Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash/set aside the order dated 27.10.2012 passed by Respondent no.1, in striking of the name of the petitioner from the Indian Medical Register Annexure-A as well as from the Register of State Medical Council for a period of one year and etc.) 1. The facts of the case are as follows: 2. The petitioner is a Medical Practitioner and is a Consultant in Surgical Gastroenterology and Laparoscopic Surgery. He is also said to be a Multi-organ Transplant Surgeon and was working as a consultant with M/s Fortis Hospital, Bangalore. The petitioner is said to be conferred with innumerable honours both in India and abroad, over the years in recognition of his expertise and advanced knowledge in the field of organ transplantation. During the year 2010, Smt. Seema Rai, the wife of the third respondent was said to have been diagnosed with severe diabetes and end-stage renal failure, was undergoing ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-06-2014
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the proceedings dated 10.11.2013 vide Annexure-A issued by R-2 and notification dated 23.11.2013 vide Annexure-A1 of the R-2 and etc. This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records and quashing Government notification dated 23.11.2013 vide Annexure-G. These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the notification dated 23.11.2013 passed by the R2 vide Annexure-A and the R2 Board proceedings/meeting dated 10.11.2013 vide Annexure-B fixing the price for sugarcane and hereby seeking direction to direct the R2 to fix the price of the sugarcane afresh considering the recovery of sugar from sugarcane and income from the by products of the sugarcane received by the R3. This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India prayi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
(Prayer: These W.Ps. Are Filed Praying To Quash The Order Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench Vide Order Dt: 06.03.2014 Vide Annx-G. Direct The R1 Not To Initiate Recovery Proceedngs Or Any Other Coercive Steps Pursuant Notice Dt: 28.01.2013 Vide: Annx-B Or Proceedings Pending Disposal Of The Appeals Before The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal On Merits Etc.,) (Prayer: These W.Ps. Are Filed Praying To Quash The Order Dtd: 06.03.2014 Passed Y The Income -Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench-B, Bangalore Vide Annex-F. Etc.,) 1. Petitioner, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and a subsidiary of M/s Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, engaged in the business of providing telecom services to its subscribers in India, has Drought in question the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, (hereinafter referred to as ITAT, for brevity) dated 6.3.2014 (vide Annexure-G) or. two interlocutory applications filed by it in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
(Prayer: These W.Ps. Are Filed Praying To Quash The Order Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench Vide Order Dt: 06.03.2014 Vide Annx-G. Direct The R1 Not To Initiate Recovery Proceedngs Or Any Other Coercive Steps Pursuant Notice Dt: 28.01.2013 Vide: Annx-B Or Proceedings Pending Disposal Of The Appeals Before The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal On Merits Etc.,) (Prayer: These W.Ps. Are Filed Praying To Quash The Order Dtd: 06.03.2014 Passed Y The Income -Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench-B, Bangalore Vide Annex-F. Etc.,) 1. Petitioner, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and a subsidiary of M/s Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, engaged in the business of providing telecom services to its subscribers in India, has Drought in question the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, (hereinafter referred to as ITAT, for brevity) dated 6.3.2014 (vide Annexure-G) or. two interlocutory applications filed by it in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-11-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals Are Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition 47552- 553/12 Dated 2/7/13.) Cav Judgment 1. These writ appeals arise out of the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.47552-47553/2012. Factual Background: 2. Appellant herein had filed two sets of writ petitions namely, W.P.Mos.47552-47553/2012 and W.P.Nos.268- 270/2013 in respect of land bearing Sy.Nos.18 and 19 (BBMP New No.234/19/3D) Kumudanapalya, Konankunte Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, admeasuring about ll,507sq.mtrs. (hereinafter referred to as "scheduled land" for the sake of convenience). By a common order, those writ petitions were disposed of. 3. In W.P.Nos.47552-553/2012 approval granted by the third respondent-State Level Single Window Clearance Committee ('SLSWCC for short) vide communication dated 12/09/2012 (Annexure "M") and consequently, communication dated 17/09/2012 (Annexure "N")...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-03-2014
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ declaring that S.53-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure is unconstitutional and ultra vires the Constitution of India; quash the impugned notice dated 18.10.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent produced as Annexure-'S'.) 1. The constitutional validity of S.53-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the 'Code'), is in issue, in this writ petition. That apart, there is challenge to a police notice dated 18.10.2014, as at Annexure-'S', whereby, the second respondent called upon the petitioner to appear at 9.00 a.m., on 21.10.2014, in empty stomach, for medical examination at Victoria Hospital, Bengaluru. 2. Section 53-A of the Code, which was inserted by Act No.25 of 2005, with effect from 23.06.2006, reads as under: "S.53A. Examination of person accused of rape by medical practitioner.- (1) When a person is arrested on a charge of committing an offence of rape or an ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
(These petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the 2nd respondent to direct 3rd respondent not to act upon and to quash the notice dated 13.1.2014 vide Annexures-E and El respectively. These petitions having been reserved, this day, the Court pronounced the following:) 1. Shortly stated, the facts of the case are that, the petitioners are tite Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Makali Grama Panchayat (for short 'the Panchayat'). Respondents 5 to 11, the members of the Panchayat, having presented a Motion of No-Confidence on 02.01.2014, the 3rd respondent has given notice dated 13.01.2014 in Form-II under Rule 3(2) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat) Rules, 1994 (for short 'the Rules'), fixing the meeting of the Panchayat on 29.01.2014 at 12.00 noon at the Panchayat Office. Petitioners having received the notice of the said meeting, filed these writ petitions on 24....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-23-2014
- :1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P.No.22801/2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN: Dr.SMT.MANGALA SHRIDHAR, AGED ABOUT40YRS, W/O.SHRIDHAR NARAYANIH, R/A.NO.1914, 18TH A MAIN, SHRI LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, 5TH CROSS, II STAGE, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 078. .. PETITIONER (By Sri K.V.DHANANJAYA, ADV. & SRI I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, ADV.) AND: THE KARNATAKA GOVERNORS SECRETARIAT OFFICE, REP.BY ITS UNDER-SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNOR (ADMN.) RAJ BHAVAN, BANGALORE 560 001. (DELETED V.C.O. DT.7/7/2014) 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001. 2.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIDHANA SOUDHA POLICE STATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001. .. RESPONDENTS (BY PROF.RAVIVARMA KUMAR, ADVOCATE GENERAL & SRI A.S.PONNANNA, A.A.G., FOR SRI S.V.GIRI KUMAR, AGA FOR R-1 &2) - :2. :- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-23-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Declare That The Suspension Order At Ann-B Dated 14/5/2014 Is Ultra Vires The Powers Conferred Under Article 317(2) Of The Constitution, Ab-Initio Void, Without The Decision Of Council Of Ministers, Premature And Violative Of Article 21 Of The Constitution Of India.) 1. Petitioner is a member of the Karnataka Public Service Commission (hereinafter, referred to as "the KPSC"), appointed under Article 316 of the Constitution. She has assailed her suspension, which is by order dated 14/05/2014. Petitioner was appointed as a member of KPSC on 24/11/2012. The impugned order of suspension has been passed by His Excellency, the Governor, State of Karnataka, in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (2) of Article 317 of the Constitution. The basis for the impugned order is, allegation of corruption against the petitioner in selection of Gazetted Probationers. 2. The State Government...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Referred Case Is Registered As Required Under Section 366 Cr.P.C. For Confirmation Of Death Sentence Awarded To Accused No.10 Syed Mohammed Ibrahim S/O Late Mohammed Ismail By The Xxxiv Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Presiding Oficer, Spl. Court, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore By Judgment Of Conviction Dated 21/29-11-2008 In Sc No.696 Of 2005. This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Appellant Praying To Set Aside The Judgment And Order Of Convictions Dated 21.11.2008 And Sentences Dated 29.11.2008 Passed In S.C.No.696/2005, On The File Of 34th Addl. City Civil And Session Judge And P.O Spl.Court For The Trial Of Church Bomb Blast Cases, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore.) 1. A series of bomb blasts at Churches situate at various places rocked the State of Karnataka in the year 2000 attempting to disturb the normal tranquility of the civilized society and the peace loving people of Karnataka who believe in co...
Tag this Judgment!