Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: plantations labour act 1951 section 10 medical facilities Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 201 results (0.084 seconds)

Aug 18 1992 (HC)

General Fibre Dealers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income T ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1993)47TTJ(Cal)118

..... that medical facilities are immediately available to the workers and their family members. sub-s. (2) of s. 10 of the plantations labour act, 1951 appears to be more rigorous that if medical facilities are not provided and maintained the chief inspector may cause to be provided and maintained therein such medical ..... iac (supra)] succour the assessee-company from the saddle of the first part of the aforesaid provision of s. 40a(9) of the act. sec. 10 of the plantations labour act, 1951 and r. 35 prescribed thereunder require the assessee-company, primarily it being a tea growing and manufacturing company, to provide and maintain hospitals so ..... that the assessee-company was to establish two separate hospitals, namely, suntok hospital and cherideo purbut hospital in view of s. 10 of the assam plantation labour act, 1951 and the rules prescribed thereunder. he stated that those two hospitals were being run by trusts wherein the trustees were from the employees and from the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 2005 (HC)

Kharibari Tea Company Limited and anr. Vs. West Bengal State Electrici ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN610

..... in clause (j) of section 2 of the mines act, 1952 (35 of 1952); or(iii) a 'plantation' as defined in clause(f) of section 2 of the plantations labour act, 1951 (69 of 1951).]19. under section 2(j) of industrial disputes act, the plantation as defined in said plantations labour act, 1951, also has been declared as industry.20. the aforesaid ..... word 'industry' to be considered from the industrial disputes act, 1947 as well as from the plantations labour act, 1951. section 1(4)(a) and sections 2(f) and 2(k) of plantations labour act have provided the applicability of the said act in respect of the labourers engaged in the plantation work of growing tea, coffee etc. the relevant ..... establishment has been meant for said section as well as sections 25c, 25d and 25e as a plantation as defined in clause(f) of section 2 of the plantations labour act, 1951. section 25a of the industrial disputes act reads to this effect:25a. application of sections 25c to 25e.--(1) sections 25c to 25e inclusive .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 2008 (HC)

Hotel Hindusthan International Karmachari Union Vs. Hotel Hindusthan I ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN567,[2008(119)FLR545],(2009)ILLJ747Cal

..... ' means - (i) a factory as defined in clause (m) of section 2 of the factories act, 1948 or (ii) a mine as defined in clause (i) of section 2 of the mines act, 1952 or (iii) plantation as defined in clause (f) of section 2 of the plantation labour act, 1951.15. the parties appearing before us agreed in principle that 'hotel' is an industry within the ..... meaning of trade union act as well as industrial disputes act. on a combined reading of the aforesaid provisions if we take .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 2006 (HC)

Hotel Hindustan International Employee's and Workers' Union Vs. State ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN188

..... (63 of 1948); or(ii) a mine as defined in clause (j) of section 2 of the mines act, 1952 (35 of 1952); or(iii) a plantation as defined in clause (f) of section 2 of the plantations labour act, 1951 (69 of 1951).section 2(m) - 'factory' means any premises including the precincts thereof-(i) whereon ten or more workers are ..... unions.16. mr. ghosh, learned advocate, appearing for the hotel practically took an identical stand before this court with regard to applicability of chapter iiia of the said act to the said hotel.17. mr. majumdar, learned advocate, appearing for the respondent no. 3, supported the ultimate conclusion which was arrived at by the registrar of ..... in favour of the respondent no. 3.15. mr. bandopadhyay submitted that in the event it is held by this court that chapter iiia of the said act is applicable to hotel hindusthan international, then an opportunity be given to the petitioner to submit the requisite application before the prescribed authority, so that the petitioner can .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2016 (HC)

