Payment Of Wages Act 1936 Section 24 - Judgment Search Results

F.W. Heilgers and Co. Vs. Nagesh Chandra Chakravarty

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1950)52BOMLR23

of work done during any particular period the claim to payment of such sum would be wages under the definition of reasoning omits to consider the scheme of the payment of wages act and the words used in the definition of wages omits to consider the scheme of the payment of wages act and the words used in the definition of wages in of respondent no 2 payment of wages act iv of 1936 sections 2 20 23 indiwtrial disputes act xiv of 1947 agreement which was advantageous or beneficial to them 3 in section 2 pi of that act wages is denned as follows

Rura Ram Vs. Divisional Supdt., N.W. Rly., Lahore

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1954P& H298

suspension therefore by the watch committee does involve suspension of payment by them as well as of the performance of the a rule empowering the railway company concerned to withhold the wages of the plaintiff during the period of his suspension the under sub section 2 of s 241 government of india act 1935 governing the services of railway servants subject to the the said bank on 7 11 1935 on 25 5 1936 the board of directors adopted a resolution dismissing him from rules made by the governor general in council under sub section 2 of s 241 government of india act 1935 governing governor general in council under sub section 2 of s 241 government of india act 1935 governing the services of railway

Commissioner Vs. Wodehouse

Court : US Supreme Court

..... sec 147 information at source a payments of 1 000 or more all persons in whatever capacity acting ..... on the banking business dividends rents salaries wages premiums annuities compensations remunerations emoluments or other ..... meaning and established usage therefore after the 1936 amendments it became equally clear that these ..... 2 4 that section deals with gross incomes of more than 24 000 received by .....

In Re: Thammineni Santhanamma and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1956)2MLJ74

accused than one permit any one to appear plead or act for such other in any criminal proceeding the present case private complaint was laid against them and their husbands under sections 147 and 352 indian penal code the magistrate dismissed an

In Re: Ponnuswami

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1950Mad308

in default further simple imprisonment for two months time for payment of the fine till 11 a m on 15th december death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide once that is proved but not gulity of negligence he would not be liable under section 304a penal code the fact that the victim also contributed

Varindmal Vs. Radha Krishna and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1949CriLJ634

for two hours he was eventually released on bail after payment of es 60 as bribe to the police officers 3 prosecutor pointed out that under section 6 prevention of corruption act 1947 act ii 2 of 1917 no court could take 2 yarindmal the petitioner before me filed s complaint under sections 312 506 323 and 161 penal code against radha krishna

Sarkar Vs. Jalamsingh

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1950Raj28

a lad of 15 or 16 yearsof age and the act indulged in by him to baythe least was the result it may be pointed out that in a case under section 562 1 criminal p c the magistrate does not pass

Ram Lal Vs. Rex

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1950Raj17; 1950CriLJ920

undergo six months rigorous imprisonment under section 10 of central act ii 2 of 1930 the applicant pleaded guilty the charge of such to further undergo six months rigorous imprisonment under section 10 of central act ii 2 of 1930 the applicant

Kuppuswami Asari Vs. Manickasari

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1949)2MLJ126

any way altered by the hindu law of inheritance amendment act ii of 1929 this is the only point that has both in its preamble and in sub section 2 of section 1 to succession to the property of a male and

The Public Prosecutor Vs. B. Nagamma

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1949)2MLJ405

madras act iii of 1918 the madras prevention of adulteration act the district health officer as local executive officer can delegate file of the stationary sub magistrate jammalmadugu a case under section 5 1 d of the madras food adulteration act for