpretation of the words 'another part of the establishment' occurring in cl. (iii) of s. 25-e. in the absence of .....

Rajamani, Wife and Nominee of S. Rajagopalan (Since Deceased) and 8 Ot ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ1453Mad

..... as claimed by them and calculated the amount payable to each of the petitioners. however, on the management's appeal before the deputy commissioner of labour, the appellate authority reversed the order on the ground that non production of records relating to the period of service will not result in adverse ..... to go into the basic features of the payment of gratuity act, 1972. the payment of gratuity act, 1972 hereinafter referred to as the act is intended to provide for a scheme for the payment of gratuity to employees engaged in factories, mines, oilfields, plantations, ports, railway companies, shops or other establishments and for matters ..... etc. etc. , som prakash reikhi v. union of india , jeevanlal ltd. v. controlling authority, payment of gratuity act & others, 1986 (i) llj 86, pallavan transport corporation (metro), madras-2, v. presiding officer, i additional labour court, madras, t.k.krishnamurthy & others, 1984 (ii) llj 132. all the authorities have been categorical in their .....