Skip to content


Partnership - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: partnership Page 1 of about 599 results (0.119 seconds)
Sep 24 1991 (HC)

Sp.S.S. Medical Hall, a Partnership Business Represented by One of Its ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1992)1MLJ472

..... no 11 12 east chitrai street madurai the tenant is a partnership firm represented by one of its partners sp p s shanmugham ..... rs 825 the owner of the petition premises is also a partnership firm represented by one of its partners the landlord is carrying ..... albeit he was carrying on another business either individually or in partnership in the non residential premises owned by him this interpretation is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 07 2015 (HC)

Prism Enterprises a Partnership Firm Vs. Standard Engineering a Partne ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

..... as p w i already and during the course of trial resolutions passed by plaintiff partnership firm has been produced the first resolution ex p 3 would indicate that all the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 25 1977 (HC)

Ramdayal Umraomal Partnership Firm, Raipur Vs. Pannalal Jagannathji Pa ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1978MP16; 1977MPLJ752

shiv dayal c j 1 the learned single judge has referred the following question for our opinion whether an issue...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2003 (HC)

V.R. Subbaraya Gounder and Sons, Partnership Firm, Rep. by Its Partner ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ536

orderm karpagavinayagam j 1 the petitioner firm aggrieved by the order dismissing the application filed by it in i a...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 1982 (HC)

Vasanji Mavji and Company, a Registered Partnership Firm Dealing in Co ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1982)2MLJ216

g ramanujam j 1 these two appeals arise out of the orders passed by the court below allowing i a...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 2006 (HC)

Smt. Leela Bhanott (Since Deceased) Km. Kritika Bhanott and ors. Vs. P ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: III(2006)ACC500; 2007ACJ103; 2006(2)AWC1840

m k mittal j 1 these two appeals have been filed against the judgment and decree dated 19 8 1995...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 2005 (HC)

Sudex, Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Gift-tax

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (2007)210CTR(AP)529; [2007]290ITR511(AP)

..... bench of the supreme court held as under headnote when a partner retires from a partnership the partnership continues the assets and the goodwill of the firm continue to remain the assets ..... and their accounts were debited with the consideration charged therefor the partners thereafter floated another partnership and brought in the said machinery as their capital contribution thereto this new firm .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 2009 (HC)

Sri C.J. Singh Son of Late Atam Singh Kochar Vs. State of Karnataka Re ...

Court: Karnataka

..... stating that initially the constriction company respondent is a proprietorship concern and later it became partnership firm which observation is factually incorrect the actual fact is that the construction company had ..... claimed in the application dated 10 07 2006 that it is a partnership firm 20 further it is stated that on totally irrelevant facts reasons and observations .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2002 (HC)

Wonderweld Electrodes (Private) Ltd. Rep. by Director Suryakant C. Pat ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ386; 2003(26)PTC37(Mad)

..... and supply of various types of welding electrodes the first defendant till 1988 was a partnership firm and became a private company incorporated under the companies act in 1988 the first ..... 31 03 1990 even before this agreement was entered into the plaintiff and the then partnership firm welding rods manufacturing company were working together on 16 02 1989 another agreement was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 2009 (HC)

Smt. Dhanalakshmi W/O Late Sri P.R. Kiran Vs. the Aircraft Employees H ...

Court: Karnataka

..... kiran acquired this property in his name and subsequently it became the property of the partnership firm viz m s kiran ellen enterprise of which the petitioners 2 to 5 in ..... p r kiran were partners and thus according to them the property belonged to the partnership firm for disposal of these appeals it is not necessary to refer to the inter .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //