Skip to content


Plain Error - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: plain error Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 187 results (0.154 seconds)
May 13 1963 (FN)

Namet Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-13-1963

..... irregularity or variance which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded b plain error plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the ..... supra that a failure to give proper curative instructions when such elements are present constitutes plain error footnote 11 the issue was brought to this court s attention in the government s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 1963 (FN)

Lopez Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-27-1963

..... 2d 9 nor was there on this score any such plain error in the charge affecting substantial rights as would warrant reversal ..... that offer is a constitutionally protected communication once it is plain that davis could properly testify about his conversation with ..... law enforcement but even without empirical studies it must be plain that electronic surveillance imports a peculiarly severe danger to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1963 (SC)

The University of Mysore and anr. Vs. C.D. Govinda Rao and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-26-1963

Reported in: AIR1965SC491; [1964]4SCR575

..... did not satisfy the first qualification the high court is plainly in error the judgment shows that the learned judges concentrated on the ..... appointment of appellant no 2 on the ground that it was plain that he did not satisfy the first qualification in this ..... indian university he did not satisfy the first qualification it is plain that master s degree of the durham university which appellant no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 02 1963 (FN)

Fahy Vs. Connecticut

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-02-1963

..... often be more prejudicial than erroneously admitted unconstitutional evidence since the harmless error rule plainly affords no shield under which prosecutors might use damaging evidence unconstitutionally obtained ..... omitted and the statute remained essentially unchanged thereafter the connecticut supreme court of errors held that injure includes defacement and thus includes petitioner s acts mr .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 1963 (HC)

Namdeo Chimnaji Tapre and anr. Vs. Govinddas Ratanlal Bhatia and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-11-1963

Reported in: AIR1964Bom137; (1963)65BOMLR843; ILR1964Bom114; 1964MhLJ51

..... the error consists of it is pretty plain to us that it is not the sort of error which is referred to as substantial error in ..... electoral rolls and where necessary direct that any clerical or printing error in the said entries shall be overlooked section 36 of ..... the third is clear the second requirement is directed to correcting errors in the nomination paper whereas the third requirement contained in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 28 1963 (FN)

Bartone Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-28-1963

..... judgment denying correction of the sentence is reversed since the error in enlarging the sentence in the absence of petitioner was plain in light of the requirements of federal rule of criminal ..... by one procedure or another is not our concern this error in enlarging the sentence in the absence of petitioner was so plain in light of the requirements of rule 43 footnote .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1963 (FN)

Draper Vs. Washington

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-18-1963

..... summarized in several paragraphs his contrary interpretation of the evidence which according to him plainly established the defendants guilt in his argument he undertook to refute each of ..... stating these factual conclusions the judge specifically rejected each of petitioners 12 assignments of error with a summary statement almost wholly conclusory concerning each petitioners sought review by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 1963 (HC)

State Vs. Premchand Kubchand

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-22-1963

Reported in: AIR1964Bom155; (1963)65BOMLR870; 1964CriLJ660; ILR1964Bom257; 1964MhLJ102

..... and is to take a view which is not warranted by the plain language used ir the clause the error into which the learned magistrate has fallen is to assume that because ..... our opinion the words used in clause b of section 8 must be given their plain grammatical meaning and there is no warrant for restricting the operation of that clause so .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 1963 (FN)

Johnson Vs. Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-29-1963

..... court of appeals of virginia refused to grant a writ of error on the ground that the judgment appealed from was plainly right but the chief justice of that court stayed execution .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 09 1963 (SC)

Syed Yakoob Vs. K.S. Radhakrishnan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-09-1963

Reported in: AIR1964SC477; [1964]5SCR64

..... of the record whether or not an impugned error is an error of law and an error of law which is apparent on the face ..... certiorari in all these cases the impugned conclusion should be so plainly inconsistent with the relevant statutory provision that no difficulty is experienced ..... 1 did not own a workshop a t chidambaram would be plainly unreasonable when it is remembered that the evidence disclosed a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //