Court : Karnataka
-:1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA Writ Petition Nos.2642/2009 (GM-MM-S) c/w 44793/2013, 13595/2008, 13516/2008, 13654/2008, 13803/2008, 14157/2008, 14802/2008, 30927/2008, 30928/2008, 30995/2008, 31128/2008, 31129/2008, 31141/2008, 31142/2008, 31143/2008, 31144/2008, 31145/2008, 31146/2008, 31147/2008, 31148/2008, 31149/2008, 31152/2008, 31181/2008, 31183/2008, 31188/2008, 31189/2008, 31191/2008, 31227/2008, 31228/2008, 31229/2008, 31230/2008, 31234/2008, 31235/2008, 31266/2008, 31327/2008, 31439/2008, 31577/2008 (GM-MM-S), 368/2009 (GM-FOR), -:2. :- 863/2009, 6721/2009, 10712/2009, 16237/2009, 35251/2009 (GM-MM-S), 60230/2009 (GM-FOR), 15782/2010, 15795/2010, 15809/2010, 15825- 15826/2010, 15953/2010, 15954/2010, 15984/2010, 15985/2010, 15990/2010, 15991/2010, 16145/2010, 16144/2010, 16147/2010, 17000/2010, 17001/2010...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayers: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare the notification Ann-A the notification dt.27.8.08, is ultra vires the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the demand notice dtd.18.9.2013 vide Annex-A and the demand notice dtd.21.9.2013 vide Annex-A1, both issued by the R4, and all further proceedings thereto and etc., This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the notification dt. 16.8.2008 issued by the R1 and published in the Gazette on 27.8.2008 vide Annexure E and the memorandum/common order dt. 30.9.2008 issued by the R4 vide Annexure G and all further proceedings thereto, in so far as the petitioner is ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
ORDERAshok B. Hinchigeri, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the order, dated 18.6.2009 passed by the III Addl. District Judge, D.K., Mangalore in M.A. No. 9/2008 and the order, dated 14.9.2007 passed by the I Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Mangalore on I.A. Nos. 6 and 7 in O.S. No. 40/1996.2. The facts of the case in brief are that the petitioners filed the suit for partition, separate possession, etc. During the pendency of the suit, the defendant No. 1, Shantharama Pergade died on 10.5.2000. The petitioners filed two I.As. - I.A. No. 6 for substituting the legal representatives of the deceased defendant No. 1 and I.A. No. 7 for setting aside the abatement. The said I.A.s were rejected by the Trial Court, by its common order, dated 14.9.2007.3. Feeling aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred M.A. No. 9/2008. The learned Appellate Judge dismissed the said appeal by confirming the orders of the Trial Court. On suffering the concurrent orders, this petition is presented.4. Sri S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24h DAY OF APRIL, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.7004/2014 (T-IT) BETWEEN: M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: PLOT NO.25, 5TH CROSS, J.P. SOFTWARE PARK ELECTRONIC CITY, PHASE-1, HOSUR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 100 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. SANJAY NAYAK S/O SRI. SHANKAR NAYAK AGED ABOUT49YEARS. (BY SRI N VENKATARAMAN, Sr.COUNSEL A/W SRI K.R.VASUDEVAN & SRI. HARISH ADVOCATES) AND: ... PETITIONER1 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE124), BENGALURU RASHTROTHANA PARISHAD BHAVAN (4TH FLOOR) NO.14/3A, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL, BENGALURU, 2 RASHTROTHANA PARISHAD BHAVAN (6TH FLOOR) NO.14/3A, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. ..RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, SR.PANEL COUNSEL) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR2003Kant357; I(2004)DMC118; ILR2003KAR1852; 2003(3)KarLJ247
D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act is by the husband who had preferred M.C. No. 126 of 1996 before the Court of II Additional Civil Judge at Mysore praying for a decree of divorce in his favour as against the respondent-wife and for dissolution of their marriage which had been solemnised on 26-5-1991 on the ground of cruelty on the part of the wife and also on the ground that the respondent-wife is a person suffering from schizophrenia and the mental disorder which she suffers intermittently was of such kind and to such an extent that the petitioner cannot be reasonably expected to live with the respondent. 2. The Trial Court which looked into the petition having not agreed with the petitioner and having declined to grant the relief, the husband is in appeal before us. 3. Brief facts leading to the petition and the appeal are that the parties who follow Hindu customs and rituals became husband and wife as per the marriage performed in acco...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF JULY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE COMMERCIAL APPEAL No.56 OF2024IN COM.A.A3OF2024BETWEEN: M/S KLR GROUP ENTERPRISES NO.306, 3RD FLOOR, EMBASSY CHAMBERS, NO.5, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, MR.P. LAVAKUMAR. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI DHANANJAY JOSHI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI SHASHIDHAR R, ADVOCATE) AND:1. MADHU H V, S/O LATE MR H N VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT27YEARS, 2. MR. MANOHAR V, S/O LATE MR H N VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, 3. MRS. C T BHAGYAMMA W/O LATE MR H N VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT54YEARS, 2 4. MRS. ANITHA W/O LATE MR N SHANKARAPPA @ H N SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT45YEARS, 5. MRS. NIRANJAN GOWDA S, S/O LATE MR N SHANKARAPPA @ H N SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT24YEARS, ALL DEFENDANTS RESIDING AT HEGGONDAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA-560087. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRASHANTH G, ADVOCATE FOR R1, S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA RSA NO.6159/2012 (DECLN. & POSSN) BETWEEN1 RANGAPPA S/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:38. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.2. GOPAL S/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:36. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.3. BADIVAPPA S/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:24. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.4. DEVENDRAPPA S/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:21. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.5. SUJATHA D/O HULAGAPPA LAMANI, AGE:19. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. :2. : PINCODE:583. 101.6. YAMANAWWA W/O TUKKAPPA LAMANI, AGE:45. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE:583. 101.7. RATNAWWA W/O MURALI RATHOD, AGE:24. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GINEGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL. PINCODE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: Crl.P. filed U/S. 439 Cr.P.C praying that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 602/15 of K.R.Puram Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Secs. 376, 506, I.P.C. and Section 14, Foreigners Act.) 1. The present bail application is filed under Section 439, Cr.P.C. by the sole accused of a criminal case in Crime No. 602/15 registered by K.R. Puram police station, Bengaluru, on 1.10.2015. 2. Initially the case was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506, I.P.C. After concluding investigation, charge sheet is filed for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506, I.P.C. and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. 3. Learned SPP representing the State has vehemently opposed bail on the ground that prima facie case is forthcoming in regard to the criminal intimidation of the first informant, a lady by name Ms. Sai kumara by this petitioner and committing rape on her. It is argued th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1990KAR2195
ORDERRajasekhara Murthy, J. 1. The first Writ Petition (W.P.No. 10966/89), is filed by the Karnataka State Cine Junior Artists' Association, represented by its President and the second petition (W.P.No. 12233/89) is filed by the two-persons, the first of whom is a Professor of Kannada and the second is a Reader in Kannada, Vijaya College. They claimed to be interested in the advancement of Kannada -language and the interests of Kannadigas, inter alia, the promotion and encouragement of Kannada-films and the Kannada film industry in the Karnataka State.2. Both the petitions are filed as public interest litigation and have challenged the Government Order dated 13th June 1989 granting 50% entertainment-tax under Sections 3C(i)(a) and 4A(i) of the Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958 (the Act) to the Kannada Feature Film - 'SHARAVEGADA SARADARA'.3. The State of Karnataka, the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and the Director of Information and Publicity are respondents-1 to 3 to the Writ ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
-:1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY WRIT APPEAL No.538/2020 (GM-RES) Connected with WRIT APPEAL No.545/2020 (GM-RES) IN W.A.No.538/2020 BETWEEN:1. SRI U.M. RAMESH RAO S/O. LATE U.M. KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT77YEARS, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT, I G ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALUR 577 101.2. M/S. VIJAYADEVAN COFFEE ESTATE A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING OFFICE AT I G ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALUR 577 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI U.M. RAMESH RAO.3. M/S. YELLIKUDIGE ESTATE A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING OFFICE AT YELLIKUDIGE VILLAGE ALDUR HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALUR TALUK 577 111 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI U.M. RAMESH RAO. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S.S. NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVAS S.V., ADVOCATE) -:2. :- AND: UNION BANK OF INDIA (FORMERLY CORPORATION BANK) M.G. ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALUR 577 101 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINN...
Tag this Judgment!