Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: plantations labour act 1951 section 10 medical facilities Page 1 of about 10,934 results (0.194 seconds)

Aug 18 1992 (HC)

General Fibre Dealers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income T ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1993)47TTJ(Cal)118

..... that medical facilities are immediately available to the workers and their family members. sub-s. (2) of s. 10 of the plantations labour act, 1951 appears to be more rigorous that if medical facilities are not provided and maintained the chief inspector may cause to be provided and maintained therein such medical ..... iac (supra)] succour the assessee-company from the saddle of the first part of the aforesaid provision of s. 40a(9) of the act. sec. 10 of the plantations labour act, 1951 and r. 35 prescribed thereunder require the assessee-company, primarily it being a tea growing and manufacturing company, to provide and maintain hospitals so ..... that the assessee-company was to establish two separate hospitals, namely, suntok hospital and cherideo purbut hospital in view of s. 10 of the assam plantation labour act, 1951 and the rules prescribed thereunder. he stated that those two hospitals were being run by trusts wherein the trustees were from the employees and from the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2002 (HC)

New Ambadi Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(Mad)640; [2002]256ITR64(Mad)

..... appellant-company had provided mid-day meals to the estate workers.' the mere fact that the plantation labour act does not stipulate providing of mid-day meals to the labourers, it does not mean that mid-day meals cannot be provided to the labourers. therefore, disallowance of this expenditure is liable to be set aside and accordingly, it is ..... had spent rs. 93,934.89 for providing mid-day meals to the staff. the authorities disallowed this expenditure on the ground that the plantation labour act does not provide for mid-day meals to the labourers and hence, it is not an admissible expenditure. the appellate tribunal observed that 'providing mid-day meals to the ..... the petitioner-company had filed a return for the assessment year 1989-90, under the agricultural income tax act, 1955, showing a net income of rs. 65,23,215 from its plantation area. the income tax officer ii, nagercoil, disallowed certain expenses claimed by the petitioner and computed the net agricultural income at rs. 98,53, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2009 (HC)

Kerala Plantation Workers Federation and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2009(2)KLJ724

..... , has definitely to go. this court holds it accordingly and the stipulation of rs. 750/- as the maximum ceiling under section 2(k)(ii) of the plantation labour act, 1951 is declared as 'ultra vires' to the constitution of india in the present day context and hence., it is set aside. however, it is made clear ..... second respondent/state adds it point blank that, if the definition as it stands now is strictly taken into account, the workers of plantation would never get the protection of the plantation labour act, 1951.9. in this context, it is also relevant to note the observations already made by this court as to the callous inaction on ..... relevant provisions of law.2. the petitioners are the different trade unions registered under the trade unions act, representing the major work force in the plantations in the state of kerala, which come within the purview of the plantation labour act, 1951. it is contended that though the prescription of the ceiling of maximum wages under section 2(k)( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1967 (HC)

Vaikuntam Estate (Represented by S.S. Sarma, Former Superintendent, No ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)ILLJ93Mad

..... the nature of the benefits of umbrella, protective cloth, leave with wages, sickness allowance and maternity allowance, a reference to the plantations labour act, 1951, shows that these are benefit's made available to plantation labourers under the statute. the arbitrator has made it clear that he was mentioning these benefits as illustrations, and that what he ..... strike on 21 july 1958 and there was a reference for settlement of the dispute to adjudication under section 10(2) of the plantations labour act, 1951, and the award of the labour court in that connexion was published in the gazette on 20 april 1960. the management urged that the award would show that the ..... was whether any or all of the 42 workers referred to in the list attached are to be treated as permanent labourers and whether they are eligible to get the benefits under the plantations labour act, 1951.2. before the arbitrator both the workers and the management elaborated their claims. a reference to the claim statement on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2001 (HC)

Thangaraj P. Vs. Oothu Estate and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2002)ILLJ331Mad

..... disastrous and the net result will be to encourage encroachment of the petitioners' property and unauthorised construction of structures by the employee in total violation of the plantations labour act and the rules. thus i see every force in the above contentions raised by the petitioners herein.'8. we find every justification in the order of ..... everyone of the findings of the second respondent was not supported by any evidence on record and also not in consonance with the provisions of the plantations labour act and the rules framed thereunder. learned judge was pleased to hold as under in para. 11 of the order:'.... i see force in this argument also ..... appellant was not provided with the required residential quarters as required under the provisions of the plantations labour act and therefore there was nothing wrong in the appellant putting the construction on his own or his abode. the second respondent labour court; in fact, made a sweeping observation to the effect that in the estates it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

The Planters Association of Tamil Nadu. Vs. the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

..... 28.12.2006 and quash the same.order1. whether the action of the state government in notifying section 18 of the plantations labour act, 1951 (for short pl act) and directing appointment of welfare officers in respect of plantations engaging 300 or more workers by virtue of the impugned notification, dated 28.12.2006 is liable to be set aside ..... the counter, it was averred as follows : 10....it is submitted that section 18 of the plantations labour act 1951 provides for the appointment of welfare officers in plantations wherein 300 or more workers are employed. section 18(2) of the act gives powers to the state government to prescribe the duties, qualifications and conditions of service of the ..... while notifying the provisions of welfare officers in the state of tamilnadu, government of tamilnadu has taken permission under section 43(3) of the plantations labour act, 1951 from the government of india and vide this ministry's letter no.s-66012/1/2005-ir(pl) dated 28.02.2005, permission has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1967 (HC)

The Managment of the Vaikundan Estate, Represented by Sri S.S. Sarma, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ202

..... nature of the benefits of umbrella, protective cloth, leave with wages, sickness allowance and maternity allowance, a reference to the plantations labour act, 1951, shows that these are benefits made available to plantation labourers under the statute. the arbitrator has made it clear that he was mentioning these benefits as illustrations and that what he was ..... strike on 21st july, 1958, and there was a reference for settlement of the dispute to adjudication under section 10(2) of the plantations labour act, 1951, and the award of the labour court in that connection was published in the gazette on 20th april, 1960. the management urged that that award would show that the ..... whether any or all of the 42 workers referred to in the list attached are to be treated as permanent labourers and whether they are eligible lo get the benefits under the plantations labour act, 1951.2. before the arbitrator both the workers and the management elaborated their claims. a reference to the claim statement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 1978 (HC)

K.T. Thomas, Etc., Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1979)IILLJ290Ker

v.p. gopalan nambiyar, c.j.1. these writ petitions challenge the vires of section 1(5) of the plantations labour act, 1951, and the notification issued thereunder. the plantations labour act is an act passed by parliament to provide for the welfare of labour, and to regulate the conditions of work, in plantations. sub-sections (4) and (5) of section 1 are as follows:1. short title, extent, commencement and ..... /-section officer.appendixnotificationg.o. ms. no. 75/72/lbrdated, trivandrum, 19.8.72in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (5) of section 1 of the plantations labour act, 1951 (central act 69 of 1951), the government of kerala hereby declare that all the provisions of the said act shall apply to each and every component part of any land to which the provisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2010 (HC)

Tata Tea Limited, Velonie Estate Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Represent ...

Court : Chennai

..... made for supplying drinking water to the workers in the field. (labour investigation committee (main report), (1946) : page 153.)ii. plantation labour gets legal protection:2.1. the agony of plantation workers (otherwise known as tea garden labours) was sought to be remedied only after india became a republic in the form of plantation labour act, 1951. the act for the first time attempted to provide certain minimum safeguards in ..... respect of health and welfare of plantation labours. the act provides for certain statutory service conditions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2000 (HC)

R.L. Rikhye Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... pp, assam appearing for the state respondents. 3. this case arose out of a complaint filed by the respondent no. 2 medical inspector under the plantation labour act. 1951 before the sdjm. biswanath chariali on 25.8.1992 stating, inter alia, that on 5.6.1992 he inspected boroi tea estate and found that the ..... case, according to the inspector, the employer was liable to be prosecuted under section 36 of the plantation labour act, 1951. he obtained sanction for prosecution as contemplated by section 39 of the act from the chief inspector of plantation and filed a complaint before the chief judicial magistrate. darrang naming the petitioner and one mr. kalid ..... .c. saikia, manager, boroi tea estate violated sections 26 and 27 of the plantation labour act. 1951 by failing to produce certificate of fitness for non-adult worker of the plantation and also violated the provisions of rule 76 of the assam plantation labour rules, 1956 by not maintaining the register of non-adult workers in form no .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //