Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: part c states miscellaneous laws repealing act 1951 schedule i repeals Page 1 of about 2,338 results (0.434 seconds)

Commissioner of Sales Tax, Indore Vs. Mohammad HussaIn Rahim Bux

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC549; 1969MPLJ493(SC); [1969]1SCR880; [1969]23STC380(SC)

..... from april 1, 1951, the extended act would come into force in the state of vindhya pradesh. thereafter the parliament passed the government of part c states act, 1951. in view of the decision of this court in delhi laws act case, : [1951]2scr747 the part c states (miscellaneous law repealing) act, (act lxvi of 1951) was enacted by parliament on ..... of the matter a requirement can certainly be spelt out from the context of article 286 that the word 'state' employed therein should include part c states. several anomalies will result if it were to be held that part c states were immune from the limitations and restrictions imposed by article 286. the explanation to article 286(1) would become ..... mentioned because in the present appeals it is common ground that the decision of the appeals would hinge on the point whether article 286 applied to part c states. it may be mentioned that the high court had agreed with the tribunal that the said article was applicable. if that view is affirmed it .....

Bhaiyalal Shukla Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC981; [1962]Supp(2)SCR257; [1962]13STC236(SC)

..... or fall together, and since the ordinance was never validly repealed, it continued to operate in vindhya pradesh till its repeal on october 31, 1951, by the part c states (miscellaneous laws) repealing act, 1951, and when the act repealed it from december 29, 1950, the effect was that there was no sales tax law in operation in ..... a result of its extension by notification s.r.o. 6 and notification no. 52 (econ), the repeal of ordinance 2 of 1949 being achieved by the part c states (miscellaneous laws) repealing act, 1951 from december 29, 1950. the respondents, therefore, seek to uphold the impugned provisions on the basis of the ruling of this court ..... this, the respondents contend that the notification s.r.o. no. 6, which added s. 29 repealing the vindhya pradesh sales tax ordinance 2 of 1949, the part c states (miscellaneous laws) repealing act, 1951 and the vindhya pradesh laws (validating) act, 1952 all concurred in repealing ordinance 2 of 1949 from december 29, 1950, but left intact .....

M. Sambasiva Rao Alias Sambaiah and ors. Vs. Osmania University, Rep. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT629

..... degrees, diplomas, certificates and titles of the university;(d) the grant of exemptions.chapter x comprise the miscellaneous provisions, section 56, the power to remove difficulties and section 57 the repeal section.42. broadly stated, the powers, functions and the duties of the university and its authorities which are relevant in these ..... the petitioner under article 14 of the constitution. it is complained that in similar circumstances the government has permitted the other colleges in other parts of the state to start the college for the academic year 1996-97 whereas for no reasons the petitioner is prevented from starting the college. under the ..... , or(b) no course or programme shall be introduced by any technical institution, university including a deemed university or university department or college; or(c) no technical institutions, universities or deemed universities or university departments or colleges shall continue to admit students for degree or diploma courses or programmes;(d) .....

Dakshina Maharashtra JaIn Sabha Vs. Rabiyabi

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR1405; 1985(1)KarLJ57

..... the quit notice to the tenant before instituting the present suit. it is the validity of these two findings so recorded by the appellate court that are challenged in this miscellaneous second appeal and in the cross objections respectively.5. the trial court by its order dated 27-(sic)-1973 rejected the plaint under order 7 rule ii ..... act as well as in the karnataka act. the relevant provision of section 2 of the bombay act, reads thus :'(1) parts i and iv of this act shall extend to the (bombay area of the state of maharashtra.(2) parts ii and iii shall extend respectively to the areas specified in schedules i and ii to this act and shall continue to ..... -section (7) of section 2 also mentions certain premises which are exempted from the operation of the karnataka act those premises are enumerated in clauses(a), (b), (bb), (bc) and (c) of sub-section (7) of section 2. there is no provision corresponding to sub-section (2) of section 4, occurring in the bombay act in the karnataka act.9. sri .....

Munnilal Kailash Chandra and ors. Vs. Akabai D/O. Malharrao and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960MP130

..... the territories enumerated therein including the territories of the 'corresponding state' of madhya pradesh (except certain districts) and the territories of the 'existing state' of madhya bharat except sunel.7. part v deals with 'high courts.'8. part xi is about 'legal and miscellaneous provisions.' in this part section 119 reads thus:'the provisions of part ii shall not be deemed to have effected any change in ..... be doubted that rules made by a high court under section 122 of the civil p. c. are covered by the definition of the word 'law' in section 2 of the act. section 122 of the civil procedure code runs thus:'high courts for part a states and part b states may, from time to time after previous publication, make rules regulating their own procedure and the .....

