Perusal - Judgment Search Results
“a Perusal of Judgment Passed by Court Below Shows Vs. Smt. Pushpa L ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
Even regular second appeal was dismissed by the court. Operative part whereof reads as under:- C.R.No.2137 o”2. “A perusal of judgment passed by court below shows that it merely held that appellant is entitled to interest prevailing
“as Per Perusal of Copy of Mlr Placed on Record Pw1 Jogender Vs. Sta ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
virtue of impugned judgment of acquittal dated 11.6.2012, which, in substance, is as under (para 14):- “As per perusal of copy of MLR placed on record, PW1 Jogender complainant received only one injury 3x2 cm. on middle
“perusal of the File Shows That the Incident Has Been Mentioned as V ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
CRM not M-1318 of 2013 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM not M-1318 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.1.2013 Balwan & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Jagdish Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“perusal of File Reveals That the Star Witness of This Case Vs. Amar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
CRM No.38730 of 2012 in/and CRM-A No.507-MA of 2012 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM No.38730 of 2012 in and CRM-A No.507-MA of 2012 Date of decision :10. 12.2012...
“a Perusal of the Report Prepared by the Tehsildar (on Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
counsel for the parties and, after considering the above contentions, passed the following order on 06.02.2013: - “A perusal of the report prepared by the Tehsildar (on special duty).available at page 41 of the file, reveals that
“4. After Perusing the Record of the Appellant It Is Quite Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
the appeal filed by the petitioner, the following observations had been made by the Appellate Authority: “4. After perusing the record of the appellant, it is quite evident that the Punishing Authority complied with the requisite procedure
We Have Perused the Status Reports Filed Alongwith the Bar Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
Advocate General, Haryana. Mr.Sanjay Kaushal, Sr.Standing Counsel for Union Territory, Chandigarh. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) We have perused the status reports filed alongwith the bar chart. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has also
“a Perusal of Record Shows That the Complainant Has Also Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
application, after contest, was dismissed by the trial court vide order dated 12.09.2006 by observing as under: “A perusal of record shows that the complainant has also filed previous application on 8.1.2001 u/s 190 Cr.P.C.for summoning accused
“perusal of File Reveals That Vide Application Dated 28.10.2013 Plai ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
permission for amendment of plaint vide application dated 28.10.2013. The application was eventually allowed vide order dated 15.2.2014. Perusal of order dated 15.2.2014, vide which plaintiff was allowed to amend the plaint reveals that the only amendment
a Perusal of the Impugned Order Dated 28.3.2014 at Annexure Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-05-2014
pre-arrest bail had acted on any irrelevant material or if there has been a non-application of mind. A perusal of the impugned order dated 28.3.2014 at Annexure P-1 would reveal that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free