Skip to content


Plain Error - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: plain error Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 248 results (0.282 seconds)
May 23 1983 (FN)

United States Vs. Hasting

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-23-1983

..... the court rule 34 1 a at its option however the court may consider a plain error not among the questions presented but evident from the record and otherwise within its jurisdiction ..... however significant in the context of this case if as the court of appeals plainly implied the errors alleged are harmless supervisory power to reverse a conviction is not needed as a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 08 1983 (FN)

illinois Vs. Gates

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-08-1983

..... select and controversial instances in which the court has reversed a state court decision for plain error footnote 2 1 we have consistently dismissed for want of jurisdiction where the federal claim ..... faith exception to the exclusionary rule our consideration of whether to modify the exclusionary rule plainly would benefit from a record containing such facts likewise due regard for the appropriate .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 1983 (FN)

illinois Vs. Andreas

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-05-1983

..... somehow made less than certain his knowledge of the container s contents this was plain error where law enforcement authorities are cooperating in an investigation as here the knowledge of ..... lawfully invaded privacy rights this conclusion is supported by the reasoning underlying the plain view doctrine the plain view doctrine authorizes seizure of illegal or evidentiary items visible to a police .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1983 (FN)

Arizona Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-30-1983

..... the special master s determinations regarding the irrigability of particular parcels although formal concepts of plain error and abuse of discretion do not apply to the recommendations of special masters in original ..... the united states and the tribes that this provision grants us power to correct certain errors to determine reserved questions and if necessary to make modifications in the decree we .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1983 (FN)

Rushen Vs. Spain

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-12-1983

..... of all of the jurors and a violation of that right is plainly not susceptible to a harmless error analysis see tumey v ohio 273 u s 510 1927 justice marshall ..... therefrom the california court of appeal affirmed holding that although the communications constituted federal constitutional error they were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt however respondent subsequently obtained habeas corpus relief in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 1983 (HC)

Labh Singh and ors. Vs. Piara Singh and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-07-1983

Reported in: AIR1984P& H270

..... certainly cannot be taken to satisfy the mandatory provisions of section 63 an error of lavi has therefore been plainly committed by the lower appellate court by considering the execution of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 22 1983 (FN)

Zant Vs. Stephens

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-22-1983

..... with appreciable support i agree with the court that the stromberg rule is plainly distinguishable since the jury explicitly returned two concededly valid aggravating circumstances thereby conclusively ..... although our prior decisions are not completely consistent regarding the effect of constitutional error in sentencing proceedings on the sentence imposed on the defendant in general sentencing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 1983 (TRI)

Stretchlon Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-29-1983

Reported in: (1983)(14)ELT2076TriDel

..... of hosiery or hosiery fabrics 11 he also pointed out the error in the observations made by the appellate collector that the ..... find force in the contention raised by the appellants because a plain reading of clause 1 of this notification makes it abundantly clear ..... is not circumscribed by any restrictions such as were reliable to errors etc the assessees are entitled to claim refund in terms of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 27 1983 (HC)

B.K. Suthar Vs. State and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jan-27-1983

Reported in: (1983)2GLR932

..... on other grounds should be referred to the competent authority on the plain reading of the rule therefore it is manifestly clear that the ..... of application made for correction of entry on ground of apparent clerical error in other words the amended rule 171 prescribes for the period ..... corporation ahmedabad 1977 18 g l r 656 3 in the plain reading of amended rule 171 it is manifestly clear that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 08 1983 (HC)

Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Bhopal Vs. State Gove ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-08-1983

Reported in: AIR1984MP64

..... to be directory the special secretary did not commit any juris dictional error in holding that this requirement had to be complied with learned counsel ..... scheme and not newspaper this construction is not borne out from a plain reading of section 68 d 1 of the act if this were ..... d 1 of the motor vehicles act i have noted that the plain construction is that the publication should be in a newspaper in a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //