Payment Of Wages Act 1936 Section 24 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: payment of wages act 1936 section 24 Year: 1937 Page 1 of about 547 results (1.696 seconds)Jonabali Sardar and ors. Vs. Sm. Saleha Khatun and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-11-1937
Reported in : AIR1938Cal257
and the declaration and the surrounding circumstances are equivocal subsequent acts and conduct if they throw any light on the real tossadak hossain on 10th asar 1324 b s corresponding to 24th june 1917 the courts below have dismissed the suit hence
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarihar and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jul-31-1937
Reported in : AIR1938All11
passed by a magistrate in a case under the gambling act that the money found on the persons of the six order is clearly in the teeth of the provisions of section 13 u p gambling act for by no stretch of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.C. Krishnan Nambiar Vs. the Municipal Prosecutor
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-14-1937
Reported in : AIR1938Mad709; (1938)2MLJ31
governed by section 345 and not section 347 of the act the prosecution was commenced within three years and there is district municipalities act are governed by section 345 and not section 347 of the act the prosecution was commenced within three
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Kameswara Aiyar and anr. Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Co ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-28-1937
Reported in : 173Ind.Cas.534; (1937)2MLJ345
each case will be entitled to his costs time for payment is three months 4 leave to appeal is refused on came to his lands through his customary sluice without any act of his own 3 the second appeals are allowed and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMuhammad Bakhsh Vs. Bohra Ram Prasad and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-08-1937
Reported in : 171Ind.Cas.367
had not matured by prescription within the meaning of the act it cannot be denied that the defendant after having executed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohammad Bakhsh Vs. Bohra Ram Prasad and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-08-1937
Reported in : AIR1937All581
the mahal but executed a deed of waqf alalaulad under act 6 of 1913 appointing himself mutawalli in his life time
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPazhangotte Unnikanna Menon Vs. Karimkulangara tarward Karnavan, Laksh ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-15-1937
Reported in : (1937)2MLJ358
the powers of the board under section 18 of the act as amended in 1930 were considered the board has no competent under the general law to deal with it that section only invalidates alienations of the kind specified therein by competent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHriday Nath Roy and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-28-1937
Reported in : AIR1937Cal520
the magistrate and the evidence appears to show that the acts were mostly committed on sunday when their shops in calcutta initiated the orders are liable to be set aside under section 107 2 it is laid down that proceedings should not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHossaini Methor Vs. Emperor
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-05-1937
Reported in : AIR1937Cal460
is not shown that she left by reason of any act or assistance proceeding from the accused 2 the evidence does whether there was any taking within the meaning of this section we have gone through the whole of the evidence and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPazhangette Unnikanna Menon Vs. Karimkulangara tarwad karnavan Lakshmi ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-15-1937
Reported in : AIR1937Mad842
as in this case in matters of internal management the act does not authorize the board to ignore the existenee of cannot therefore be upheld under the general law nor does section 76 madras hindu religious endowments act empower the endowments board
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT