Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cooper Vs. Pate

Cooper vs Pate

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100808

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
378 U.S. 546
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cooper

Respondent

Pate

Excerpt

cooper v. pate - 378 u.s. 546 (1964) u.s. supreme court cooper v. pate, 378 u.s. 546 (1964) cooper v. pate, 378 u.s. 546 (1964) no. 1134, misc. decided june 22, 1964 78 u.s. 546 per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the petitioner, an inmate at the illinois state penitentiary, brought an action under 28 u.s.c. § 1343 and 42 u.s.c. § 1983, § 1979 of the revised statutes, alleging that solely because of his religious beliefs he was denied permission to purchase certain religious publications and denied other privileges enjoyed by other prisoners. the district court granted the respondent's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted and the court of appeals affirmed. 324 f.2d 165 (c.a.7th cir.). we reverse the judgment below. taking as true the allegations of the complaint, as they must be on a motion to dismiss, the complaint stated a cause of action, and it was error to dismiss it. see pierce v. lavallee, 293 f.2d 233 (c.a.2d cir.); sewell v. pegelow, 291 f.2d 196 (c.a.4th cir.).

Full Judgment

Cooper v. Pate - 378 U.S. 546 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964)

Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964)

No. 1134, Misc.

Decided June 22, 1964

78 U.S. 546

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The petitioner, an inmate at the Illinois State Penitentiary, brought an action under 28 U.S.C. § 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, § 1979 of the Revised Statutes, alleging that solely because of his religious beliefs he was denied permission to purchase certain religious publications and denied other privileges enjoyed by other prisoners. The District Court granted the respondent's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted and the Court of Appeals affirmed. 324 F.2d 165 (C.A.7th Cir.). We reverse the judgment below. Taking as true the allegations of the complaint, as they must be on a motion to dismiss, the complaint stated a cause of action, and it was error to dismiss it. See Pierce v. LaVallee, 293 F.2d 233 (C.A.2d Cir.); Sewell v. Pegelow, 291 F.2d 196 (C.A.4th Cir.).

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial