Partnership Act - Judgment Search Results

Highlord Associates a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Par ...

Court: Kerala

/ 26TH POUSHA, 1941 WP(C).No.1143 OF 2020(P) PETITIONERS: 1 HIGHLORD ASSOCIATES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SBP 6/619, HIGH LAND BUILDING, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT -673592, REPRESENTED BY ITS

M/S.J.S.Enterprises a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Partnershi ...

Court: Kerala

CHAITHRA, AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35263/2017 of HIGHCOURT APPELLANT/S: M/S J.S.ENTERPRISES, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE PARTNERSHIP ACT, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 16/181, CHENNIMALAI ROAD, ERODE-638001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.M.MUSTHAFA, AGED 41, S/O

Kagaz Packaging a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Partner ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(5)BomCR295

exports/realisation. After verification of genuineness of the case, the concerned licensing offices shall calculate the premium amount and transfer all the papers including the relevant files to the Jt.Director General of Foreign Trade as per the jurisdiction

Sheelvik Agencies a Registered Partnership Firm Under the Indian Partn ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR266

not vacate the premises within three days of the receipt of the said letter, the Respondent would take action for recovery on or about 22nd September 2008. The Petitioner, vide letter dated 19th September 2008, asked the

D. Gowadia and Co. a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Part ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR127

on 26th December, 2006. The said Arbitration Petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'Arbitration Act''). The Union of India-Respondents filed these Arbitration proceedings on 22nd March, 2007. Thus

Chaudhary Construction Co. a Partnership Firm Duly Registered Under th ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR344; 2009(111)BomLR1665

shows that the Petitioner not only participated in regard to issuance of clarification and amendment of conditions but actually received the subject matter and varied conditions on the date aforeindicated. This fact has not even been averred

Shantez a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR799; 2009(111)BomLR1338; 2009(4)MhLj37

It would then not be a case of bailment within the meaning of Section 148 of the Contract Act. The transaction in question was neither a bailment nor a pledge. It was a composite transaction. It was

Sudhir Janardhan Desai Vs. Hyphosphite and Co. a Partnership Firm Regi ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(5)BomCR30; (2005)ILLJ302Bom; 2004(4)MhLj223

common and the facts involved in both the matters are common.2. The Petitioner workman was employed in a partnership firm, namely, Hyphosphite & Co. since February 1973. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are the partners of that … comply with the Award and, therefore, the workmen filed an application under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for recovery of the dues payable under the Award. This application

Chandulal Chunilal and Co., a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Pa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(4)BomCR688

petitions. 3. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 194/2007 is a partnership firm which is registered under the Partnership Act and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are partners of the said firm. For the sake of convenience, the

Shri Krishna Homeo Pharmacy a Partnership Firm, Registered Under the I ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(1)ALLMR129; 2006(1)BomCR229; 2006(1)MhLj325

D.Y. Chandrachud, J1. The Petitioner is a partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, 1932, and carries on the business of manufacturing and selling homoeopathic medicines at a factory situated at Chinchwad.