Court : Karnataka
1/26 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HONBLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION No.49577/2014 (T-RES) BETWEEN M/s Bella Premier Happy Hygiene Care Private Limited, # 319/1, A Block, Ground Floor, Hosur Main Road, Bengaluru-560 068. Represented by Managing Director & Daniel Norbert Babalski, Director. ...Petitioner (By Mr. Shivadass G., Advocate) AND1 State of Karnataka, Through its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Vidhana Soudha, Bengaluru-560 001.2. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in Karnataka, Vanijya Therige Karyalaya, Gandhinagar, Bengaluru-560 009. (By Mr. T.K. Vedamurthy, AGA) ...Respondents Date of order :23. 10.2017 WP No.49577/2014 M/s Bella Premier Happy Hygiene Care Private Limited Vs, State of Karnataka & another. . 2/26 This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to hold that Sec.3(ii) & 3(iii) of the Karnataka Act No.54/13, amending Sub-Clause (7) &...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1986Kant119
ORDER1. In this batch of Writ Petitions, in which the petitioners, who are the managements as also individuals, who are members of the management of various private engineering colleges in the State, have questioned the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1984 ('the Act' for short) and orders issued thereunder, the following main question arises forconsideration :Where the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizens under Arts. 19(1)(c), 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution includes the right to establish and administer the Educational Institutions of their choice? and if.so, whether the Act which prohibits the collection of Capitation Fee for admission to Education Institutions except to the extent permitted by an order made under the proviso to S. 3 of the Act is violative all or any of those Articles and, Arts. 14, 31A and 300A of the Constitution?Facts of the Case :Originally the Writ Petitions were presented quest...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573
ORDERR.P. Sethi, C.J.1. Despite half a century of independence, overthrow of the foreign rule, abolition of monarchial system of Governments and the sea changes brought about in the socio-economic-political system in the Democratic Republic of India, the successors-in-interest of the former ruler of Mysore State have challenged the jurisdiction of the Legislature in enacting laws with the purpose of depriving them of the privileges allegedly conferred upon the ruler in lieu of the surrender of sovereignty in favour of the Dominion of India. Claim to the properties has been sought to be protected under the umbrella stated to have been provided by the Instrument of Accession and Articles 294 and 295 of the Constitution of India. The action of the State Legislature in enacting the laws with respect to the properties of the former ruler of Mysore has also been challenged on the grounds of inherent lack of jurisdiction under Part XI read with Schedule 7 of the Constitution of India. In orde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1992KAR3068; 1992(3)KarLJ355
ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J. 1. In these Petitions, the petitioners seek quashing of the building licence and the sanctioned plan issued to the fourth respondent by the first respondent - Planning Authority and the second respondent -City Corporation. There is also a prayer for a direction to enforce the Zonal Regulations issued under the Outline Development Plan (ODP) and Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP). The further prayer seeks the demolition of the offending structure put up by the fourth respondent. The petitioners also have filed I.As.II and III, I.A.II for the amendment of the Writ Petition and to treat I.A.III as additional statement. Petitioners are permitted to seek this additional prayer and these I.As.II and III are read part of these Writ Petitions. The result is that the petitioners seek the quashing of two Government Orders, one dated 8th November 1984 and another dated 17th October 1985. As per the earlier order dated 8.11.84 Government accorded approval for relaxatio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR2004Kant390; ILR2004KAR3140
ORDERS. Abdul Nazeer, J.1. The petitioner claims to be a member of the Karnataka Rural Homeopathic Medical Practitioners' Association, Gokak, practicing Homeopathic system of Medicine at Hole Alur. According to him, he has vast experience in Homeopathic system of medicine and that he has been taking special care for the poor patients satisfying all their medical needs. It is his further case that the Homeopathic Medical Practitioners in Karnataka and Karnataka Rural Homeopathic Medical Practitioners' Association, Gokak, have been urging the Government of Karnataka to open Registration for the benefit of the un-registered Homeopathic Medical Practitioners, to get themselves registered in accordance with the provisions of the Homoeopathic Medical Practitioners' Act. Though several representations were filed, the State has not heeded to their request. The Registrar of Karnataka Ayurvedic & Unani Practitioners Board, issued a notice as per Annexure-D calling upon the petitioner to appear b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 Reserved on :30. 07.2024 R Pronounced on :09. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE09H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.3002 OF2024BETWEEN:1. . DR. SMT. SUBHALAKSHMI N., W/O MANIYAN NARAYANAN AGED ABOUT39YEARS RESIDING AT NO.22 KHATA No.862, 2ND CROSS ABBAIAH REDDY LAYOUT PROPRIETOR MEDIZONE MEDICAL CENTRE KAGGADASAPURA BENGALURU - 560 093. 2 . DR. MOSCOW MANI SA S/O SOMASUNDARAM S., AGED ABOUT46YEARS RESIDING AT No.77, 4TH MAIN ROAD VIVEKANAGAR FURTHER EXTENSION BENGALURU - 560 047. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI PRAVEEN S., ADVOCATE) 2 AND:1. . STATE BY DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY (DAA) PC AND PNDT DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICE BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU 560 001. 2 . DR. RAVINDRANATH M.METI AGED ABOUT50YEARS DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESH, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRIMINAL P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.136 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.171 OF2022IN COMAP NO.136/2022 BETWEEN: NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.379 ROAD NO.10, JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD-500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR A S R MURTHY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA AND SRI. C K NANDA KUMAR SR. COUNSELS FOR SRI. HIDAYATHULLA M H - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . SRI L V SREERANGARAJU NO.537, JESHTA 3RD MAIN HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085. 2 3 . SRI R RAJAMANI FLAT NO.3, RAMPRIYA AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNANAGAR CHENNAI-600040. 4 . SRI T D MANAMOHAN NO.10, KAVERY THARALABALU ENCLAVE NEAR YELAHANKA OLD TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [2008(119)FLR1128]; 2008(6)KarLJ344; (2009)ILLJ661Kant; 2008(5)AIRKarR437
ORDERSubhash B. Adi, J.1. An award dated 29th March, 2006 in Reference No. 122 of 1998 is called in question.2. Seven workmen sought for reference of a dispute on the ground that, they were illegally dismissed from service. An enquiry was held against 7 workmen inter alia, on the charge that they had gone on illegal and unjustified strike on 16-10-1995 without giving any notice and had obstructed the loyal employees, patients and their at tenders to get into the hospital and had threatened the employees with dire consequence and because of the strike and threats, the work of the hospital suffered considerably and the patients were put to lot of hardship.3. On the basis of the evidence led by parties, the Enquiry Officer submitted a detailed report, holding that the charges alleged against the 7 workmen are proved. The Disciplinary Authority considering the findings and also the explanation, passed an order of dismissal, against which a reference sought.4. Before the Reference Court, th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.136 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.171 OF2022IN COMAP NO.136/2022 BETWEEN: NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.379 ROAD NO.10, JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD-500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR A S R MURTHY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA AND SRI. C K NANDA KUMAR SR. COUNSELS FOR SRI. HIDAYATHULLA M H - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . SRI L V SREERANGARAJU NO.537, JESHTA 3RD MAIN HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085. 2 3 . SRI R RAJAMANI FLAT NO.3, RAMPRIYA AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNANAGAR CHENNAI-600040. 4 . SRI T D MANAMOHAN NO.10, KAVERY THARALABALU ENCLAVE NEAR YELAHANKA OLD TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2012(4)CTC(IP)8; 2012(3)KCCR140(SN)
(Prayer: This O.S. filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC before the City Civil & Sessions Court, Bangalore District, Bangalore, registered as Original Suit No.7801/2003 and transferred to the High Court of Karnataka, praying to the pass a judgment and decree against the defendants as under: a) for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and/or their licensee, nominees, agents, suppliers, dealers, consignees or any one acting directing or indirectly on their behalf from manufacturing and/or producing and/or selling of the products LIVOLIV-250 by infringing the plaintiffs protected patent rights under patent No.186857 of 20th April 1998 granted A method of preparing a Herbal Hepatoprotective and Anthiepatotoxic Composition in the market throughout India and etc.)1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, producing or selling of the product Livoliv-250 by infringing the plaintiffs protected Patent rights u...
Tag this Judgment!