Pate - Judgment Search Results
Miller Vs. Pate
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-13-1967
Miller v. Pate - 386 U.S. 1 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 (1967) Miller v. Pate
Reck Vs. Pate
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-12-1961
Reck v. Pate - 367 U.S. 433 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Reck v. Pate, 367 U.S. 433 (1961) Reck v. Pate
Cooper Vs. Pate
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-1964
Cooper v. Pate - 378 U.S. 546 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964) Cooper v. Pate,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pate Vs. Robinson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-07-1966
Pate v. Robinson - 383 U.S. 375 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966) Pate
Rajendra Kumar Pate Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-09-1995
Reported in: 1996(0)MPLJ580
Matched in: Parties Rajendra Kumar Pate Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Hotel Ratrani Through Its Proprietor Kan ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-10-1996
Reported in: (1997)3GLR2514; JT1997(1)SC378; 1997(1)SCALE155; (1997)2SCC490; [1996]Supp9SCR820
Matched in: Parties State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Hotel Ratrani Through Its Proprietor Kanji Vishwram Pate, Bhuj (Kutch) and ors.
Smt. Laxmibai Ramkrishna Pate, Age 65 Years,and ors. Vs. Smt. Kondabai ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-05-2010
under :The properties which are subject matter of this Appeal were undisputedly owned and possessed by Mr. Sakharam Pate. The question whether the properties were self acquired or ancestral properties of Sakharam Pate cannot be gone into
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free