Payment Of Wages Act 1936 Section 24 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: payment of wages act 1936 section 24 Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 574 results (1.814 seconds)Spencer Group Aerated Water Factory Employees' Union and anr. Vs. the ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-19-1996
Reported in : (1997)ILLJ362Mad
..... wages act 1936 claiming payment of wages for their service rendered with the third respondent however they allowed the said application to be dismissed for default on july 24 1992 one other proceeding which has ..... clearly shows that ineffect the second respondent company took over the aerated water section and the bakery section all the workers in the aerated water factory came to be absorbed in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. N.S.M. Sankarapandian
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-24-1996
Reported in : (1997)142CTR(Mad)62; [1996]222ITR289(Mad)
strict law between a firm and one of its partners payment of salary to a partner represents a special share of is entitled to standard deduction under section 16 of the act 5 a similar question came up for consideration before a cit 1970 77itr494 mad wherein while considering the provisions of sections 2 6b 10 4 b and 16 1 b of act 1992 and the indian income tax rules 1922 rule 24 this court held that the salary received by a partner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. N. Balakrishna
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-11-1996
Reported in : (1998)148CTR(AP)273; [1997]223ITR751(AP)
section 3 1 read with section 3 3 of the act on them it is competent for the government to declare certain things then anything not mentioned is excluded would apply section 7 v v s rao n v ramana p s
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.K.S. Murthy Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-30-1996
Reported in : ILR1996KAR3259; 1996(6)KarLJ187
of interest at 5 1 2 arises only when the payment of compensation is deferred and paid in the form of came to the conclusion that under section 51 of the act the landowner is entitled to for interest permissible under section person under section 47 shall subject to the provisions of section 50 a be paid in cash in a lumpsum if
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pandari Laxmaiah
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-07-1996
Reported in : [1997]223ITR671(AP)
read with sections 45 and 47 of the income tax act thus the tribunal is right in coming to the conclusion is levied it would be justified expressum facit cessare tacitum sections 4 3 v v s rao n v ramana p
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Anwar Begum
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-07-1996
Reported in : (1998)150CTR(AP)666; [1998]232ITR818(AP)
the beneficiary under section 21 12 of the wealth tax act case law analysis cwt v trustees of h e h e so as to be included for direct assessment under section 21 2 of the wealth tax act 1957 in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam's Wedding ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-07-1996
Reported in : (1998)150CTR(AP)159; [1998]232ITR861(AP)
of livestock as defined in section 2 xv of the act whatever products are declared as such by the government by jj declaration of notified area held it is only under section 3 that government are required to publish draft notification inviting
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.A. Quddus Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-24-1996
Reported in : [1997]227ITR665(AP)
hyderabad under sections 276c and 277 of the income tax act the petitioner is an assessee and c c no 7 were initiated and penalty was also imposed an application under section 273a of the income tax act 1961 for waiver of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiv Kumar Verma Vs. Chaman Lal
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-09-1996
Reported in : (1996)113PLR197
the respondent did not respond nor did he make the payment and that shows that no reply was sent by the made by a family after section 7 was inserted in act of 1920 by the punjab amendment act of 1973 right of alienation over property inherited by them however it noticed section 30 and observed that it only deals with power of reply was filed till 24 11 1995 as directed on 24 11 95 none was present on behalf of the respondent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuspal Singh Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-25-1996
Reported in : (1996)113PLR420
imply though it does not say so expressly the succession act to this extent does not affect the rights of the 1920 hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 sections 6 30 vijender jain c j m m kumar jasbir
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT