Skip to content


Plain Error - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: plain error Year: 1955 Page 1 of about 72 results (0.095 seconds)
Oct 31 1955 (SC)

Willie (William) Slaney Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-31-1955

Reported in: AIR1956SC116; 1956CriLJ291; (1956)IMLJ100(SC); [1955]2SCR1140

..... that in our opinion is reasonably plain language 28 next sections 226 and 227 show that errors in a charge and even the ..... 33 the explanation is also important in determining whether any error omission or irregularity in any proceeding under this code has ..... this contravention of the code comes within the description of error omission or irregularity 94 subsequently however there have been systematic .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 1955 (SC)

The Bengal Immunity Company Limited Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-06-1955

Reported in: AIR1955SC661; [1955]2SCR603; [1955]6STC446(SC)

..... consuming public on an interpretation of the constitution which appears to us to be plainly erroneous it has given rise to considerable inconvenience and hardship to business people who ..... the desirability of continuity of decision in constitutional questions however when convinced of former error this court has never felt constrained to follow precedent in constitutional questions where correction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 1955 (HC)

The State Vs. Andheri-marol-kurla Bus Service

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-04-1955

Reported in: AIR1955Bom324; (1955)57BOMLR529; 1955CriLJ1161; ILR1955Bom602; (1955)ILLJ378Bom

..... report made by the conciliation officer is received by the appropriate government and that is plainly inconsistent with the view that the proceeding before the conciliation officer must automatically come to ..... are over therefore in our opinion the learned chief presidency magistrate was with respect in error in holding that the proceedings before the conciliation officer became invalid as soon as 14 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 1955 (FN)

Sec Vs. Drexel and Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-28-1955

..... extremely hostile eye to deny the commission that administrative leeway the error of the court of appeals was in overlooking the essential ..... thereunder the broad powers granted the commission under these provisions are plainly adequate to give it the control it reserved in this ..... persons affected the amount of fees to be paid by electric plainly would be relevant to the question whether the plan was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 1955 (HC)

Kanumarlapudi Lakshminaryana Chetty and Others Vs. First Additional In ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-09-1955

Reported in: [1956]29ITR419(AP)

..... the line at which the words of the section cease to be plain the same rule of construction leaning against retrospectivity should be applied ..... the basis of the final assessment of the firm was an error apparent from the record of the earlier assessment for it designedly ..... the basis of the final assessment of the firm was an error apparent from the record of the earlier assessment for it designedly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1955 (HC)

Roshan Lal Vs. Bhuramal

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-04-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Raj25

..... to receive from his client the language of the section is plain enough and it provides that a legal practitioner in india shall ..... hesitation in saying that the courts below have fallen into grave error in applying those sections to the present case the principle is ..... hesitation in saying that the courts below have fallen into grave error in applying those sections to the present case the principle is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 1955 (FN)

Williamson Vs. Lee Optical, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-28-1955

care of the eyes an optometrist examines eyes for refractive error recognizes but does not treat diseases of the eye and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 04 1955 (SC)

Pritam Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-04-1955

Reported in: AIR1956SC415; 1956CriLJ805

..... w 2 were police constables who were going to jhabal in the same lorry in plain clothes dial singh son of chanan singh orara also was examined and he deposed that ..... about 95 per cent of the witnesses failed to identify him if the margin of error was thus taken into account the evidence of gurdip singh and dial singh alone could .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 1955 (FN)

Bart Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-23-1955

..... permit me to advise my client that mr tavenner counsel is in error in his interpretation of the constitution so far as the fifth amendment ..... this committee has no right no right let me make it plain mr walter under our procedure the attorney is permitted to advise his ..... unger i think again mr chairman mr bart has indicated very plainly he has not been contumacious in any regard he states his name .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 1955 (HC)

indrajitsinghji Vijaysinghji Vs. Rajendrasinghji Vijaysinghji

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-17-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Bom45; (1955)57BOMLR962; ILR1955Bom912

..... it is true that the expression may be sued in its plain ordinary meaning may have wider connotation it may mean to claim ..... government of india act and we gave to that expression its plain natural meaning but as we have pointed out that expression has ..... civil procedure code in our opinion therefore with respect the learned judge was in error when i he took the view that the defendant was protected .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //