Plain Error - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Vonn

Court: US Supreme Court

..... without objection are relieved of the burden on silent defendants generally under the plain error rule to show the error plain prejudicial and disreputable to the judicial system but of course this is not ..... such an assertion and the reported cases cited by the committee never mentioned the plain error harmless error distinction we think rather that the significance of congress s choice to adopt a .....

United States Vs. Cotton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the indictment s failure to allege a fact that increased the sentences was plain error but even assuming the error affected respondents substantial rights it did not seriously affect the fairness integrity or ..... the view that indictment omissions deprive a court of jurisdiction we proceed to apply the plain error test of federal rule of criminal procedure 52 b to respondents forfeited claim see united .....

Mickens Vs. Taylor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s objection requirement to the general rule that in the absence of plain error litigants get no relief from error without objection the government as amicus argues for making a formal objection ..... ineffective assistance generally must demonstrate a reasonable probability that but for counsel s unprofessional errors the result of the proceeding would have been different strickland v washington 466 u .....

Ring Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... prisoners will be unable to satisfy the standards of harmless error or plain error review or because having completed their direct appeals they will ..... leaves it to lower courts to pass on the harmlessness of error in the first instance 610 justice scalia with whom justice ..... override jury verdicts for life are especially likely to commit serious errors cf epstein king the rules of inference 69 u chi .....

Samtel Color Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 99(2002)DLT764

..... income or loss declared in the returned namely i any arithmetical errors in the return accounts or documents accompanying it shall be ..... less or excessive and are ex facie not allowable on a plain reading of the relevant section without there being any scope ..... interpreting it is an error a fault a misunderstanding a misconception apparent means visible capable of being seen obvious plain it means open .....

Samtel Colour Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2002)177CTR(Del)289

..... income or loss declared in the return namely i any arithmetical errors in the return accounts or documents accompanying it shall be ..... less or excessive and are ex facie not allowable on a plain reading of the relevant section without there being any scope ..... interpreting it is an error a fault a misunderstanding a misconception apparent means visible capable of being seen obvious plain it means open to .....

Bell Vs. Cone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... counsel s performancefailing to adduce mitigating evidence and waiving closing argumentare plainly of the same ilk as other specific attorney errors subject to strickland s performance and prejudice components see e g ..... to adduce mitigating evidence and the waiver of closing argument are plainly of the same ilk as other specific attorney errors we have held subject to strick 4 in concluding that .....

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Karan Singh Binayak and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1543; JT2002(3)SC324; 2002(3)SCALE108; (2002)4SCC188; [2002]2SCR620

..... judge in view of the plain and unambiguous language of the provisions of the act was in error in introducing the condition of ..... well accepted principle of interpretation of statutory provisions that if the plain language of the section is clear or unambiguous it is ..... a court to interpret it giving a meaning different from the plain grammatical meaning of the provision 26 suburban agriculture dairy s .....

Devender Pal Singh Vs. State, N.C.T. of Delhi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC886; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)738; 95(2003)CLT708(SC); 2003CriLJ918; JT2002(10)SC377; (2003)2SCC501; [2002]SUPP5SCR332; 2003(1)LC259(SC)

..... of the record and if apparent error is here correction becomes necessitous 35 the purpose is plain the language is elastic and interpretation ..... justice is above all it is exercised to remove the error and not for disturbing finality when the constitution was framed ..... routine procedure only allowed if court is satisfied that material error manifest on the face of the order resulting in miscarriage .....

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Prestress Products (India)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(2)ARBLR624(Bom); 2003(3)BomCR117

..... so the court would regard any error in construction as one within jurisdiction the arbitrator has plainly not considered the effect of ..... case of the petitioner is that there was a typographical error in the contractual specification according to the petitioner the provision ..... claim of the municipal corporation that there was a typographical error in the contractual specification here again i am of the .....