Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R ON THE11H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.883 OF2013... APPELLANTBETWEEN : STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MAHADEVAPURA POLICE STATION BENGALURU. (BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER) AND: SRI. B.Y. VENKATESH @ MUTHURAJU SON OF YELLAPPA AGED33YEARS RESIDENT OF RENTED ROOM OF RAMANJINI NAGONDANAHALLI ROAD IMMADIHALLI BENGALURU-560 066. (BY SRI J.T. GIREESHA, ADVOCATE)... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION378(1) AND (3) OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING TO GRANT LEAVE TO APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ACQUITTAL DATED2103.2013 PASSED2BY THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN SESSIONS CASE No.724 OF2007ACQUTTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS392 302 READ WITH SECTION34AND201READ WITH SECTION34OF INDIAN PENAL CODE. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERV...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1999KAR1961; 1999(5)KarLJ1
Y. Bhaskar Rao, C.J. 1. The Medical Council of India (hereinafter, for short, 'MCI') has filed this appeal assailing the judgment of the learned Single Judge disposing of the writ petition filed by respondent 1-college with certain directions.2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent 1-college was started in the year 1963-64. In the year 1985-86 the college had increased the seats up to 130 and the same was approved by the MCI. Thereafterwards, up to 1-6-1992 the seats in the college were increased from 130 to 175 and 175 to 195. The college had applied for approval of the said 195 seats to the MCI. An inspection was made on behalf of the MCI regarding the infrastructure of the college and they had suggested for remedying the defects pointed out by them, by upgrading the standards according to the norms provided by the MCI. Thereafter, further inspections were made and the Inspectors of the MCI inspected the college and gave the report, stating that the college has got all the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Writ Petition No.18992/2003 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order passed by the Respondent Bank dated 03.10.2001 vide Annexure-L, dated 26.12.2002 vide Annexure-Y and dated 28-03-2003 vide Annexure-A and etc., Writ Petition No.40590/2003 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order by the Respondent/Bank dated 16.07.2003 vide Annexure-C and etc., Writ Petition No.30035/2004 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash vide Annexure-Y dated 01.07.2004 passed by the Respondent and etc., Writ Petition No.10563/2005 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash order dated 14.12.04 vide Annexure-V passed by the Bank and etc.,) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to direct the respondent to disburse the pensionary benefits of this petition as per Annexure-B, forthwith and etc., These petitions are heard and disposed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY R-4 DT.25-3-2003 VIDE ANN. Q.) NAGARATHNA J. 1. In this writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 25.03.2003 passed in M.A.No.55/2003 (Annexure-Q) by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘DRAT’ for the sake of convenience). By the said order DRAT directed the respondent-Bank to receive the balance amount of Rs.63.00 lakh and release the title deeds related to the scheduled property to the 3rd respondent-institution which was to discharge the entire amount due to the Bank. The 3rd respondent-institution was directed to deposit before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (hereinafter, referred to as "DRT"), at Bangalore, a sum of Rs.20.00 lakh due to the borrower within two weeks from the date of the impugned order with a further direction to the Presiding Officer DRT to return the said amount to the borrower i.e., the p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.DESAI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1140 OF2016CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1677 OF2016CRL.A.No.1140 OF2016 BETWEEN: Sri. Mallikarjuna S/o Shankarappa Aged about 66 years R/o Hayikal Chitradurga District. ...Appellant (By Sri. H.N. Shashidhara Sr. Counsel for Smt. B.A. Sujatha - Advocate) AND:1. Sri. Vasantha @ Vasanthakumar M.P. S/o. Parameshwarappa Aged about 34 years 2. Sri. Parameshwarappa S/o. Siddappa Aged about 68 years 2 3. Smt. Girijamma W/o. Parameshwarappa Aged about 61 years All are residing at Kubaturu Village Soraab Taluk Shivamogga District 571112.4. State by Anavatti Police Station Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka Bangalore 560 001. ...Respondents (By Sri.Umesh P.B Advocate for Sri. R.B. Deshpande Advocate for R-2 and R-3; Smt. K.P. Yashodha HCGP for R-4; Vide court order dated 06.01.2022 and 24....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
