Payment Of Wages Act 1936 Section 24 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: payment of wages act 1936 section 24 Court: karnataka Year: 1949 Page 1 of about 12 results (1.986 seconds)M.L. Ramchandrasetty and ors. Vs. M.L. Nagappasetty and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-27-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant23; AIR1950Mys23
defendants since these may raise the propriety of defendants own acts in any even for shortening litigation and avoiding the possibility revision within the framework of order 1 rule 10 and section 115 of the civil procedure code 1908 adverse possession k moti ram motha ram v lalchand gulabchand a i r 24 1937 nag 121 i l r 1937 nag 366 is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPuttamma Vs. Chikka Hanumiah and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-31-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant18; AIR1950Mys18
case discussed the applicability of article 181 of the limitation act 1908 with regard to execution proceedings the proceedings remained pending 34 on 23rd november 1984 is clearly barred both under section 48 civil p as well as under art 802 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRukn-ul-mulk Syed Abdul Wajid and ors. Vs. R. Visvanathan and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-10-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant55; AIR1950Mys55
of the workmen the industry is liable to pay the wages of the lockout period and the closure compensation to the the provisions contained under sections 32a to 32g of the act would have come into operation state financial corporations act 1951 the manner prescribed in section 98 civil p c or section 429 criminal p c as the case may be or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMartha Samadhanam David Vs. Sudha
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-11-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant26; AIR1950Mys26
lapse of 12 years hel d article 110 of limitation act provides for a period of limitation of 12 years for does not dissolve a hindu marriage and the conviction under section 494 penal code of a hindu wife marrying after conversion code is based on the law of england according to 24 and 25 vict order 100 s 57 whoever being married
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Mysore Vs. Imperial Tobacco Co. of India L ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-26-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant1; [1956]26CompCas121(Kar)
found excessive the customers could return the same and receive payment from the company the company had employed a special staff and not exhaustive what other categories of work occupation or activity can be regarded as business for the purpose of the indirectly through or from any business connection in mysore under sections 4 ad 42 1 mysore income tax act section 4 of income tax burma v vasalakshi achi a i r 24 1937 rang 258 at p 261 1937 rang l r
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDoddamadiah and ors. Vs. Mallappa
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-08-1949
Reported in : AIR1953Kant6; AIR1953Mys6
2 1944 and exhibit e 1 isthe consideration receipt for payment of rs 400 executed by the defendants on the sameday oral agreement to rescind it can be proved indian evidence act section 92 proviso 4 these observations may be applied to of the appellant which is a device to avoid tax section 92 of the evidence act forbids evidence such as exhibit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdinaranappa Vs. Mallamma
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-18-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant13; AIR1950Mys13
on the promissory note dated 7th september 1940 for the payment made towards interest the defendant is admittedly an agriculturist the period of limitation different from that prescribed in the limitation act but in a subsequent decision in kishore lal stores v by the limitation act can it be said that this section of the agriculturists relief act prescribes for any suit any limitation act but the period of limitation substituted in section 24 mysore agriculturists relief act for three years prescribed in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarasimha Setty Vs. Chennamma and anr.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-13-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant8; AIR1950Mys8
3 k l manjunath b v nagarathna jj disallowance of payment of commission to agents held though a tax payer may was filed under section 25 of the guardians and wards act 1890 the child was handed over while infant due to an application by father for custody that was filed under section 25 of the guardians and wards act 1890 the child
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRukn-ul-mulk Syed Abdul Wajid and ors. Vs. R. Vishwanathan and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-29-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant33; AIR1950Mys33
the property of the former it further debated whether such payment was a gift under section 122 of the transfer of rights must be established and will not be inferred form acts which may have been done merely from kindness or affection business the court ruled that in view of provisions of sections 101 and 103 of the evidence act 1872 the plaintiff rs 2 500 to ramalingam and his son plaintiff 1 24 as observed in appalaswami v suryanarayana murti a i r
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubbegowda and ors. Vs. H.L. Keshava Murthy and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-15-1949
Reported in : AIR1950Kant6; AIR1950Mys6
a proprietor in good faith pending litigation makes the necessary payments for the preservation of the estate in dispute and the was not only a declared owner but was also in actual possession of the property 4 it is contended by the which venkamma apparently possessed at the time the scope of sections 69 and 70 contract act is very well brought out
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT