Personal Use - Judgment Search Results

Bush Vs. Person

Court: US Supreme Court

there any incongruity with established principles in holding that the personal discharge of the debtor does not free him from the

Tainwala Personal Care Products Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC642

1. When the petition for stay came up for hearing it was agreed by both sides that the appeal can...

Personal Manager, Sbi and anr. Vs. Krishna Grameena Bank Employees Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)KarLJ62; (2008)ILLJ894SC; 2007(3)SCALE575; 2007AIRSCW7669; 2008–I-LLJ-894; 2008LabIC474; 2007(8)Supreme675; 2008(2)KLJ62; 2008(1)AIRKarR330

employees of the Regional Rural Banks will be entitled to claim parity with the officers and other employees of the sponsor

The Manager Personal Banking Division State Bank of India, Madras, Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)2MLJ280

restored on the file of the learned IV Assistant City Civil Judge, Madras, with a direction to try the suit and

Tainwala Personal Care Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Royal Sundaram Alliance ...

Court: Mumbai

................But as soon as there is a rejection of the claim and not the raising of a dispute as to the But the arbitration clause, restricted as it is by the use of the words "if any difference arises as to the

M/S. Personality Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise Bangal ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Per P. Karthikeyan This is an appeal filed by M/s. Personality Ltd., Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore. The impugned order sustained the order show that the knitted or crocheted fabrics the assessee had used to manufacture the impugned articles of apparel during the material

The Authorized Person Coca-cola Company Products Ltd., Atmakuru Villag ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

marked. On behalf of the opposite party no.1, its authorized person has filed affidavit and did not choose to file any that her son is married and living separately and he used to purchase cool drinks from her shop. 5. The complainant

Private Secretaries/Personal Assistants Brotherhood and Another Vs. St ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2000(1)AWC457; (2000)1UPLBEC357

with the approval of the Governor.4. The Private Secretaries and Personal Assistants Brotherhood filed a Writ Petition Bearing No. 1408 of

a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

their extraordinary powers under Article 226 in the case of persons who do not approach it expeditiously for relief and who

“a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

be relevant and the same are in the following terMs.A person aggrieved by an order of promoting a junior over his