M.F.A.No.11378/2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE02D DAY OF DECEMBER2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.11378/2012 (MV) R THE MANAGER M/S. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. I FLOOR, MAYUR COMPLEX NEXT TO PIA BHAVAN, PEENYA BANGALORE 560 058 BETWEEN: CHELUVARAJU S/O DASAPPA AGED ABOUT23YEARS R/O MENASAKERE DODDI KENCHANABALLY POST H.DURGA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT (BY SRI SHRIPAD V.SHASTRI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2.3. (BY SRI C.R.RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; NOTICE TO R-2 IS DISPENSED WITH; R-3 SERVED) C.V.DAVIS S/O K.T.THOMAS KALLARACKAL STORE CHOKKASANDRA, DASARAHALLI BANGALORE 560 057 M.SANJAY S/O MUNISWAMY, NO.11 NEAR RAGHAVENDRA SCHOOL VINAYAKANAGAR KAMAKSHIPALYA BANGALORE 560 079 APPELLANT RESPONDENTS M.F.A.No.11378/2012 2 THIS MFA FILED U/S1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED0709.2010 PASSED IN MVC NO.3544/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & MACT, BANGALORE, PARTLY A...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1993]202ITR303(KAR); [1993]202ITR303(Karn)
K. Shivashankar Bhat, J. 1. The question referred to us under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, reads thus : ' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to depreciation at ten per cent. on the nursing home building on the ground that it is a ' plant ' ?' 2. The assessee is an individual and is a medical practitioner. He is running a nursing home in respect of which he claimed depreciation allowance at ten per cent. for the assessment year 1983-84. The building was constructed during 1979-80. For the earlier year, depreciation was allowed at five per cent. treating it as a second class building. For the year 1983-84, the assessee put forth the claim that either it is a factory building or a plant entitling him to depreciation at ten per cent. 3. The Income-tax Officer did not accept the assessee's case that the life of the building was reduced by the heat generated in the canteen and sterilisation room ; according to the Income-tax Of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
(Prayer: This appeal is filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act 1984, against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.11.2015, passed in Matrimonial Case No. 7/2015 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, at Ballary, dismissing the petition filed under Section 13(1) (ia) and 1(iii) of Hindu Marriage Act.) Rathnakala, J. 1. In this appeal, the appellant/husband is assailing the judgment of the Family Court dated 30.11.2015, whereby his divorce petition filed under Section 13(1)(ia) and Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, (for short, the Act ), came to be dismissed. 2. Briefly stated, the appellant/husband filed a divorce petition with the facts that the parties were married on 05.05.2011 as per their custom. The respondent/wife joined him in the matrimonial home three months after the marriage; 1 months thereof, her abnormal behaviour was noticed, she used to walk out of the bed during night hours, spread her hairs, smile, hit her head on the wall and was found s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE07H DAY OF OCTOBER2015PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR ITA No.766 OF2009c/w ITA Nos.769/2009, 1046/2008, 765/2009 & 767/2009 IN ITA No.766/2009 C/w ITA Nos.769/2009, 765/2009 & 767/2009 AS COMMON APPEALS: BETWEEN:1. The Commissioner of Income-tax, C.R.Building, Queens Road, Bangalore 2. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-11(1), C.R.Building, Queens Road, Bangalore Appellants (By Sri.K.V.Aravind, adv A/w Sri. G.Kamaladhar, adv.,) AND: M/s. AMCO Power Systems Ltd., (now known as M/s. AMCO Soft India Ltd.,) Hebbal-Bellary-Jakkur Road, Byatarayanapura, Bangalore 560 092. (By Sri. A.Shankar & M.Lava, advs.,) Respondent 2 Year 2001-02 These ITAs are filed U/S260A of IT Act, 1961 arising out of order dated:10. 07.2009 passed in ITA No.172/BNG/2009, for the Assessment ITA No.170/BNG/2009, for the Assessment Year 1999-2000 in ITA No.769/2009; ITA No.173/BANG/2009, for the Assessment Year 2002-0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE5H DAY OF JANUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.318/2012 ... PETITIONER BETWEEN: MR M RATHNAVARMA PADIVAL S/O LATE M N PADIVAL AGED ABOUT80YEARS MEHAR BUNGLOW, BALMATTA MANGALORE-575 001. (BY SRI.K CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. MRS. M SHARADA R HEGDE2 MRS. M. SRIDEVI A SHETTY AGED ABOUT42YEARS W/O DR. RAJESH HEGDE NMC HOSPITAL P.O BOX NO.6222, ABUDHABI U.A.E. W/O MR. ANIL PRASAD SHETTY VINAYA, 4163, 1ST FLOOR, 8TH CROSS A MAIN HAL2D STAGE BANGALORE. LOCAL ADDRESS OF R1 COSMOS LANE, KADRI TEMPLE ROAD MANGALORE. 2 AGED ABOUT39YEARS W/O MR. NISHIKANTH SEMITHA NO.3, BUGATTI COURT MILL PARK, VICTORIA AUSTRALIA-3082 NO.1 TO4ARE REPRSENTED BY THEIR GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. KUMAR CHIKKAPPA ALVA AGED ABOUT30YEARS S/O U.T. ALVA KAVIRAJ, KADRI KAMBLA, D.K-575 001.3. MRS. SHIBANI T SHETTY W/O TILAK DAS SHETTY NO.402, THRISANDYA APARTMENT DADA SAHEB PALKE ROAD DADAR EAST, MU...
Tag this Judgment!