H.R. Patel Vs. C.G. Venkatalakshamma and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant65; AIR1955Mys65

..... correctly valued for purposes of court-fee and jurisdiction and directed the plaint to be returned for presentation to the proper court. against that order the plaintiff preferred a miscellaneous appeal to this court in mis. a. no. 77/51-52 and that appeal was heard by a division bench consisting of venkataramaiya and balakrishnaiya jj. venkataramaiya j ..... that an act which bars a civil remedy in certain cases is repugnant to the provisions of the code of civil procedure. he based his decision on the principle stated in (1932) 48 clr 128 (r) that where the paramount legislation does not purport to be exhaustive or unqualified, but itself permits or recognises other laws restraining ..... if immediately before the date on which the said code came into force in any part b state, there is in force in that state any law corresponding to the said code, that law shall on that date stand repealed. section 98, civil p. c., as now in force in mysore provides for a reference where the judges composing the .....

Roshan N.M.A. Karim Oomar and Co. and ors. Vs. Kaka Mohamed Ghouse Sah ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1977Mad175; (1977)1MLJ503

..... in this act which in any was evidences an intention to destroy the rights which had already accrued to the suitors under the repealed act. part v of the new act is entitled 'miscellaneous', and contains provisions on sundry subjects. s. 30 is one of them. it deals with suits, applications etc., for which the period ..... been passed.11. the supreme court had had occasion to consider how and from what perspective, s. 6 of the general clauses act should be applied. in state of punjab v. mohan singh, , the supreme courtobserved thus--"the line of enquiry would be, not whether the new act expressly keeps alive old rights and liabilities ..... any center act repeals any enactment, then, unless a different intention appears, the repeal shall not......... (b) affect the previous operation of any enactment so repealed; or (c) affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under any enactment so repealed; or (e) affect any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in .....

In Re Article 370 Of The Constitution

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and that the other five were highly dependent on financial assistance from the centre; b. the administrative services in the part c states were inadequate and had anomalies; and c. part c states continued to have close economic links with the adjacent areas.334 in addition, for three part c states himachal pradesh, kutch, and tripura it recommended that the union government should retain supervisory power for some time to ..... were made applicable with exceptions and modifications were: part v [the union]., part xi [relations between the union and the states]., part xii [finance, property, contracts and suits]., 283 co10 297 part e part xv [elections]., part xvi [special provisions relating to certain classes]., part xvii [official language]., part xix [miscellaneous]., part xx [amendment of the constitution]., part xxi [temporary transitional and special provisions]., part xxii [short title, commencement, authoritative text in hindi .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , special provisions to income tax and for continuation of facilities in certain state institutions etc. part-viii of the act deals with bhakra-nangal and beas projects while part-ix carries provisions regarding `services'. part-x of the act is loaded with legal and miscellaneous provisions. 26. some of the provisions of parts-vii and x of the 1966 act referred to and/or pressed into ..... where it was functioning or operating immediate before 1st november, 1966, was experienced? b. any tangible material or a fact-finding enquiry established the factum of such obstruction or difficulty? c. the cause(s) of such obstruction or difficulty originated out of the `law', namely, the 1925 act under which the board was established? d. the obstruction or difficulty, if any .....

Dr. V.K. Rajan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008CriLJ909

..... 3 of the ordinance. he filed the application before the sessions court. by impugned order annexure a2 what is decided is only to number the application as a miscellaneous original petition before the district court as petitions under section 3 has to be filed following the code of civil procedure. it was observed as follows:however, ..... are bound to give effect to that meaning irrespective of consequences as held by the apex court in nelson motis v. union of india : (1992)iillj744sc . the rule stated by tindal, c.j. in sussex peerage case (1844) 11 cl & f85, p. 143 is in the following form : 'if the words of the statute are in themselves precise ..... or amended by a competent legislature or other competent authority.then, the question is whether the ordinance was an existing law immediately before the commencement of the constitution. part ii of the government of india act, 1935 envisaged the establishment of the federation of india. section 317 of the government of india act, 1935 continued the .....