Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-22-2007
Reported in : 2008(1)KarLJ635; 2007(4)KCCRSN313; 2007(6)AIRKarR69
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.W.P. No.14149/20061. Writ petitioners claim to have been working as Lecturers in the 3rd respondent -Karnataka Chitrakala Parishath, a society registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the orders of termination produced as Annexure- F, G and H dated 6.10.2006, 6.10.2006 and 29.9.2006 respectively issued by the Administrator of the society, who is running the educational institution, which read as under:ANNEXURE-EThe explanation submitted by you on 5th October 2006 is not satisfactory.Hence, your services at Chitrakala Parishath as Lecturer in the Department of Sculpture, College of Fine Arts, is terminated immediately with effect from 6th October, 2006.ANNEXURE - GThe Explanation submitted by you on 5th October 2006 is not satisfactory.Hence, your services at Chitrakala Parishath as Lecturer in the Department of Painting, College of Fine Arts, is terminated immediately with effect f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-05-2007
Reported in : ILR2008KAR1074; LC2008(1)373; ILR2008(1)Kar1075; 2008(1)KCCRSN82; 2008(2)AIRKarR517; AIR2008NOC1286; 2008AIHC2063(Kar)
V. Jagannathan, J.1. A flower is inseparable from its fragrance. Waves do not exist without the sea. There cannot be 'night' without the day. 'Creation' does not exclude its creator. 'YAKSHAGANA' cannot be thought of without the name of Dr. Kota Shivarama Karanth (for short 'Dr. Karanath').2. Dr. Karanth, who combined in himself the role of a Novelist, Play writer, Essayist, Encyclopediationst, Cultural anthropologist, Artist, writer of Science, Environmentalist, a Jnanapeeta Awards, all rolled in one personality, was born in the year 1902. He left his indelible impressions on the literary Map of Karnataka. He died in the year 1997. Three years before his deaths Dr. Karanth got his 'Will' registered on 18.6.1994 and bequeathed copyrights of his 'literary works' to Smt. Malini Malya (plaintiff).3. A news item published in 'Vijay Karnataka' News paper dated 19.9.2001 revealed that the Yakshagana Ballet directed by Dr. Karanth was perforated at New Delhi. This gave raise to the plaintiff ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-29-2007
Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ686; 2007(4)KCCRSN260; 2007(3)AIRKarR40.
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. In response to the order and direction dated 3-11-2006 passed/issued by this Court calling upon the learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for respondent No. 1 - Government of India to respond to the article capuoned 'Medicines out of commoners reach' published hi Deccan Herald, English News Daily dated 13-7-2006, Sri. Aravind Kumar, learned Assistant Solicitor General on instructions submits that the proposal for possible amendment to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1949 (for short the Act'] has not been carried out; that the Act has not been amended so far as was apprehended in the article; that, in fact, in the light of considerable resistance from the various departments of the Government, as indicated in the very article, the meeting itself had not taken place and therefore no decision of the Government was taken for the purpose of amending the Act on the lines indicated in the article.2. Sri. Muralidharan, learned Counsel for respondent No. 3 s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-09-2007
Reported in : ILR2008KAR257; (2008)13VST377(Karn); 2008(1)KCCR451; 2008(2)AIRKarR8; 2008LabIC1763
V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. These matters are listed before this Court pursuant to the order passed by the Supreme Court on 14.7,2006 in Civil Appeal No. 4476/00 and connected matters. The operative portion of the said order reads as under;-Since relevant data do not appear to have been placed before the High Courts, we permit the parties to place them in the concerned writ petitions within two months, The concerned High Courts shall deal with the basic issue as to whether the impugned levy was compensatory in nature. The High Courts are requested to decide the aforesaid issue within five months from the date of receipt of our order. The Judgment in the respective cases shall be placed on record by the concerned parties within a months from the date of the decision in each case pursuant to our direction.2. Ms. Vani, learned Counsel for the appellant filed a memo requesting this Court to treat the applications I.A.II/06, for production of additional documents, as having been filed in this app...
Tag this Judgment!