State of West Bengal and Anr Vs. Lakshmi Kanta Hazra and Anr

Court : Kolkata

..... salient feature of scheme in clause-1, which reads as follows: 1.(i)the industrial units should be factories and plantations registered under the factories act, 1948 and the plantation labour act, 1951 in west bengal. even assuming that in the aforesaid clause only the tea gardens workers are included through the addendum ..... that the state correctly awarded benefits to different classes of workers who are similarly situated. in industrial units registered under the factories act, 1948 and in the plantations labour act, 1951 working conditions of workers are absolutely different in nature. therefore, the learned trial judge notification has dated committed 4th an june ..... respondents has submitted that the learned single judge has rightly noted the fact that the workers plantations of industrial registered under units the and the factories workers act, 1948 of the and the plantations labour act, 1951 respectively have been discriminated by the addendum dated june 10, 2015 by which tea garden .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1993 (HC)

Executive Engineer, Electricity Dept., Rural Division Vs. Shri Chandra ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ964Cal

..... vb of the industrial disputes act and upon section 25l. he has contended that section 25l is not at all ..... ) a factory as defined in clause (m) of section 2 of the factories act, i 948; (ii) a mine as defined in clause (j) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the mines act. 1952; or (iii) a plantation as defined in clause (f) of section 2 of the plantations labour act, 1951; 8. mr. ray appearing for the applicant has laid much emphasis upon chapter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2015 (HC)

Tongani Tea Company Limited Vs. Rossell India Limited

Court : Kolkata

..... sold, transferred and conveyed, inter alia, all that the jhargaon land and also all that the betnal land in its entirety both together with tea plantation, garden, factory, bunglow, staff quarters.labour line, building, erections, plant & machinery, tools, equipments, furniture, fittings & furnishings and properties & rights thereto unto and in favour of tongani ..... vendor12) all parties including the concerned office of the registrar of assurances in assam being sdo, civil, tamulpur sub division, dist: baksa (btad).shall act in terms of the signed copy of the minutes of this order. certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject ..... this day of , 2015 between tongani tea company limited, (earlier known as derby tea & industries ltd.) a company within the meaning of the companies act, 2013 and having its registered office at 3rd floor, 15 b, hemanta basu sarani, kolkata 700 001, hereinafter called the vendor (which includes its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2010 (HC)

Sailen Seth Vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... case. it is futile to compare the provisions of the payment of gratuity act 1972 with those of the contract labour ( regulation and abolition) act 1970. the former act was enacted with an object to 'provide for a scheme for the payment of gratuity to employees engaged in factories, mines, oilfields, plantations, ports, railway companies, shops or other establishments and for matters connected therewith or ..... incidental thereto' whereas the latter act was enacted with an object to 'regulate the employment of contract labour in certain establishments and to provide for its abolition in certain circumstances and for matters connected .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 1998 (HC)

The Central Agricultural Research Institute and anr. Vs. the Presiding ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1998)3CALLT209(HC)

..... of their claim towards back wages.'3 the concerned 42 workmen of the central agricultural research institute, port blair were represented before the labour court through their union, namely, the plantation crops workers union, the said reference was contested by the management, namely, the management of the central agricultural research institute. in the ..... infer alia stated that the supreme court in the decision in bangalore water supply had, while interpreting the definition of 'industry' as contained in the act. observed that government might restructure this definition by suitable legislative measure, and it was accordingly proposed to redefind the term 'industry'. it was also stated ..... was taken before the labour court. in support of his such contentions the learned advocate for the petitioner has also referred to a number of supreme court and other decisions, such as, attorney general v. j.p. bayly. air 1950 pc 73; united commercial bank v. their workmen. : (1951)illj621sc : board of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2004 (HC)

Rubber Board Vs. General Secretary, Saithankari Plantation Workers' Un ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2004(2)CHN315,(2004)IIILLJ442Cal

..... the above purposes of imparting training to the farmers lost its relevance andviability and as such the petitioner came to the firm conclusion that running acommercial plantation and that too in just 200 hectors is apart from beingunviable, not a function of the rubber board. therefore, on overall considerationof the matter ..... the lt. governor for prior permission under section 25n, but subsequently, without following the required procedure they received the impugned order from the assistant secretary (labour), andaman & nicobar administration, whereby any whereunder it was communicated to them that the permission as sought for has not been granted to them and as ..... the learned single judge has failed to appreciate the fact that the statutory obligation and formalities stipulated under section 25n(3) of the industrial disputes act were not complied with before passing the impugned order refusing permission for retrenchment. it was also alleged that the learned single judge was also misguided .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //